Cargando…
An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day(1,2) despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect(3). The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2 |
_version_ | 1783488180895350784 |
---|---|
author | Vagnozzi, Ronald J. Maillet, Marjorie Sargent, Michelle A. Khalil, Hadi Johansen, Anne Katrine Schwanekamp, Jennifer A. York, Allen J. Huang, Vincent Nahrendorf, Matthias Sadayappan, Sakthivel Molkentin, Jeffery D. |
author_facet | Vagnozzi, Ronald J. Maillet, Marjorie Sargent, Michelle A. Khalil, Hadi Johansen, Anne Katrine Schwanekamp, Jennifer A. York, Allen J. Huang, Vincent Nahrendorf, Matthias Sadayappan, Sakthivel Molkentin, Jeffery D. |
author_sort | Vagnozzi, Ronald J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day(1,2) despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect(3). The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischemic injury(4,5). Here we examined the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and while heart function was enhanced, it was not associated with new cardiomyocyte production. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophages. Intra-cardiac injection of 2 distinct types of adult stem cells, freeze/thaw-killed cells or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response similarly induced regional CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophage accumulation and provided functional rejuvenation to the I/R-injured heart. This selective macrophage response altered cardiac fibroblast activity, reduced border zone extracellular matrix (ECM) content, and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound healing response that rejuvenates the mechanical properties of the infarcted area of the heart. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6962570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69625702020-05-27 An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy Vagnozzi, Ronald J. Maillet, Marjorie Sargent, Michelle A. Khalil, Hadi Johansen, Anne Katrine Schwanekamp, Jennifer A. York, Allen J. Huang, Vincent Nahrendorf, Matthias Sadayappan, Sakthivel Molkentin, Jeffery D. Nature Article Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day(1,2) despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect(3). The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischemic injury(4,5). Here we examined the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and while heart function was enhanced, it was not associated with new cardiomyocyte production. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophages. Intra-cardiac injection of 2 distinct types of adult stem cells, freeze/thaw-killed cells or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response similarly induced regional CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophage accumulation and provided functional rejuvenation to the I/R-injured heart. This selective macrophage response altered cardiac fibroblast activity, reduced border zone extracellular matrix (ECM) content, and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound healing response that rejuvenates the mechanical properties of the infarcted area of the heart. 2019-11-27 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6962570/ /pubmed/31775156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Vagnozzi, Ronald J. Maillet, Marjorie Sargent, Michelle A. Khalil, Hadi Johansen, Anne Katrine Schwanekamp, Jennifer A. York, Allen J. Huang, Vincent Nahrendorf, Matthias Sadayappan, Sakthivel Molkentin, Jeffery D. An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
title | An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
title_full | An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
title_fullStr | An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
title_short | An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
title_sort | acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vagnozzironaldj anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT mailletmarjorie anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT sargentmichellea anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT khalilhadi anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT johansenannekatrine anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT schwanekampjennifera anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT yorkallenj anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT huangvincent anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT nahrendorfmatthias anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT sadayappansakthivel anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT molkentinjefferyd anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT vagnozzironaldj acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT mailletmarjorie acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT sargentmichellea acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT khalilhadi acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT johansenannekatrine acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT schwanekampjennifera acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT yorkallenj acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT huangvincent acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT nahrendorfmatthias acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT sadayappansakthivel acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy AT molkentinjefferyd acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy |