Cargando…
Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging
Continuous bed motion (CBM) was recently introduced as an alternative to step‐and‐shoot (SS) mode for PET/CT data acquisition. In CBM, the patient is continuously advanced into the scanner at a preset speed, whereas in SS, the patient is imaged in overlapping bed positions. Previous investigations h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31816183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12785 |
_version_ | 1783488514382364672 |
---|---|
author | Meier, Joseph G. Erasmus, Jeremy J. Gladish, Gregory W. Peterson, Christine B. Diab, Radwan H. Mawlawi, Osama R. |
author_facet | Meier, Joseph G. Erasmus, Jeremy J. Gladish, Gregory W. Peterson, Christine B. Diab, Radwan H. Mawlawi, Osama R. |
author_sort | Meier, Joseph G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Continuous bed motion (CBM) was recently introduced as an alternative to step‐and‐shoot (SS) mode for PET/CT data acquisition. In CBM, the patient is continuously advanced into the scanner at a preset speed, whereas in SS, the patient is imaged in overlapping bed positions. Previous investigations have shown that patients preferred CBM over SS for PET data acquisition. In this study, we investigated the effect of CBM versus SS on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction. One hundred patients referred for PET/CT were scanned using a Siemens mCT scanner. Patient respiratory waveforms were recorded using an Anzai system and analyzed using four methods: Methods 1 and 2 measured the coefficient of variation (COV) of the respiratory cycle duration (RCD) and amplitude (RCA). Method 3 measured the respiratory frequency signal prominence (RSP) and method 4 measured the width of the HDChest optimal gate (OG) window when using a 35% duty cycle. Waveform analysis was performed over the abdominothoracic region which exhibited the greatest respiratory motion and the results were compared between CBM and SS. Respiratory motion correction was assessed by comparing the ratios of SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR of focal FDG uptake, as well as Radiologists’ visual assessment of corresponding image quality of motion corrected and uncorrected images for both acquisition modes. The respiratory waveforms analysis showed that the RCD and RCA COV were 3.7% and 33.3% lower for CBM compared to SS, respectively, while the RSP and OG were 30.5% and 2.0% higher, respectively. Image analysis on the other hand showed that SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR were 8.5%, 4.5%, and 3.4% higher for SS compared to CBM, respectively, while the Radiologists’ visual comparison showed similar image quality between acquisition modes. However, none of the results showed statistically significant differences between SS and CBM, suggesting that motion correction is not impacted by acquisition mode. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6964757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69647572020-01-27 Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging Meier, Joseph G. Erasmus, Jeremy J. Gladish, Gregory W. Peterson, Christine B. Diab, Radwan H. Mawlawi, Osama R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Continuous bed motion (CBM) was recently introduced as an alternative to step‐and‐shoot (SS) mode for PET/CT data acquisition. In CBM, the patient is continuously advanced into the scanner at a preset speed, whereas in SS, the patient is imaged in overlapping bed positions. Previous investigations have shown that patients preferred CBM over SS for PET data acquisition. In this study, we investigated the effect of CBM versus SS on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction. One hundred patients referred for PET/CT were scanned using a Siemens mCT scanner. Patient respiratory waveforms were recorded using an Anzai system and analyzed using four methods: Methods 1 and 2 measured the coefficient of variation (COV) of the respiratory cycle duration (RCD) and amplitude (RCA). Method 3 measured the respiratory frequency signal prominence (RSP) and method 4 measured the width of the HDChest optimal gate (OG) window when using a 35% duty cycle. Waveform analysis was performed over the abdominothoracic region which exhibited the greatest respiratory motion and the results were compared between CBM and SS. Respiratory motion correction was assessed by comparing the ratios of SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR of focal FDG uptake, as well as Radiologists’ visual assessment of corresponding image quality of motion corrected and uncorrected images for both acquisition modes. The respiratory waveforms analysis showed that the RCD and RCA COV were 3.7% and 33.3% lower for CBM compared to SS, respectively, while the RSP and OG were 30.5% and 2.0% higher, respectively. Image analysis on the other hand showed that SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR were 8.5%, 4.5%, and 3.4% higher for SS compared to CBM, respectively, while the Radiologists’ visual comparison showed similar image quality between acquisition modes. However, none of the results showed statistically significant differences between SS and CBM, suggesting that motion correction is not impacted by acquisition mode. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6964757/ /pubmed/31816183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12785 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Meier, Joseph G. Erasmus, Jeremy J. Gladish, Gregory W. Peterson, Christine B. Diab, Radwan H. Mawlawi, Osama R. Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging |
title | Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging |
title_full | Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging |
title_fullStr | Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging |
title_short | Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging |
title_sort | characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in pet/ct imaging |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31816183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meierjosephg characterizationofcontinuousbedmotioneffectsonpatientbreathingandrespiratorymotioncorrectioninpetctimaging AT erasmusjeremyj characterizationofcontinuousbedmotioneffectsonpatientbreathingandrespiratorymotioncorrectioninpetctimaging AT gladishgregoryw characterizationofcontinuousbedmotioneffectsonpatientbreathingandrespiratorymotioncorrectioninpetctimaging AT petersonchristineb characterizationofcontinuousbedmotioneffectsonpatientbreathingandrespiratorymotioncorrectioninpetctimaging AT diabradwanh characterizationofcontinuousbedmotioneffectsonpatientbreathingandrespiratorymotioncorrectioninpetctimaging AT mawlawiosamar characterizationofcontinuousbedmotioneffectsonpatientbreathingandrespiratorymotioncorrectioninpetctimaging |