Cargando…

Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine

BACKGROUND: Levodopa and dopamine agonists (dopamine replacement therapy [DRT]) are implicated in Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), but the relationship between DRT and neurotransmitter dysfunction inherent to PD remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between baseline stria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dave, Sonali, Weintraub, Daniel, Aarsland, Dag, ffytche, Dominic H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12851
_version_ 1783488192898400256
author Dave, Sonali
Weintraub, Daniel
Aarsland, Dag
ffytche, Dominic H.
author_facet Dave, Sonali
Weintraub, Daniel
Aarsland, Dag
ffytche, Dominic H.
author_sort Dave, Sonali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Levodopa and dopamine agonists (dopamine replacement therapy [DRT]) are implicated in Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), but the relationship between DRT and neurotransmitter dysfunction inherent to PD remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between baseline striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) binding in drug‐naïve idiopathic PD, introduction of DRT, or dose change and incident early‐onset PDP. METHODS: Baseline DAT binding was compared between patients with and without incident psychosis (defined here as hallucinations or delusions), controlling for age, sex, baseline cognition, and prospective DRT in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative cohort. Incident illusions were not considered psychosis symptoms. RESULTS: Of 386 patients, 30 (8%) developed PDP (predominantly hallucinations, mean onset 42 months) and 355 (92%) had either no PDP symptoms (mean follow‐up 64 months) or reported illusions only (111/355, 31%). Incident PDP was associated with reduced baseline striatal DAT binding, controlling for confounders (F (1,377) = 10.9; P = 0.001), but not with a specific DRT regime. A total of 6 patients developed PDP when DRT free. There was no suggestion that PDP onset was coincident with starting levodopa or levodopa dose increase. Incident illusions were not associated with reduced DAT binding. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the role of disease‐related dopamine mechanisms in the pathophysiology of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease alongside medication. It remains to be determined how dopamine mechanisms, medication, and other neurotransmitter systems implicated in PDP interact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6962668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69626682020-09-29 Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine Dave, Sonali Weintraub, Daniel Aarsland, Dag ffytche, Dominic H. Mov Disord Clin Pract Research Articles BACKGROUND: Levodopa and dopamine agonists (dopamine replacement therapy [DRT]) are implicated in Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), but the relationship between DRT and neurotransmitter dysfunction inherent to PD remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between baseline striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) binding in drug‐naïve idiopathic PD, introduction of DRT, or dose change and incident early‐onset PDP. METHODS: Baseline DAT binding was compared between patients with and without incident psychosis (defined here as hallucinations or delusions), controlling for age, sex, baseline cognition, and prospective DRT in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative cohort. Incident illusions were not considered psychosis symptoms. RESULTS: Of 386 patients, 30 (8%) developed PDP (predominantly hallucinations, mean onset 42 months) and 355 (92%) had either no PDP symptoms (mean follow‐up 64 months) or reported illusions only (111/355, 31%). Incident PDP was associated with reduced baseline striatal DAT binding, controlling for confounders (F (1,377) = 10.9; P = 0.001), but not with a specific DRT regime. A total of 6 patients developed PDP when DRT free. There was no suggestion that PDP onset was coincident with starting levodopa or levodopa dose increase. Incident illusions were not associated with reduced DAT binding. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the role of disease‐related dopamine mechanisms in the pathophysiology of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease alongside medication. It remains to be determined how dopamine mechanisms, medication, and other neurotransmitter systems implicated in PDP interact. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6962668/ /pubmed/31970209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12851 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Dave, Sonali
Weintraub, Daniel
Aarsland, Dag
ffytche, Dominic H.
Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine
title Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine
title_full Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine
title_fullStr Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine
title_full_unstemmed Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine
title_short Drug and Disease Effects in Parkinson's Psychosis: Revisiting the Role of Dopamine
title_sort drug and disease effects in parkinson's psychosis: revisiting the role of dopamine
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12851
work_keys_str_mv AT davesonali druganddiseaseeffectsinparkinsonspsychosisrevisitingtheroleofdopamine
AT weintraubdaniel druganddiseaseeffectsinparkinsonspsychosisrevisitingtheroleofdopamine
AT aarslanddag druganddiseaseeffectsinparkinsonspsychosisrevisitingtheroleofdopamine
AT ffytchedominich druganddiseaseeffectsinparkinsonspsychosisrevisitingtheroleofdopamine