Cargando…

Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND: In nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), the optimal volume of adrenaline, the optimal number of hemoclips, and the application of thermal coagulation in determining patient outcomes have not been well studied. AIM: To demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yip, Benjamin Cherng Hann, Sayeed Sajjad, Hossain, Wang, Jie-Xun, Anastassiades, Constantinos P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6965003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064032
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i2.72
_version_ 1783488566082404352
author Yip, Benjamin Cherng Hann
Sayeed Sajjad, Hossain
Wang, Jie-Xun
Anastassiades, Constantinos P
author_facet Yip, Benjamin Cherng Hann
Sayeed Sajjad, Hossain
Wang, Jie-Xun
Anastassiades, Constantinos P
author_sort Yip, Benjamin Cherng Hann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), the optimal volume of adrenaline, the optimal number of hemoclips, and the application of thermal coagulation in determining patient outcomes have not been well studied. AIM: To demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the commonly used endoscopic modalities for the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and various clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients presenting with NVUGIB were retrospectively identified and analyzed. These patients were stratified as follows: (1) > 10 mL of adrenaline injected vs ≤ 10 mL; (2) > 1 hemoclip placed vs ≤ 1 hemoclip; (3) Heater probe used or not; and (4) > 2 treatment modalities used vs ≤ 2. The primary outcomes were rebleeding and the need for repeat endoscopy. The secondary outcomes were the need for surgery, required transfusions, length of hospital stay, death during the same admission period and 30 d mortality. Patients with NVUGIB who required endoscopic therapy were included. Those who did not require endoscopic therapy or were initially treated with surgery or embolization were excluded. RESULTS: In all, 501 patients with NVUGIB were treated. One hundred sixty-one (32.1%) patients needed endoscopic therapy. The injection of < 10 mL of adrenaline was associated with less rebleeding (P < 0.0001), the need for repeat endoscopy (P = 0.001) and a decreased length of hospital stay (P = 0.026). The use of > 2 treatment modalities were associated with increased rebleeding (P = 0.009) and the need for repeat endoscopy (P = 0.048). The placement of > 1 hemoclip was associated with a decreased length of hospital stay (P = 0.044). The rates of surgery and death were low, and there were no other significant differences between the patient groups. CONCLUSION: The more restrictive use of adrenaline and number of endoscopic modalities to treat NVUGIB with the more liberal use of hemoclips was associated with better patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6965003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69650032020-02-16 Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding Yip, Benjamin Cherng Hann Sayeed Sajjad, Hossain Wang, Jie-Xun Anastassiades, Constantinos P World J Gastrointest Endosc Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: In nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), the optimal volume of adrenaline, the optimal number of hemoclips, and the application of thermal coagulation in determining patient outcomes have not been well studied. AIM: To demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the commonly used endoscopic modalities for the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and various clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients presenting with NVUGIB were retrospectively identified and analyzed. These patients were stratified as follows: (1) > 10 mL of adrenaline injected vs ≤ 10 mL; (2) > 1 hemoclip placed vs ≤ 1 hemoclip; (3) Heater probe used or not; and (4) > 2 treatment modalities used vs ≤ 2. The primary outcomes were rebleeding and the need for repeat endoscopy. The secondary outcomes were the need for surgery, required transfusions, length of hospital stay, death during the same admission period and 30 d mortality. Patients with NVUGIB who required endoscopic therapy were included. Those who did not require endoscopic therapy or were initially treated with surgery or embolization were excluded. RESULTS: In all, 501 patients with NVUGIB were treated. One hundred sixty-one (32.1%) patients needed endoscopic therapy. The injection of < 10 mL of adrenaline was associated with less rebleeding (P < 0.0001), the need for repeat endoscopy (P = 0.001) and a decreased length of hospital stay (P = 0.026). The use of > 2 treatment modalities were associated with increased rebleeding (P = 0.009) and the need for repeat endoscopy (P = 0.048). The placement of > 1 hemoclip was associated with a decreased length of hospital stay (P = 0.044). The rates of surgery and death were low, and there were no other significant differences between the patient groups. CONCLUSION: The more restrictive use of adrenaline and number of endoscopic modalities to treat NVUGIB with the more liberal use of hemoclips was associated with better patient outcomes. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-02-16 2020-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6965003/ /pubmed/32064032 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i2.72 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Yip, Benjamin Cherng Hann
Sayeed Sajjad, Hossain
Wang, Jie-Xun
Anastassiades, Constantinos P
Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_fullStr Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_short Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_sort endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6965003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064032
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i2.72
work_keys_str_mv AT yipbenjaminchernghann endoscopictreatmentmodalitiesandoutcomesinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT sayeedsajjadhossain endoscopictreatmentmodalitiesandoutcomesinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT wangjiexun endoscopictreatmentmodalitiesandoutcomesinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT anastassiadesconstantinosp endoscopictreatmentmodalitiesandoutcomesinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleeding