Cargando…
A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region
PURPOSE: Radiation for superficial tumours of the head and neck region can be given either by brachytherapy or electrons. Brachytherapy (BT), due to rapid dose fall-off and minor set-up errors, should be superior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for treatment of lesions in difficult locations su...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969913 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.90233 |
_version_ | 1783488470540353536 |
---|---|
author | Sen, Souransu Bandyopadhyay, Anis Pal, Jayanta Kumar Ghosh, Arnab Kumar Deb, Asit Ranjan |
author_facet | Sen, Souransu Bandyopadhyay, Anis Pal, Jayanta Kumar Ghosh, Arnab Kumar Deb, Asit Ranjan |
author_sort | Sen, Souransu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Radiation for superficial tumours of the head and neck region can be given either by brachytherapy or electrons. Brachytherapy (BT), due to rapid dose fall-off and minor set-up errors, should be superior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for treatment of lesions in difficult locations such as the nose and earlobe. The present study is a dosimetric comparison of computed tomography (CT)-based mould brachytherapy treatment plans with 3D conformal electron beam therapy in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From December 2017 to November 2018 10 patients with NMSC of the head and neck region (forehead, nose, cheek) who underwent adjuvant radiation with HDR brachytherapy (BT) with a surface mould individual applicator were enrolled for analysis. We evaluated dose coverage by minimal dose to 90% of planning target volume (PTV, D(90)), volumes of PTV receiving 90-150% of prescribed dose (PD) (VPTV(90-150)), conformal index for 90% and 100% of PD (COIN(90), COIN(100)), dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose nonuniformity ratio (DNR), and exposure of organs at risk (OARs) (eyes, lens, underlying bone and skin). Prospectively, we created CT-based treatment plans for electron beam therapy. We compared conformity (COIN(90), COIN(100)), dose coverage of PTV (D(90), VPTV(90), VPTV(100)), volumes of body receiving 10-90% of PD (V(10)-V(90)), doses to OARs (D(0.1cc) and D(2cc)) of BT and electron plans. RESULTS: We obtained mean BT-DHI 0.81, BT-DNR 0.608, Electron-DHI 1.25. We observed no significant differences in VPTV(90,100) and D(90) between BT and electron beam. Mean BT-VPTV(125,150) were significantly higher than Electron-VPTV(100,125). COIN(90) was superior for BT plans. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based surface mould brachytherapy results in better conformity of superficial lesions on small, irregular surfaces such as the nose and inner canthus than electrons with a slightly higher skin dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6964343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69643432020-01-22 A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region Sen, Souransu Bandyopadhyay, Anis Pal, Jayanta Kumar Ghosh, Arnab Kumar Deb, Asit Ranjan J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Radiation for superficial tumours of the head and neck region can be given either by brachytherapy or electrons. Brachytherapy (BT), due to rapid dose fall-off and minor set-up errors, should be superior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for treatment of lesions in difficult locations such as the nose and earlobe. The present study is a dosimetric comparison of computed tomography (CT)-based mould brachytherapy treatment plans with 3D conformal electron beam therapy in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From December 2017 to November 2018 10 patients with NMSC of the head and neck region (forehead, nose, cheek) who underwent adjuvant radiation with HDR brachytherapy (BT) with a surface mould individual applicator were enrolled for analysis. We evaluated dose coverage by minimal dose to 90% of planning target volume (PTV, D(90)), volumes of PTV receiving 90-150% of prescribed dose (PD) (VPTV(90-150)), conformal index for 90% and 100% of PD (COIN(90), COIN(100)), dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose nonuniformity ratio (DNR), and exposure of organs at risk (OARs) (eyes, lens, underlying bone and skin). Prospectively, we created CT-based treatment plans for electron beam therapy. We compared conformity (COIN(90), COIN(100)), dose coverage of PTV (D(90), VPTV(90), VPTV(100)), volumes of body receiving 10-90% of PD (V(10)-V(90)), doses to OARs (D(0.1cc) and D(2cc)) of BT and electron plans. RESULTS: We obtained mean BT-DHI 0.81, BT-DNR 0.608, Electron-DHI 1.25. We observed no significant differences in VPTV(90,100) and D(90) between BT and electron beam. Mean BT-VPTV(125,150) were significantly higher than Electron-VPTV(100,125). COIN(90) was superior for BT plans. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based surface mould brachytherapy results in better conformity of superficial lesions on small, irregular surfaces such as the nose and inner canthus than electrons with a slightly higher skin dose. Termedia Publishing House 2019-12-01 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6964343/ /pubmed/31969913 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.90233 Text en Copyright © 2019 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sen, Souransu Bandyopadhyay, Anis Pal, Jayanta Kumar Ghosh, Arnab Kumar Deb, Asit Ranjan A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
title | A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
title_full | A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
title_fullStr | A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
title_full_unstemmed | A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
title_short | A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
title_sort | dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969913 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.90233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sensouransu adosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT bandyopadhyayanis adosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT paljayantakumar adosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT ghosharnabkumar adosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT debasitranjan adosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT sensouransu dosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT bandyopadhyayanis dosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT paljayantakumar dosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT ghosharnabkumar dosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion AT debasitranjan dosimetricstudyofelectronbeamtherapyvshighdoseratemouldbrachytherapyinadjuvanttreatmentofnonmelanomaskincarcinomasoftheheadandneckregion |