Cargando…

Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland

On conventional PET/CT, and under physiological conditions, the volume of the pituitary gland (PG) is small, and its metabolic activity is commonly comparable to the surrounding background level in (18)F-FDG imaging. We compared the physiological (18)F-FDG uptake of the PG in patients imaged with di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Marie, Allenbach, Gilles, Nicod Lalonde, Marie, Schaefer, Niklaus, Prior, John O., Gnesin, Silvano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57313-x
_version_ 1783488116918583296
author Meyer, Marie
Allenbach, Gilles
Nicod Lalonde, Marie
Schaefer, Niklaus
Prior, John O.
Gnesin, Silvano
author_facet Meyer, Marie
Allenbach, Gilles
Nicod Lalonde, Marie
Schaefer, Niklaus
Prior, John O.
Gnesin, Silvano
author_sort Meyer, Marie
collection PubMed
description On conventional PET/CT, and under physiological conditions, the volume of the pituitary gland (PG) is small, and its metabolic activity is commonly comparable to the surrounding background level in (18)F-FDG imaging. We compared the physiological (18)F-FDG uptake of the PG in patients imaged with digital PET (dPET) and with conventional PET (cPET). Additionally, we performed phantom experiments to characterize signal recovery and detectability of small structures. We retrospectively included 10 dPET and 10 cPET patients and measured PG SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVratio (using cerebellum as reference). We imaged a modified NEMA/IEC phantom with both dPET and cPET (background activity 5 kBq/mL, and 3× and 5× higher concentrations in ∅2–20-mm spherical inserts). Mean recovery coefficients (RCmean) and signal-difference-to-noise-ratio (SDNR) were computed to assess lesion detectability. Patients imaged with dPET presented higher PG SUVmax and SUVratio (SUVR) compared to patients imaged with cPET (4.7 ± 2.05 vs. 2.9 ± 0.64, p = 0.004; and 0.62 ± 0.25 vs 0.39 ± 0.09, p = 0.029, respectively), while there was no difference for SUVmean (2.7 ± 1.32 vs 2.1 ± 0.44, p = 0.39). Thus, with a SUV readout scale of 0–5 g/mL, normal PG appeared abnormally hot with dPET, but not with cPET. Phantom evidenced higher RCmean in dPET compared to cPET. For both 3x and 5x measurements, lesion detectability according to size was systematically superior with dPET. In conclusion, patients imaged with dPET presented higher (18)F-FDG physiological uptake of the PG as compared to patients imaged with cPET. These findings were supported by phantom experiments demonstrating superior signal recovery and small region detectability with dPET. Awareness of this new “higher” SUV of the normal (18)F-FDG uptake of the PG is important to avoid potential pitfalls in image interpretation, notably in oncologic patients treated with immunotherapy, who are at increased risk to develop hypophysitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6962205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69622052020-01-23 Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland Meyer, Marie Allenbach, Gilles Nicod Lalonde, Marie Schaefer, Niklaus Prior, John O. Gnesin, Silvano Sci Rep Article On conventional PET/CT, and under physiological conditions, the volume of the pituitary gland (PG) is small, and its metabolic activity is commonly comparable to the surrounding background level in (18)F-FDG imaging. We compared the physiological (18)F-FDG uptake of the PG in patients imaged with digital PET (dPET) and with conventional PET (cPET). Additionally, we performed phantom experiments to characterize signal recovery and detectability of small structures. We retrospectively included 10 dPET and 10 cPET patients and measured PG SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVratio (using cerebellum as reference). We imaged a modified NEMA/IEC phantom with both dPET and cPET (background activity 5 kBq/mL, and 3× and 5× higher concentrations in ∅2–20-mm spherical inserts). Mean recovery coefficients (RCmean) and signal-difference-to-noise-ratio (SDNR) were computed to assess lesion detectability. Patients imaged with dPET presented higher PG SUVmax and SUVratio (SUVR) compared to patients imaged with cPET (4.7 ± 2.05 vs. 2.9 ± 0.64, p = 0.004; and 0.62 ± 0.25 vs 0.39 ± 0.09, p = 0.029, respectively), while there was no difference for SUVmean (2.7 ± 1.32 vs 2.1 ± 0.44, p = 0.39). Thus, with a SUV readout scale of 0–5 g/mL, normal PG appeared abnormally hot with dPET, but not with cPET. Phantom evidenced higher RCmean in dPET compared to cPET. For both 3x and 5x measurements, lesion detectability according to size was systematically superior with dPET. In conclusion, patients imaged with dPET presented higher (18)F-FDG physiological uptake of the PG as compared to patients imaged with cPET. These findings were supported by phantom experiments demonstrating superior signal recovery and small region detectability with dPET. Awareness of this new “higher” SUV of the normal (18)F-FDG uptake of the PG is important to avoid potential pitfalls in image interpretation, notably in oncologic patients treated with immunotherapy, who are at increased risk to develop hypophysitis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6962205/ /pubmed/31942032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57313-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Meyer, Marie
Allenbach, Gilles
Nicod Lalonde, Marie
Schaefer, Niklaus
Prior, John O.
Gnesin, Silvano
Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland
title Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland
title_full Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland
title_fullStr Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland
title_full_unstemmed Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland
title_short Increased (18)F-FDG signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital PET/CT and application to the pituitary gland
title_sort increased (18)f-fdg signal recovery from small physiological structures in digital pet/ct and application to the pituitary gland
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57313-x
work_keys_str_mv AT meyermarie increased18ffdgsignalrecoveryfromsmallphysiologicalstructuresindigitalpetctandapplicationtothepituitarygland
AT allenbachgilles increased18ffdgsignalrecoveryfromsmallphysiologicalstructuresindigitalpetctandapplicationtothepituitarygland
AT nicodlalondemarie increased18ffdgsignalrecoveryfromsmallphysiologicalstructuresindigitalpetctandapplicationtothepituitarygland
AT schaeferniklaus increased18ffdgsignalrecoveryfromsmallphysiologicalstructuresindigitalpetctandapplicationtothepituitarygland
AT priorjohno increased18ffdgsignalrecoveryfromsmallphysiologicalstructuresindigitalpetctandapplicationtothepituitarygland
AT gnesinsilvano increased18ffdgsignalrecoveryfromsmallphysiologicalstructuresindigitalpetctandapplicationtothepituitarygland