Cargando…

Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator’s ability to assess the functional visual performance in warfighters conducting civilian and military tasks. METHODS: Thirty service members, aged 25–35 years old with a best corrected distance visual acuity (VA) better than o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, Denise S., Sia, Rose K., Eaddy, Jennifer B., Logan, Lorie A., Familoni, Jide O., Beydoun, Hind, Rodgers, Samantha B., Rivers, Bruce A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8
_version_ 1783488433982799872
author Ryan, Denise S.
Sia, Rose K.
Eaddy, Jennifer B.
Logan, Lorie A.
Familoni, Jide O.
Beydoun, Hind
Rodgers, Samantha B.
Rivers, Bruce A.
author_facet Ryan, Denise S.
Sia, Rose K.
Eaddy, Jennifer B.
Logan, Lorie A.
Familoni, Jide O.
Beydoun, Hind
Rodgers, Samantha B.
Rivers, Bruce A.
author_sort Ryan, Denise S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator’s ability to assess the functional visual performance in warfighters conducting civilian and military tasks. METHODS: Thirty service members, aged 25–35 years old with a best corrected distance visual acuity (VA) better than or equal to 20/20 or logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.00, were randomized to locate and identify road signs and mock improvised explosive devices (IEDs) under either daytime conditions or with infrared imagery, with (cc) and without (sc) wearing their habitual correction. Participants also underwent binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) visual assessment, refraction, contrast sensitivity testing and wavefront aberrometry. RESULTS: The mean age was 28.47 years. The manifest spherical equivalent was − 3.16 ± 1.75 diopters (D), the UDVA in both eyes (OU) was logMAR 0.83 ± 0.47, and the CDVA OU was − 0.11 ± 0.06. For VIPER, the mean difference in the detection distance (DD) for road signs ccDD vs. scDD was 76.7 ± 52.8 m (P < 0.001). The average difference in identification distance (ID) ccID vs. scID was 13.9 ± 6.3 m (P < 0.001). The mean accuracies were 83.5 and 27.9% for cc and sc, respectively (P < 0.001). The regression analysis indicated that a 1.6 m change in the distance accounts for a 1% change in the accuracy (P = 0.002). Without correction, a 4.1 m change accounts for a 1% change in the accuracy (P < 0.001). The average IED ccDD was 29.9 ± 8.2 m, and that for scDD was 13.2 ± 13.6 m (P < 0.001). The average IED ccID was 32.2 ± 6.2 m and that for the scID was 7.4 ± 10.3 m (P < 0.001). The mean IED identification accuracy was 46.7 and 11.4% for cc and sc, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results reflect VIPER’s ability to assess functional visual performance when detecting and identifying signs and IEDs. Furthermore, VIPER is able to detect performance changes with and without correction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6964099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69640992020-01-22 Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator Ryan, Denise S. Sia, Rose K. Eaddy, Jennifer B. Logan, Lorie A. Familoni, Jide O. Beydoun, Hind Rodgers, Samantha B. Rivers, Bruce A. Mil Med Res Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator’s ability to assess the functional visual performance in warfighters conducting civilian and military tasks. METHODS: Thirty service members, aged 25–35 years old with a best corrected distance visual acuity (VA) better than or equal to 20/20 or logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.00, were randomized to locate and identify road signs and mock improvised explosive devices (IEDs) under either daytime conditions or with infrared imagery, with (cc) and without (sc) wearing their habitual correction. Participants also underwent binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) visual assessment, refraction, contrast sensitivity testing and wavefront aberrometry. RESULTS: The mean age was 28.47 years. The manifest spherical equivalent was − 3.16 ± 1.75 diopters (D), the UDVA in both eyes (OU) was logMAR 0.83 ± 0.47, and the CDVA OU was − 0.11 ± 0.06. For VIPER, the mean difference in the detection distance (DD) for road signs ccDD vs. scDD was 76.7 ± 52.8 m (P < 0.001). The average difference in identification distance (ID) ccID vs. scID was 13.9 ± 6.3 m (P < 0.001). The mean accuracies were 83.5 and 27.9% for cc and sc, respectively (P < 0.001). The regression analysis indicated that a 1.6 m change in the distance accounts for a 1% change in the accuracy (P = 0.002). Without correction, a 4.1 m change accounts for a 1% change in the accuracy (P < 0.001). The average IED ccDD was 29.9 ± 8.2 m, and that for scDD was 13.2 ± 13.6 m (P < 0.001). The average IED ccID was 32.2 ± 6.2 m and that for the scID was 7.4 ± 10.3 m (P < 0.001). The mean IED identification accuracy was 46.7 and 11.4% for cc and sc, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results reflect VIPER’s ability to assess functional visual performance when detecting and identifying signs and IEDs. Furthermore, VIPER is able to detect performance changes with and without correction. BioMed Central 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6964099/ /pubmed/31941553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ryan, Denise S.
Sia, Rose K.
Eaddy, Jennifer B.
Logan, Lorie A.
Familoni, Jide O.
Beydoun, Hind
Rodgers, Samantha B.
Rivers, Bruce A.
Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator
title Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator
title_full Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator
title_fullStr Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator
title_short Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator
title_sort preliminary evaluation of the vision performance (viper) simulator
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ryandenises preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT siarosek preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT eaddyjenniferb preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT loganloriea preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT familonijideo preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT beydounhind preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT rodgerssamanthab preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator
AT riversbrucea preliminaryevaluationofthevisionperformancevipersimulator