Cargando…

Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?

Immune checkpoint receptors (IC) positively or negatively regulate the activation of the host immune response, preventing unwanted reactions against self-healthy tissues. In recent years the term IC has been mainly used for the inhibitory ICs, which are critical to control Natural Killer (NK) and Cy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanuza, Pilar M., Pesini, Cecilia, Arias, Maykel A., Calvo, Carlota, Ramirez-Labrada, Ariel, Pardo, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03010
_version_ 1783488127749324800
author Lanuza, Pilar M.
Pesini, Cecilia
Arias, Maykel A.
Calvo, Carlota
Ramirez-Labrada, Ariel
Pardo, Julian
author_facet Lanuza, Pilar M.
Pesini, Cecilia
Arias, Maykel A.
Calvo, Carlota
Ramirez-Labrada, Ariel
Pardo, Julian
author_sort Lanuza, Pilar M.
collection PubMed
description Immune checkpoint receptors (IC) positively or negatively regulate the activation of the host immune response, preventing unwanted reactions against self-healthy tissues. In recent years the term IC has been mainly used for the inhibitory ICs, which are critical to control Natural Killer (NK) and Cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells due to its high cytotoxic potential. Due to the different nature of the signals that regulate T and NK cell activation, specific ICs have been described that mainly regulate either NK cell or T cell activity. Thus, strategies to modulate NK cell activity are raising as promising tools to treat tumors that do not respond to T cell-based immunotherapies. NK cell activation is mainly regulated by ICs and receptors from the KIR, NKG2 and NCRs families and the contribution of T cell-related ICs is less clear. Recently, NK cells have emerged as contributors to the effect of inhibitors of T cell-related ICs like CTLA4, LAG3 or the PD1/PD-L1 axes in cancer patients, suggesting that these ICs also regulate the activity of NK cells under pathological conditions. Strikingly, in contrast to NK cells from cancer patients, the level of expression of these ICs is low on most subsets of freshly isolated and in vitro activated NK cells from healthy patients, suggesting that they do not control NK cell tolerance and thus, do not act as conventional ICs under non-pathological conditions. The low level of expression of T cell-related ICs in “healthy” NK cells suggest that they should not be restricted to the detrimental effects of these inhibitory mechanisms in the cancer microenvironment. After a brief introduction of the regulatory mechanisms that control NK cell anti-tumoral activity and the conventional ICs controlling NK cell tolerance, we will critically discuss the potential role of T cell-related ICs in the control of NK cell activity under both physiological and pathological (cancer) conditions. This discussion will allow to comprehensively describe the chances and potential limitations of using allogeneic NK cells isolated from a healthy environment to overcome immune subversion by T cell-related ICs and to improve the efficacy of IC inhibitors (ICIs) in a safer way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6962251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69622512020-01-29 Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer? Lanuza, Pilar M. Pesini, Cecilia Arias, Maykel A. Calvo, Carlota Ramirez-Labrada, Ariel Pardo, Julian Front Immunol Immunology Immune checkpoint receptors (IC) positively or negatively regulate the activation of the host immune response, preventing unwanted reactions against self-healthy tissues. In recent years the term IC has been mainly used for the inhibitory ICs, which are critical to control Natural Killer (NK) and Cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells due to its high cytotoxic potential. Due to the different nature of the signals that regulate T and NK cell activation, specific ICs have been described that mainly regulate either NK cell or T cell activity. Thus, strategies to modulate NK cell activity are raising as promising tools to treat tumors that do not respond to T cell-based immunotherapies. NK cell activation is mainly regulated by ICs and receptors from the KIR, NKG2 and NCRs families and the contribution of T cell-related ICs is less clear. Recently, NK cells have emerged as contributors to the effect of inhibitors of T cell-related ICs like CTLA4, LAG3 or the PD1/PD-L1 axes in cancer patients, suggesting that these ICs also regulate the activity of NK cells under pathological conditions. Strikingly, in contrast to NK cells from cancer patients, the level of expression of these ICs is low on most subsets of freshly isolated and in vitro activated NK cells from healthy patients, suggesting that they do not control NK cell tolerance and thus, do not act as conventional ICs under non-pathological conditions. The low level of expression of T cell-related ICs in “healthy” NK cells suggest that they should not be restricted to the detrimental effects of these inhibitory mechanisms in the cancer microenvironment. After a brief introduction of the regulatory mechanisms that control NK cell anti-tumoral activity and the conventional ICs controlling NK cell tolerance, we will critically discuss the potential role of T cell-related ICs in the control of NK cell activity under both physiological and pathological (cancer) conditions. This discussion will allow to comprehensively describe the chances and potential limitations of using allogeneic NK cells isolated from a healthy environment to overcome immune subversion by T cell-related ICs and to improve the efficacy of IC inhibitors (ICIs) in a safer way. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6962251/ /pubmed/31998304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03010 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lanuza, Pesini, Arias, Calvo, Ramirez-Labrada and Pardo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Lanuza, Pilar M.
Pesini, Cecilia
Arias, Maykel A.
Calvo, Carlota
Ramirez-Labrada, Ariel
Pardo, Julian
Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?
title Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?
title_full Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?
title_fullStr Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?
title_full_unstemmed Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?
title_short Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer?
title_sort recalling the biological significance of immune checkpoints on nk cells: a chance to overcome lag3, pd1, and ctla4 inhibitory pathways by adoptive nk cell transfer?
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03010
work_keys_str_mv AT lanuzapilarm recallingthebiologicalsignificanceofimmunecheckpointsonnkcellsachancetoovercomelag3pd1andctla4inhibitorypathwaysbyadoptivenkcelltransfer
AT pesinicecilia recallingthebiologicalsignificanceofimmunecheckpointsonnkcellsachancetoovercomelag3pd1andctla4inhibitorypathwaysbyadoptivenkcelltransfer
AT ariasmaykela recallingthebiologicalsignificanceofimmunecheckpointsonnkcellsachancetoovercomelag3pd1andctla4inhibitorypathwaysbyadoptivenkcelltransfer
AT calvocarlota recallingthebiologicalsignificanceofimmunecheckpointsonnkcellsachancetoovercomelag3pd1andctla4inhibitorypathwaysbyadoptivenkcelltransfer
AT ramirezlabradaariel recallingthebiologicalsignificanceofimmunecheckpointsonnkcellsachancetoovercomelag3pd1andctla4inhibitorypathwaysbyadoptivenkcelltransfer
AT pardojulian recallingthebiologicalsignificanceofimmunecheckpointsonnkcellsachancetoovercomelag3pd1andctla4inhibitorypathwaysbyadoptivenkcelltransfer