Cargando…

Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council

BACKGROUND: The emphasis on Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is taking on new importance as the profession of nursing strives to meet the challenge of defining the direction of health care, promoting optimal outcomes, and ensuring patient safety. Therefore, Evidence-Based Practice has never been more i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozga, Dorota, Jędrzejczyk-Cwanek, Marzena, Woźniak, Krystyna, Niemczyk, Edyta, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956119897566
_version_ 1783488450382528512
author Ozga, Dorota
Jędrzejczyk-Cwanek, Marzena
Woźniak, Krystyna
Niemczyk, Edyta
Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
author_facet Ozga, Dorota
Jędrzejczyk-Cwanek, Marzena
Woźniak, Krystyna
Niemczyk, Edyta
Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
author_sort Ozga, Dorota
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The emphasis on Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is taking on new importance as the profession of nursing strives to meet the challenge of defining the direction of health care, promoting optimal outcomes, and ensuring patient safety. Therefore, Evidence-Based Practice has never been more important to nursing than in the current health-care environment. OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to assess the knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes of nurses as compared with Evidence-Based Practice in relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council. METHODS: The study covered involved a total of 236 nurses who participated in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation course over a period of 12 months. The nurses who qualified for the study followed a complete study registration procedure. RESULTS: The current findings show that the lowest score was achieved in the domain of attitude toward selected Evidence-Based Practice aspects in professional work. Detailed domain questions concerned nurses’ Evidence-Based Practice and its limitations related to procedures, the lack of equipment and personnel issues, as well as the lack of scientific evidence. Furthermore, nurses saw clinical experience as being more valuable than research findings for practical decision-making than research findings, and, according to the respondents, they presented opinions that the best way to assess the effectiveness of an action was through clinical experience. In addition, the nurses gave low scores and tended to underestimate the critical literature review aspect within the domain, along with its significance for the general professional practice, believing that search for scientific evidence alone does not apply into their professional work. CONCLUSIONS: The validated Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice profile questionnaire is a reliable instrument. The study demonstrates that nurses are facing a multitude of limitations due to procedures, the lack of equipment, and personnel issues. Currently perceived as very poor, the ability to make critical assessments and synthesize evidence should be improved. According to the nurses, clinical experience cannot be the only and the best way to assess the effectiveness of a given measure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6964245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69642452020-01-30 Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council Ozga, Dorota Jędrzejczyk-Cwanek, Marzena Woźniak, Krystyna Niemczyk, Edyta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Glob Adv Health Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The emphasis on Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is taking on new importance as the profession of nursing strives to meet the challenge of defining the direction of health care, promoting optimal outcomes, and ensuring patient safety. Therefore, Evidence-Based Practice has never been more important to nursing than in the current health-care environment. OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to assess the knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes of nurses as compared with Evidence-Based Practice in relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council. METHODS: The study covered involved a total of 236 nurses who participated in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation course over a period of 12 months. The nurses who qualified for the study followed a complete study registration procedure. RESULTS: The current findings show that the lowest score was achieved in the domain of attitude toward selected Evidence-Based Practice aspects in professional work. Detailed domain questions concerned nurses’ Evidence-Based Practice and its limitations related to procedures, the lack of equipment and personnel issues, as well as the lack of scientific evidence. Furthermore, nurses saw clinical experience as being more valuable than research findings for practical decision-making than research findings, and, according to the respondents, they presented opinions that the best way to assess the effectiveness of an action was through clinical experience. In addition, the nurses gave low scores and tended to underestimate the critical literature review aspect within the domain, along with its significance for the general professional practice, believing that search for scientific evidence alone does not apply into their professional work. CONCLUSIONS: The validated Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice profile questionnaire is a reliable instrument. The study demonstrates that nurses are facing a multitude of limitations due to procedures, the lack of equipment, and personnel issues. Currently perceived as very poor, the ability to make critical assessments and synthesize evidence should be improved. According to the nurses, clinical experience cannot be the only and the best way to assess the effectiveness of a given measure. SAGE Publications 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6964245/ /pubmed/32002311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956119897566 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ozga, Dorota
Jędrzejczyk-Cwanek, Marzena
Woźniak, Krystyna
Niemczyk, Edyta
Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council
title Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council
title_full Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council
title_fullStr Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council
title_short Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council
title_sort knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes of polish nurses as compared with evidence-based practice in relation to the guidelines of the european resuscitation council
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956119897566
work_keys_str_mv AT ozgadorota knowledgebehaviorsandattitudesofpolishnursesascomparedwithevidencebasedpracticeinrelationtotheguidelinesoftheeuropeanresuscitationcouncil
AT jedrzejczykcwanekmarzena knowledgebehaviorsandattitudesofpolishnursesascomparedwithevidencebasedpracticeinrelationtotheguidelinesoftheeuropeanresuscitationcouncil
AT wozniakkrystyna knowledgebehaviorsandattitudesofpolishnursesascomparedwithevidencebasedpracticeinrelationtotheguidelinesoftheeuropeanresuscitationcouncil
AT niemczykedyta knowledgebehaviorsandattitudesofpolishnursesascomparedwithevidencebasedpracticeinrelationtotheguidelinesoftheeuropeanresuscitationcouncil
AT medrzyckadabrowskawioletta knowledgebehaviorsandattitudesofpolishnursesascomparedwithevidencebasedpracticeinrelationtotheguidelinesoftheeuropeanresuscitationcouncil