Cargando…
A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
This retrospective study was designed to investigate the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 (the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system, FIGO) and conduct a risk stratification for this group of patients. We reviewed clinical records of 3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57202-3 |
_version_ | 1783488140313362432 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiaoliang Wang, Weiping Hu, Ke Zhang, Fuquan Hou, Xiaorong Yan, Junfang Meng, Qingyu Zhou, Ziqi Miao, Zheng Guan, Hui Ma, Jiabin Shen, Jing Zhen, Hongnan Wang, Wenhui |
author_facet | Liu, Xiaoliang Wang, Weiping Hu, Ke Zhang, Fuquan Hou, Xiaorong Yan, Junfang Meng, Qingyu Zhou, Ziqi Miao, Zheng Guan, Hui Ma, Jiabin Shen, Jing Zhen, Hongnan Wang, Wenhui |
author_sort | Liu, Xiaoliang |
collection | PubMed |
description | This retrospective study was designed to investigate the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 (the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system, FIGO) and conduct a risk stratification for this group of patients. We reviewed clinical records of 325 patients with stage IIIC1 treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our institute between January 2008 and December 2014. The median follow-up duration was 28.4 months (range: 1.9–114.2 months). The 3-year DFS for the 325 eligible patients was 66.3%. Tumor size of ≥4 cm and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis ≥2 were identified as adverse prognostic factors for disease free survival (DFS) in cervical cancer patients with stage IIIC1 (2018). A risk stratification based on the number of identified prognostic factors for DFS was performed. The 3-year DFS for patients in low-risk (without prognostic factor), intermediate-risk (with one prognostic factor) and high-risk group (with two prognostic factors) was 92.1%, 70.0%, and 51.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Our study confirms the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in FIGO stage IIIC1 (the 2018 FIGO staging system). Tumor size and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) are significant prognostic factors for DFS in patients with FIGO stage IIIC1. The next revision of FIGO staging system for cervical cancer, especially for stage IIIC1, should focus on tumor size and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6962323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69623232020-01-23 A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System Liu, Xiaoliang Wang, Weiping Hu, Ke Zhang, Fuquan Hou, Xiaorong Yan, Junfang Meng, Qingyu Zhou, Ziqi Miao, Zheng Guan, Hui Ma, Jiabin Shen, Jing Zhen, Hongnan Wang, Wenhui Sci Rep Article This retrospective study was designed to investigate the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 (the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system, FIGO) and conduct a risk stratification for this group of patients. We reviewed clinical records of 325 patients with stage IIIC1 treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our institute between January 2008 and December 2014. The median follow-up duration was 28.4 months (range: 1.9–114.2 months). The 3-year DFS for the 325 eligible patients was 66.3%. Tumor size of ≥4 cm and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis ≥2 were identified as adverse prognostic factors for disease free survival (DFS) in cervical cancer patients with stage IIIC1 (2018). A risk stratification based on the number of identified prognostic factors for DFS was performed. The 3-year DFS for patients in low-risk (without prognostic factor), intermediate-risk (with one prognostic factor) and high-risk group (with two prognostic factors) was 92.1%, 70.0%, and 51.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Our study confirms the heterogeneity of patients with cervical cancer in FIGO stage IIIC1 (the 2018 FIGO staging system). Tumor size and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) are significant prognostic factors for DFS in patients with FIGO stage IIIC1. The next revision of FIGO staging system for cervical cancer, especially for stage IIIC1, should focus on tumor size and number of pelvic lymph node metastasis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6962323/ /pubmed/31941966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57202-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Xiaoliang Wang, Weiping Hu, Ke Zhang, Fuquan Hou, Xiaorong Yan, Junfang Meng, Qingyu Zhou, Ziqi Miao, Zheng Guan, Hui Ma, Jiabin Shen, Jing Zhen, Hongnan Wang, Wenhui A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System |
title | A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System |
title_full | A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System |
title_fullStr | A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System |
title_full_unstemmed | A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System |
title_short | A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System |
title_sort | risk stratification for patients with cervical cancer in stage iiic1 of the 2018 figo staging system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57202-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiaoliang ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT wangweiping ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT huke ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT zhangfuquan ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT houxiaorong ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT yanjunfang ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT mengqingyu ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT zhouziqi ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT miaozheng ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT guanhui ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT majiabin ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT shenjing ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT zhenhongnan ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT wangwenhui ariskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT liuxiaoliang riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT wangweiping riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT huke riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT zhangfuquan riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT houxiaorong riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT yanjunfang riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT mengqingyu riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT zhouziqi riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT miaozheng riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT guanhui riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT majiabin riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT shenjing riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT zhenhongnan riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem AT wangwenhui riskstratificationforpatientswithcervicalcancerinstageiiic1ofthe2018figostagingsystem |