Cargando…

Utility of trans-vaginal ultrasound in diagnosis and follow-up of non-pregnant sexually active females with lower ureteric calculi

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of trans-vaginal ultrasonography in evaluation of non-pregnant sexually active female patients with lower ureteric calculi. METHODS: A prospective study was done from January 2015 to December 2017 including non-pregnant sexually active females with suspected ureteric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandey, Siddharth, Pandey, Tanica, Goel, Apul, Aggarwal, Ajay, Sharma, Deepanshu, Pandey, Tushar, sankhwar, Satya, Garg, Gaurav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.007
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of trans-vaginal ultrasonography in evaluation of non-pregnant sexually active female patients with lower ureteric calculi. METHODS: A prospective study was done from January 2015 to December 2017 including non-pregnant sexually active females with suspected ureteric calculus. Trans-abdominal ultrasound was initially done in all patients. In those patients in whom trans-abdominal ultrasound was inconclusive or there was indirect evidence of lower ureteric calculus in form of ureteral dilation but no calculus was evident, trans-vaginal ultrasound was done. The patients with ureteric calculi detected on trans-vaginal ultrasound and kept on conservative management were also followed up with trans-vaginal ultrasound. Non-contrast computed tomography was done in patients with inconclusive trans-vaginal ultrasound. RESULTS: As per the study protocol, 156 out of the total 468 patients evaluated by trans-abdominal ultrasound were eligible for trans-vaginal ultrasound. Trans-vaginal ultrasound was done in 149 patients, as seven patients did not give consent. Seventy-nine patients were detected with a lower ureteric calculus on trans-vaginal ultrasound and 27 patients had gynecologic or other cause for their symptoms. Forty-three patients had an inconclusive trans-vaginal ultrasound of which 36 underwent non-contrast computed tomography, among them only one patient had a lower ureteric calculus. Stone free status could be easily demonstrated on follow-up trans-vaginal ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Trans-vaginal ultrasound in addition to trans-abdominal ultrasound is a very useful tool in evaluation of sexually active females with suspected lower ureteric calculus.