Cargando…
Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review
PURPOSE: The Outcome measures for vascular malformation (OVAMA) group reached consensus on the core outcome domains for the core outcome set (COS) for peripheral vascular malformations (venous, lymphatic and arteriovenous malformations). However, it is unclear which instruments should be used to mea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x |
_version_ | 1783488131464429568 |
---|---|
author | Horbach, Sophie E. R. Rongen, Amber P. M. Elbers, Roy G. van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M. Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. Spuls, Phyllis I. |
author_facet | Horbach, Sophie E. R. Rongen, Amber P. M. Elbers, Roy G. van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M. Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. Spuls, Phyllis I. |
author_sort | Horbach, Sophie E. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Outcome measures for vascular malformation (OVAMA) group reached consensus on the core outcome domains for the core outcome set (COS) for peripheral vascular malformations (venous, lymphatic and arteriovenous malformations). However, it is unclear which instruments should be used to measure these domains. Therefore, our aims were to identify all outcome measurement instruments available for vascular malformations, and to evaluate their measurement properties. METHODS: With the first literature search, we identified outcomes and instruments previously used in prospective studies on vascular malformations. A second search yielded studies on measurement properties of patient- and physician-reported instruments that were either developed for vascular malformations, or used in prospective studies. If the latter instruments were not specifically validated for vascular malformations, we performed a third search for studies on measurement properties in clinically similar diseases (vascular or lymphatic diseases and benign tumors). We assessed the methodological quality of these studies following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology, and evaluated the quality of the measurement properties. RESULTS: The first search yielded 27 studies, none using disease-specific instruments. The second and third search included 22 development and/or validation studies, concerning six instruments. Only the Lymphatic Malformation Function Instrument was developed specifically for vascular malformations. Other instruments were generic QoL instruments developed and/or partly validated for clinically similar diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research on measurement properties is needed to assess which instruments may be included in the COS. This review informs the instrument selection and/or the development of new instruments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, 42017056242. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6962285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69622852020-01-30 Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review Horbach, Sophie E. R. Rongen, Amber P. M. Elbers, Roy G. van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M. Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. Spuls, Phyllis I. Qual Life Res Review PURPOSE: The Outcome measures for vascular malformation (OVAMA) group reached consensus on the core outcome domains for the core outcome set (COS) for peripheral vascular malformations (venous, lymphatic and arteriovenous malformations). However, it is unclear which instruments should be used to measure these domains. Therefore, our aims were to identify all outcome measurement instruments available for vascular malformations, and to evaluate their measurement properties. METHODS: With the first literature search, we identified outcomes and instruments previously used in prospective studies on vascular malformations. A second search yielded studies on measurement properties of patient- and physician-reported instruments that were either developed for vascular malformations, or used in prospective studies. If the latter instruments were not specifically validated for vascular malformations, we performed a third search for studies on measurement properties in clinically similar diseases (vascular or lymphatic diseases and benign tumors). We assessed the methodological quality of these studies following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology, and evaluated the quality of the measurement properties. RESULTS: The first search yielded 27 studies, none using disease-specific instruments. The second and third search included 22 development and/or validation studies, concerning six instruments. Only the Lymphatic Malformation Function Instrument was developed specifically for vascular malformations. Other instruments were generic QoL instruments developed and/or partly validated for clinically similar diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research on measurement properties is needed to assess which instruments may be included in the COS. This review informs the instrument selection and/or the development of new instruments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, 42017056242. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6962285/ /pubmed/31549367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Horbach, Sophie E. R. Rongen, Amber P. M. Elbers, Roy G. van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M. Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. Spuls, Phyllis I. Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
title | Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
title_full | Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
title_short | Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
title_sort | outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horbachsophieer outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview AT rongenamberpm outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview AT elbersroyg outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview AT vanderhorstchantalmam outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview AT prinsenceciliaac outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview AT spulsphyllisi outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview AT outcomemeasurementinstrumentsforperipheralvascularmalformationsandanassessmentofthemeasurementpropertiesasystematicreview |