Cargando…

An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy

Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day(1,2) despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect(3). The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vagnozzi, Ronald J., Maillet, Marjorie, Sargent, Michelle A., Khalil, Hadi, Johansen, Anne Katrine, Schwanekamp, Jennifer A., York, Allen J., Huang, Vincent, Nahrendorf, Matthias, Sadayappan, Sakthivel, Molkentin, Jeffery D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2
_version_ 1783488180895350784
author Vagnozzi, Ronald J.
Maillet, Marjorie
Sargent, Michelle A.
Khalil, Hadi
Johansen, Anne Katrine
Schwanekamp, Jennifer A.
York, Allen J.
Huang, Vincent
Nahrendorf, Matthias
Sadayappan, Sakthivel
Molkentin, Jeffery D.
author_facet Vagnozzi, Ronald J.
Maillet, Marjorie
Sargent, Michelle A.
Khalil, Hadi
Johansen, Anne Katrine
Schwanekamp, Jennifer A.
York, Allen J.
Huang, Vincent
Nahrendorf, Matthias
Sadayappan, Sakthivel
Molkentin, Jeffery D.
author_sort Vagnozzi, Ronald J.
collection PubMed
description Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day(1,2) despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect(3). The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischemic injury(4,5). Here we examined the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and while heart function was enhanced, it was not associated with new cardiomyocyte production. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophages. Intra-cardiac injection of 2 distinct types of adult stem cells, freeze/thaw-killed cells or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response similarly induced regional CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophage accumulation and provided functional rejuvenation to the I/R-injured heart. This selective macrophage response altered cardiac fibroblast activity, reduced border zone extracellular matrix (ECM) content, and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound healing response that rejuvenates the mechanical properties of the infarcted area of the heart.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6962570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69625702020-05-27 An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy Vagnozzi, Ronald J. Maillet, Marjorie Sargent, Michelle A. Khalil, Hadi Johansen, Anne Katrine Schwanekamp, Jennifer A. York, Allen J. Huang, Vincent Nahrendorf, Matthias Sadayappan, Sakthivel Molkentin, Jeffery D. Nature Article Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day(1,2) despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect(3). The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischemic injury(4,5). Here we examined the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and while heart function was enhanced, it was not associated with new cardiomyocyte production. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophages. Intra-cardiac injection of 2 distinct types of adult stem cells, freeze/thaw-killed cells or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response similarly induced regional CCR2(+) and CX3CR1(+) macrophage accumulation and provided functional rejuvenation to the I/R-injured heart. This selective macrophage response altered cardiac fibroblast activity, reduced border zone extracellular matrix (ECM) content, and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound healing response that rejuvenates the mechanical properties of the infarcted area of the heart. 2019-11-27 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6962570/ /pubmed/31775156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Vagnozzi, Ronald J.
Maillet, Marjorie
Sargent, Michelle A.
Khalil, Hadi
Johansen, Anne Katrine
Schwanekamp, Jennifer A.
York, Allen J.
Huang, Vincent
Nahrendorf, Matthias
Sadayappan, Sakthivel
Molkentin, Jeffery D.
An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
title An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
title_full An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
title_fullStr An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
title_full_unstemmed An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
title_short An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
title_sort acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vagnozzironaldj anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT mailletmarjorie anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT sargentmichellea anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT khalilhadi anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT johansenannekatrine anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT schwanekampjennifera anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT yorkallenj anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT huangvincent anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT nahrendorfmatthias anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT sadayappansakthivel anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT molkentinjefferyd anacuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT vagnozzironaldj acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT mailletmarjorie acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT sargentmichellea acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT khalilhadi acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT johansenannekatrine acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT schwanekampjennifera acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT yorkallenj acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT huangvincent acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT nahrendorfmatthias acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT sadayappansakthivel acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy
AT molkentinjefferyd acuteimmuneresponseunderliesthebenefitofcardiacstemcelltherapy