Cargando…

Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location chan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Han Jo, York, Philip J., Elysee, Jonathan C., Shaffrey, Christopher, Burton, Douglas C., Ames, Christopher P., Mundis, Gregory M., Hostin, Richard, Bess, Shay, Klineberg, Eric, Smith, Justin S., Passias, Peter, Schwab, Frank, Lafage, Renaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6963350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879085
_version_ 1783488260893310976
author Kim, Han Jo
York, Philip J.
Elysee, Jonathan C.
Shaffrey, Christopher
Burton, Douglas C.
Ames, Christopher P.
Mundis, Gregory M.
Hostin, Richard
Bess, Shay
Klineberg, Eric
Smith, Justin S.
Passias, Peter
Schwab, Frank
Lafage, Renaud
author_facet Kim, Han Jo
York, Philip J.
Elysee, Jonathan C.
Shaffrey, Christopher
Burton, Douglas C.
Ames, Christopher P.
Mundis, Gregory M.
Hostin, Richard
Bess, Shay
Klineberg, Eric
Smith, Justin S.
Passias, Peter
Schwab, Frank
Lafage, Renaud
author_sort Kim, Han Jo
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location changes proximal spinal alignment. METHODS: Patients were grouped by upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV): lower thoracic (LT; T8-L1) or upper thoracic (UT; T1-7). Alignment parameters were compared. Correlation analysis was performed between PJK magnitude and global/cervical alignment. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included; mean age of 63 years, body mass index 28, and 81% female, LT (n = 193) versus UT (n = 176). The rate of radiographic PJK was 49%, higher in the LT group (55% vs 42%, P = .01). The UT group displayed significant differences in all cervical radiographic parameters (P < .05) between PJK versus non-PJK patients, while the LT group displayed significant differences in T1S and C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (CTS). In comparing UT versus LT patients, UT had more posterior global alignment (smaller TPA [T1 pelvic angle], SVA, and larger PT [pelvic tilt]) and larger anterior cervical alignment (greater cSVA [cervical SVA], T1S-CL [T1 slope–cervical lordosis] mismatch, CTS) compared to LT. Correlation analysis of PJK magnitude and location demonstrated a correlation with increases in CL, T1S, and CTS in the UT group. In the LT group, PT increased with PJK angle (r = 0.17) and no significant correlations were noted to SVA, cSVA, or T1S-CL. CONCLUSIONS: PJK location influences compensation mechanisms of the cervical and thoracic spine. LT PJK results in increased PT and CL with decreased CTS. UT PJK increases CL to counter increases in T1S with continued T1S-CL mismatch and elevated cSVA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6963350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69633502020-01-30 Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? Kim, Han Jo York, Philip J. Elysee, Jonathan C. Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas C. Ames, Christopher P. Mundis, Gregory M. Hostin, Richard Bess, Shay Klineberg, Eric Smith, Justin S. Passias, Peter Schwab, Frank Lafage, Renaud Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location changes proximal spinal alignment. METHODS: Patients were grouped by upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV): lower thoracic (LT; T8-L1) or upper thoracic (UT; T1-7). Alignment parameters were compared. Correlation analysis was performed between PJK magnitude and global/cervical alignment. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included; mean age of 63 years, body mass index 28, and 81% female, LT (n = 193) versus UT (n = 176). The rate of radiographic PJK was 49%, higher in the LT group (55% vs 42%, P = .01). The UT group displayed significant differences in all cervical radiographic parameters (P < .05) between PJK versus non-PJK patients, while the LT group displayed significant differences in T1S and C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (CTS). In comparing UT versus LT patients, UT had more posterior global alignment (smaller TPA [T1 pelvic angle], SVA, and larger PT [pelvic tilt]) and larger anterior cervical alignment (greater cSVA [cervical SVA], T1S-CL [T1 slope–cervical lordosis] mismatch, CTS) compared to LT. Correlation analysis of PJK magnitude and location demonstrated a correlation with increases in CL, T1S, and CTS in the UT group. In the LT group, PT increased with PJK angle (r = 0.17) and no significant correlations were noted to SVA, cSVA, or T1S-CL. CONCLUSIONS: PJK location influences compensation mechanisms of the cervical and thoracic spine. LT PJK results in increased PT and CL with decreased CTS. UT PJK increases CL to counter increases in T1S with continued T1S-CL mismatch and elevated cSVA. SAGE Publications 2019-09-30 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6963350/ /pubmed/32002344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879085 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kim, Han Jo
York, Philip J.
Elysee, Jonathan C.
Shaffrey, Christopher
Burton, Douglas C.
Ames, Christopher P.
Mundis, Gregory M.
Hostin, Richard
Bess, Shay
Klineberg, Eric
Smith, Justin S.
Passias, Peter
Schwab, Frank
Lafage, Renaud
Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
title Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
title_full Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
title_fullStr Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
title_short Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
title_sort cervical, thoracic, and spinopelvic compensation after proximal junctional kyphosis (pjk): does location of pjk matter?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6963350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879085
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhanjo cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT yorkphilipj cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT elyseejonathanc cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT shaffreychristopher cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT burtondouglasc cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT ameschristopherp cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT mundisgregorym cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT hostinrichard cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT bessshay cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT klinebergeric cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT smithjustins cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT passiaspeter cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT schwabfrank cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT lafagerenaud cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter
AT cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter