Cargando…
Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models
Feedback from radiologists indicated that differences in image appearance and noise impeded reading of post‐contrast computed tomography (CT) scans from an updated CT scanner that was recently added to a fleet of existing scanners from the same vendor, despite using identically named reconstruction...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31859454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12798 |
_version_ | 1783488513143996416 |
---|---|
author | Einstein, Samuel A. Rong, Xiujiang John Jensen, Corey T. Liu, Xinming |
author_facet | Einstein, Samuel A. Rong, Xiujiang John Jensen, Corey T. Liu, Xinming |
author_sort | Einstein, Samuel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feedback from radiologists indicated that differences in image appearance and noise impeded reading of post‐contrast computed tomography (CT) scans from an updated CT scanner that was recently added to a fleet of existing scanners from the same vendor, despite using identically named reconstruction algorithms. The goals of this work were to quantify and possibly standardize image quality on the new and an existing scanner using phantom images. Three months of daily quality control images were analyzed to determine the mean CT number and noise magnitude in a water phantom. Next, subtraction images from the uniformity section of an American College of Radiology CT phantom were used to generate noise power spectra for both scanners. Then, a semi‐anthropomorphic liver phantom was imaged with both scanners in triplicate using identical body protocols to quantify differences CT number and noise magnitude. Finally, the scanner dependence of CT number and noise magnitude on material attenuation was quantified using a multi‐energy CT phantom with 15 material inserts. Significant differences between scanners were determined using a paired or Welch's t test as appropriate. In daily quality control images, the new scanner exhibited slightly higher CT number (0.697 vs. 0.412, P < 0.001, n = 85) and slightly lower noise magnitude (4.85 vs. 4.94, P < 0.001, n = 85). Measured NPS was not significantly different between the existing and new scanners. Interestingly, it was observed that the noise magnitude from the new scanner increased with increasing material attenuation in both the liver (P = 0.008) and multi‐energy (P < 0.001) phantoms. Using an alternate reconstruction algorithm with the new scanner eliminated this deviation at high material attenuations. While standard noise evaluation in a water phantom was unable to discern differences between the scanners, more comprehensive testing with higher attenuation materials allowed for the characterization and homogenization of image quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6964752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69647522020-01-27 Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models Einstein, Samuel A. Rong, Xiujiang John Jensen, Corey T. Liu, Xinming J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Feedback from radiologists indicated that differences in image appearance and noise impeded reading of post‐contrast computed tomography (CT) scans from an updated CT scanner that was recently added to a fleet of existing scanners from the same vendor, despite using identically named reconstruction algorithms. The goals of this work were to quantify and possibly standardize image quality on the new and an existing scanner using phantom images. Three months of daily quality control images were analyzed to determine the mean CT number and noise magnitude in a water phantom. Next, subtraction images from the uniformity section of an American College of Radiology CT phantom were used to generate noise power spectra for both scanners. Then, a semi‐anthropomorphic liver phantom was imaged with both scanners in triplicate using identical body protocols to quantify differences CT number and noise magnitude. Finally, the scanner dependence of CT number and noise magnitude on material attenuation was quantified using a multi‐energy CT phantom with 15 material inserts. Significant differences between scanners were determined using a paired or Welch's t test as appropriate. In daily quality control images, the new scanner exhibited slightly higher CT number (0.697 vs. 0.412, P < 0.001, n = 85) and slightly lower noise magnitude (4.85 vs. 4.94, P < 0.001, n = 85). Measured NPS was not significantly different between the existing and new scanners. Interestingly, it was observed that the noise magnitude from the new scanner increased with increasing material attenuation in both the liver (P = 0.008) and multi‐energy (P < 0.001) phantoms. Using an alternate reconstruction algorithm with the new scanner eliminated this deviation at high material attenuations. While standard noise evaluation in a water phantom was unable to discern differences between the scanners, more comprehensive testing with higher attenuation materials allowed for the characterization and homogenization of image quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6964752/ /pubmed/31859454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12798 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Einstein, Samuel A. Rong, Xiujiang John Jensen, Corey T. Liu, Xinming Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models |
title | Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models |
title_full | Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models |
title_fullStr | Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models |
title_short | Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models |
title_sort | quantification and homogenization of image noise between two ct scanner models |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31859454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT einsteinsamuela quantificationandhomogenizationofimagenoisebetweentwoctscannermodels AT rongxiujiangjohn quantificationandhomogenizationofimagenoisebetweentwoctscannermodels AT jensencoreyt quantificationandhomogenizationofimagenoisebetweentwoctscannermodels AT liuxinming quantificationandhomogenizationofimagenoisebetweentwoctscannermodels |