Cargando…

Post-neoadjuvant cellular dissociation grading based on tumour budding and cell nest size is associated with therapy response and survival in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Cellular Dissociation Grade (CDG) composed of tumour budding and cell nest size has been shown to independently predict prognosis in pre-therapeutic biopsies and primary resections of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of CDG in E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jesinghaus, Moritz, Boxberg, Melanie, Wilhelm, Dirk, Münch, Stefan, Dapper, Hendrik, Quante, Michael, Schlag, Christoph, Lange, Sebastian, Budczies, Jan, Konukiewitz, Björn, Mollenhauer, Martin, Schlitter, Anna Melissa, Becker, Karl Friedrich, Feith, Marcus, Friess, Helmut, Steiger, Katja, Combs, Stephanie E., Weichert, Wilko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31690830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0623-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cellular Dissociation Grade (CDG) composed of tumour budding and cell nest size has been shown to independently predict prognosis in pre-therapeutic biopsies and primary resections of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of CDG in ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: We evaluated cell nest size and tumour budding activity in 122 post-neoadjuvant ESCC resections, correlated the results with tumour regression groups and patient survival and compared the results with data from primary resected cases as well as pre-therapeutic biopsies. RESULTS: CDG remained stable when results from pre-therapeutic biopsies and post-therapeutic resections from the same patient were compared. CDG was associated with therapy response and a strong predictor of overall, disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in univariate analysis and—besides metastasis—remained the only significant survival predictor for DSS and DFS in multivariate analysis. Multivariate DFS hazard ratios reached 3.3 for CDG-G2 and 4.9 for CDG-G3 neoplasms compared with CDG-G1 carcinomas (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: CDG is the only morphology-based grading algorithm published to date, which in concert with regression grading, is able to contribute relevant prognostic information in the post-neoadjuvant setting of ESCC.