Cargando…

Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods

MAIN CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO(2) concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO(2), representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. ABSTRACT: There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batke, Sven Peter, Yiotis, Charilaos, Elliott-Kingston, Caroline, Holohan, Aidan, McElwain, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6965045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31950281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z
_version_ 1783488574456332288
author Batke, Sven Peter
Yiotis, Charilaos
Elliott-Kingston, Caroline
Holohan, Aidan
McElwain, Jennifer
author_facet Batke, Sven Peter
Yiotis, Charilaos
Elliott-Kingston, Caroline
Holohan, Aidan
McElwain, Jennifer
author_sort Batke, Sven Peter
collection PubMed
description MAIN CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO(2) concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO(2), representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. ABSTRACT: There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO(2) by decreasing their stomatal conductance (g(s)). However, in the majority of CO(2) enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO(2) are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO(2) concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated g(s) responses to simulated decadal increments in CO(2) predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of g(s) may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed Populus tremula, Popolus tremuloides and Sambucus racemosa to four different CO(2) concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO(2); representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO(2) concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO(2). Under natural conditions, maximum operational g(s) is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum g(s) can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO(2). A non-linear decreases in g(s) and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO(2), could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6965045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69650452020-01-30 Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods Batke, Sven Peter Yiotis, Charilaos Elliott-Kingston, Caroline Holohan, Aidan McElwain, Jennifer Planta Original Article MAIN CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO(2) concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO(2), representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. ABSTRACT: There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO(2) by decreasing their stomatal conductance (g(s)). However, in the majority of CO(2) enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO(2) are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO(2) concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated g(s) responses to simulated decadal increments in CO(2) predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of g(s) may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed Populus tremula, Popolus tremuloides and Sambucus racemosa to four different CO(2) concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO(2); representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO(2) concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO(2). Under natural conditions, maximum operational g(s) is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum g(s) can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO(2). A non-linear decreases in g(s) and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO(2), could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6965045/ /pubmed/31950281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Batke, Sven Peter
Yiotis, Charilaos
Elliott-Kingston, Caroline
Holohan, Aidan
McElwain, Jennifer
Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
title Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
title_full Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
title_fullStr Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
title_full_unstemmed Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
title_short Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
title_sort plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric co(2) concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6965045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31950281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z
work_keys_str_mv AT batkesvenpeter plantresponsestodecadalscaleincrementsinatmosphericco2concentrationcomparingtwostomatalconductancesamplingmethods
AT yiotischarilaos plantresponsestodecadalscaleincrementsinatmosphericco2concentrationcomparingtwostomatalconductancesamplingmethods
AT elliottkingstoncaroline plantresponsestodecadalscaleincrementsinatmosphericco2concentrationcomparingtwostomatalconductancesamplingmethods
AT holohanaidan plantresponsestodecadalscaleincrementsinatmosphericco2concentrationcomparingtwostomatalconductancesamplingmethods
AT mcelwainjennifer plantresponsestodecadalscaleincrementsinatmosphericco2concentrationcomparingtwostomatalconductancesamplingmethods