Cargando…
Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location chan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6963350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879085 |
_version_ | 1783488260893310976 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Han Jo York, Philip J. Elysee, Jonathan C. Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas C. Ames, Christopher P. Mundis, Gregory M. Hostin, Richard Bess, Shay Klineberg, Eric Smith, Justin S. Passias, Peter Schwab, Frank Lafage, Renaud |
author_facet | Kim, Han Jo York, Philip J. Elysee, Jonathan C. Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas C. Ames, Christopher P. Mundis, Gregory M. Hostin, Richard Bess, Shay Klineberg, Eric Smith, Justin S. Passias, Peter Schwab, Frank Lafage, Renaud |
author_sort | Kim, Han Jo |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location changes proximal spinal alignment. METHODS: Patients were grouped by upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV): lower thoracic (LT; T8-L1) or upper thoracic (UT; T1-7). Alignment parameters were compared. Correlation analysis was performed between PJK magnitude and global/cervical alignment. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included; mean age of 63 years, body mass index 28, and 81% female, LT (n = 193) versus UT (n = 176). The rate of radiographic PJK was 49%, higher in the LT group (55% vs 42%, P = .01). The UT group displayed significant differences in all cervical radiographic parameters (P < .05) between PJK versus non-PJK patients, while the LT group displayed significant differences in T1S and C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (CTS). In comparing UT versus LT patients, UT had more posterior global alignment (smaller TPA [T1 pelvic angle], SVA, and larger PT [pelvic tilt]) and larger anterior cervical alignment (greater cSVA [cervical SVA], T1S-CL [T1 slope–cervical lordosis] mismatch, CTS) compared to LT. Correlation analysis of PJK magnitude and location demonstrated a correlation with increases in CL, T1S, and CTS in the UT group. In the LT group, PT increased with PJK angle (r = 0.17) and no significant correlations were noted to SVA, cSVA, or T1S-CL. CONCLUSIONS: PJK location influences compensation mechanisms of the cervical and thoracic spine. LT PJK results in increased PT and CL with decreased CTS. UT PJK increases CL to counter increases in T1S with continued T1S-CL mismatch and elevated cSVA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6963350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69633502020-01-30 Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? Kim, Han Jo York, Philip J. Elysee, Jonathan C. Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas C. Ames, Christopher P. Mundis, Gregory M. Hostin, Richard Bess, Shay Klineberg, Eric Smith, Justin S. Passias, Peter Schwab, Frank Lafage, Renaud Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location changes proximal spinal alignment. METHODS: Patients were grouped by upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV): lower thoracic (LT; T8-L1) or upper thoracic (UT; T1-7). Alignment parameters were compared. Correlation analysis was performed between PJK magnitude and global/cervical alignment. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included; mean age of 63 years, body mass index 28, and 81% female, LT (n = 193) versus UT (n = 176). The rate of radiographic PJK was 49%, higher in the LT group (55% vs 42%, P = .01). The UT group displayed significant differences in all cervical radiographic parameters (P < .05) between PJK versus non-PJK patients, while the LT group displayed significant differences in T1S and C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (CTS). In comparing UT versus LT patients, UT had more posterior global alignment (smaller TPA [T1 pelvic angle], SVA, and larger PT [pelvic tilt]) and larger anterior cervical alignment (greater cSVA [cervical SVA], T1S-CL [T1 slope–cervical lordosis] mismatch, CTS) compared to LT. Correlation analysis of PJK magnitude and location demonstrated a correlation with increases in CL, T1S, and CTS in the UT group. In the LT group, PT increased with PJK angle (r = 0.17) and no significant correlations were noted to SVA, cSVA, or T1S-CL. CONCLUSIONS: PJK location influences compensation mechanisms of the cervical and thoracic spine. LT PJK results in increased PT and CL with decreased CTS. UT PJK increases CL to counter increases in T1S with continued T1S-CL mismatch and elevated cSVA. SAGE Publications 2019-09-30 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6963350/ /pubmed/32002344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879085 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kim, Han Jo York, Philip J. Elysee, Jonathan C. Shaffrey, Christopher Burton, Douglas C. Ames, Christopher P. Mundis, Gregory M. Hostin, Richard Bess, Shay Klineberg, Eric Smith, Justin S. Passias, Peter Schwab, Frank Lafage, Renaud Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? |
title | Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? |
title_full | Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? |
title_fullStr | Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? |
title_short | Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter? |
title_sort | cervical, thoracic, and spinopelvic compensation after proximal junctional kyphosis (pjk): does location of pjk matter? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6963350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhanjo cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT yorkphilipj cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT elyseejonathanc cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT shaffreychristopher cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT burtondouglasc cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT ameschristopherp cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT mundisgregorym cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT hostinrichard cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT bessshay cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT klinebergeric cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT smithjustins cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT passiaspeter cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT schwabfrank cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT lafagerenaud cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter AT cervicalthoracicandspinopelviccompensationafterproximaljunctionalkyphosispjkdoeslocationofpjkmatter |