Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women
The three main causes of vaginitis are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis (TV). Two multiplex assays are commercially available for detection of DNA from organisms associated with vaginitis: BD Affirm™ VPIII Microbial Identification Test (Affirm) and BD MAX™...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31502121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03694-w |
_version_ | 1783488131958308864 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Alexandra Timm, Karen Borders, Noelle Montoya, Liz Culbreath, Karissa |
author_facet | Thompson, Alexandra Timm, Karen Borders, Noelle Montoya, Liz Culbreath, Karissa |
author_sort | Thompson, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | The three main causes of vaginitis are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis (TV). Two multiplex assays are commercially available for detection of DNA from organisms associated with vaginitis: BD Affirm™ VPIII Microbial Identification Test (Affirm) and BD MAX™ Vaginal Panel (MAX VP). Here, the performance of MAX VP was compared to that of Affirm, which was considered the standard of care. Four vaginal swabs were collected from each subject with the following: BD Affirm™ VPIII Ambient Temperature Transport System (ATTS), BD MAX™ UVE Specimen Collection Kit, Hologic Aptima® Vaginal Swab Specimen Collection Kit, and BD ESwab™ collection and transport system (ESwab). Candida culture, Gram stain followed by Nugent scoring, and the Hologic Aptima® Trichomonas vaginalis assay were used for discordant analysis. Results were considered true positive if there were at least two tests positive for any vaginitis target. A total of 200 symptomatic women were evaluated in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of MAX VP for BV was 96.2% and 96.1%, respectively, compared to 96.2% and 81.6% for Affirm. The sensitivity and specificity of MAX VP for Candida spp. was 98.4% and 95.4%, respectively, compared to 69.4% and 100% for Affirm. MAX VP and Affirm showed 100% concordance for detection of TV. These results demonstrate improved accuracy of MAX VP compared to Affirm for the detection of BV and Candida spp. and no difference for detection of TV between the two tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6962287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69622872020-01-30 Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women Thompson, Alexandra Timm, Karen Borders, Noelle Montoya, Liz Culbreath, Karissa Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article The three main causes of vaginitis are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis (TV). Two multiplex assays are commercially available for detection of DNA from organisms associated with vaginitis: BD Affirm™ VPIII Microbial Identification Test (Affirm) and BD MAX™ Vaginal Panel (MAX VP). Here, the performance of MAX VP was compared to that of Affirm, which was considered the standard of care. Four vaginal swabs were collected from each subject with the following: BD Affirm™ VPIII Ambient Temperature Transport System (ATTS), BD MAX™ UVE Specimen Collection Kit, Hologic Aptima® Vaginal Swab Specimen Collection Kit, and BD ESwab™ collection and transport system (ESwab). Candida culture, Gram stain followed by Nugent scoring, and the Hologic Aptima® Trichomonas vaginalis assay were used for discordant analysis. Results were considered true positive if there were at least two tests positive for any vaginitis target. A total of 200 symptomatic women were evaluated in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of MAX VP for BV was 96.2% and 96.1%, respectively, compared to 96.2% and 81.6% for Affirm. The sensitivity and specificity of MAX VP for Candida spp. was 98.4% and 95.4%, respectively, compared to 69.4% and 100% for Affirm. MAX VP and Affirm showed 100% concordance for detection of TV. These results demonstrate improved accuracy of MAX VP compared to Affirm for the detection of BV and Candida spp. and no difference for detection of TV between the two tests. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6962287/ /pubmed/31502121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03694-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Thompson, Alexandra Timm, Karen Borders, Noelle Montoya, Liz Culbreath, Karissa Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
title | Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31502121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03694-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonalexandra diagnosticperformanceoftwomolecularassaysforthedetectionofvaginitisinsymptomaticwomen AT timmkaren diagnosticperformanceoftwomolecularassaysforthedetectionofvaginitisinsymptomaticwomen AT bordersnoelle diagnosticperformanceoftwomolecularassaysforthedetectionofvaginitisinsymptomaticwomen AT montoyaliz diagnosticperformanceoftwomolecularassaysforthedetectionofvaginitisinsymptomaticwomen AT culbreathkarissa diagnosticperformanceoftwomolecularassaysforthedetectionofvaginitisinsymptomaticwomen |