Cargando…

A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever

BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries especially in children ≤5 years old. Although the widely available unconjugated Vi polysaccharide vaccines are efficacious, they confer limited, short-term protection and are not approved for you...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cartee, Robert T., Thanawastien, Ann, Griffin IV, Thomas J., Mekalanos, John J., Bart, Stephan, Killeen, Kevin P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31905228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007912
_version_ 1783488548192649216
author Cartee, Robert T.
Thanawastien, Ann
Griffin IV, Thomas J.
Mekalanos, John J.
Bart, Stephan
Killeen, Kevin P.
author_facet Cartee, Robert T.
Thanawastien, Ann
Griffin IV, Thomas J.
Mekalanos, John J.
Bart, Stephan
Killeen, Kevin P.
author_sort Cartee, Robert T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries especially in children ≤5 years old. Although the widely available unconjugated Vi polysaccharide vaccines are efficacious, they confer limited, short-term protection and are not approved for young children or infants. Vi conjugate vaccines, however, are now licensed in several typhoid endemic countries for use in children >6 months of age. As an alternative to conjugate vaccines, Matrivax has applied its novel ‘virtual conjugation’ Protein Capsular Matrix Vaccine (PCMV) technology to manufacture Typhax, which is composed of Vi polysaccharide entrapped in a cross-linked CRM197 matrix. METHODOLOGY: A randomized, double-blinded, dose escalating Phase 1 study was performed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of three dose levels of aluminum phosphate adjuvanted Typhax (0.5, 2.5, or 10 μg of Vi antigen) to the FDA licensed vaccine, Typhim Vi, and placebo. Groups of 15 healthy adult subjects aged 18 to 55 years were randomized and received Typhax, Typhim Vi, or placebo at a ratio of 9:3:3. Typhax and placebo were administered in a two-dose regimen (Days 0 and 28) while Typhim Vi was administered as a single-dose on Day 0 with a placebo administered on Day 28. All doses were administered as a 0.5 mL intramuscular (IM) injection in a blinded fashion. The anti-Vi IgG antibody response was determined preimmunization (Day 0) and on Days 14, 28, 42, and 180 by ELISA. Seroconversion was defined as a titer 4-fold or greater above baseline. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All Typhax vaccine regimens were well tolerated and adverse events were low in number and primarily characterized as mild in intensity and similar in incidence across the treatment groups. Reactogenicity, primarily pain and tenderness at the injection site, was observed in both the Typhax and Typhim Vi treatment groups; a modest increase in incidence was observed with increasing Typhax doses. Following one dose of Typhax, seroconversion rates at day 28 were 12.5%, 77.8%, 66.7% at the 0.5, 2.5, and 10 μg dose levels, respectively, compared to 55.6% and 0% in the Typhim Vi and placebo groups, respectively. A second dose of Typhax on Day 28 did not elicit a significant increase in GMT or seroconversion at Day 42 or Day 180 at any dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, the results from this randomized phase 1 clinical trial indicate that Typhax is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic. After a single dose, Typhax at the 2.5 and 10 μg dose levels elicited comparable anti-Vi IgG titers and seroconversion rates as a single dose of Typhim Vi (25 μg dose). A second dose of Typhax at Day 28 did not elicit a booster response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03926455.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6964911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69649112020-01-26 A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever Cartee, Robert T. Thanawastien, Ann Griffin IV, Thomas J. Mekalanos, John J. Bart, Stephan Killeen, Kevin P. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries especially in children ≤5 years old. Although the widely available unconjugated Vi polysaccharide vaccines are efficacious, they confer limited, short-term protection and are not approved for young children or infants. Vi conjugate vaccines, however, are now licensed in several typhoid endemic countries for use in children >6 months of age. As an alternative to conjugate vaccines, Matrivax has applied its novel ‘virtual conjugation’ Protein Capsular Matrix Vaccine (PCMV) technology to manufacture Typhax, which is composed of Vi polysaccharide entrapped in a cross-linked CRM197 matrix. METHODOLOGY: A randomized, double-blinded, dose escalating Phase 1 study was performed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of three dose levels of aluminum phosphate adjuvanted Typhax (0.5, 2.5, or 10 μg of Vi antigen) to the FDA licensed vaccine, Typhim Vi, and placebo. Groups of 15 healthy adult subjects aged 18 to 55 years were randomized and received Typhax, Typhim Vi, or placebo at a ratio of 9:3:3. Typhax and placebo were administered in a two-dose regimen (Days 0 and 28) while Typhim Vi was administered as a single-dose on Day 0 with a placebo administered on Day 28. All doses were administered as a 0.5 mL intramuscular (IM) injection in a blinded fashion. The anti-Vi IgG antibody response was determined preimmunization (Day 0) and on Days 14, 28, 42, and 180 by ELISA. Seroconversion was defined as a titer 4-fold or greater above baseline. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All Typhax vaccine regimens were well tolerated and adverse events were low in number and primarily characterized as mild in intensity and similar in incidence across the treatment groups. Reactogenicity, primarily pain and tenderness at the injection site, was observed in both the Typhax and Typhim Vi treatment groups; a modest increase in incidence was observed with increasing Typhax doses. Following one dose of Typhax, seroconversion rates at day 28 were 12.5%, 77.8%, 66.7% at the 0.5, 2.5, and 10 μg dose levels, respectively, compared to 55.6% and 0% in the Typhim Vi and placebo groups, respectively. A second dose of Typhax on Day 28 did not elicit a significant increase in GMT or seroconversion at Day 42 or Day 180 at any dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, the results from this randomized phase 1 clinical trial indicate that Typhax is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic. After a single dose, Typhax at the 2.5 and 10 μg dose levels elicited comparable anti-Vi IgG titers and seroconversion rates as a single dose of Typhim Vi (25 μg dose). A second dose of Typhax at Day 28 did not elicit a booster response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03926455. Public Library of Science 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6964911/ /pubmed/31905228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007912 Text en © 2020 Cartee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cartee, Robert T.
Thanawastien, Ann
Griffin IV, Thomas J.
Mekalanos, John J.
Bart, Stephan
Killeen, Kevin P.
A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
title A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
title_full A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
title_fullStr A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
title_full_unstemmed A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
title_short A phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of Typhax: A novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
title_sort phase 1 randomized safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity study of typhax: a novel protein capsular matrix vaccine candidate for the prevention of typhoid fever
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31905228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007912
work_keys_str_mv AT carteerobertt aphase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT thanawastienann aphase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT griffinivthomasj aphase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT mekalanosjohnj aphase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT bartstephan aphase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT killeenkevinp aphase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT carteerobertt phase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT thanawastienann phase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT griffinivthomasj phase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT mekalanosjohnj phase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT bartstephan phase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever
AT killeenkevinp phase1randomizedsafetyreactogenicityandimmunogenicitystudyoftyphaxanovelproteincapsularmatrixvaccinecandidateforthepreventionoftyphoidfever