Cargando…

Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To identify different endoscopic techniques for treatment of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) and evaluate treatment results. Methods: Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on endoscopically treated iSGS. Identified interventions included procedures with cold knife...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavrysen, Emilie, Hens, Greet, Delaere, Pierre, Meulemans, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6965146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00075
_version_ 1783488598399516672
author Lavrysen, Emilie
Hens, Greet
Delaere, Pierre
Meulemans, Jeroen
author_facet Lavrysen, Emilie
Hens, Greet
Delaere, Pierre
Meulemans, Jeroen
author_sort Lavrysen, Emilie
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To identify different endoscopic techniques for treatment of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) and evaluate treatment results. Methods: Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on endoscopically treated iSGS. Identified interventions included procedures with cold knife, dilation (rigid or balloon), or laser (CO(2) or Nd:YAG), used in several combinations and supplemented with mitomycin C and/or corticosteroids. Primary endpoint was time interval between successive endoscopic procedures. Secondary endpoints were stenosis recurrence rate, total number of interventions per patient during follow-up, tracheotomy rate, and rate of open surgery. Results: Eighty-six abstracts were reviewed and 15 series were included in the analysis. Mean sample size was 57 subjects (range 10–384, σ 90.84) and mean age was 47 years (range 36–54, σ 4.45). Time interval ranged from 2 to 21 months [weighted mean (WM): 12]. Rate of stenosis recurrence ranged from 40 to 100% (WM: 68%). Mean amount of interventions per patient varied between 1.8 and 8.3 (WM: 3.7). Tracheotomy rate varied between 0 and 26% (WM: 7%) and rate of open surgery varied between 0 and 27% (WM: 10%). Single modality CO(2) lasering showed highest rate of recurrence, highest amount of interventions, and shortest time interval. Combined techniques generated overall better outcomes. Conclusions: A multitude of endoscopic techniques are being used for treating iSGS, all with a considerable recurrence rate. In this review, no superior modality could be identified. Consequently, endoscopic management could be considered a valuable primary treatment option for iSGS, but open surgery still plays an important role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6965146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69651462020-01-29 Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review Lavrysen, Emilie Hens, Greet Delaere, Pierre Meulemans, Jeroen Front Surg Surgery Purpose: To identify different endoscopic techniques for treatment of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) and evaluate treatment results. Methods: Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on endoscopically treated iSGS. Identified interventions included procedures with cold knife, dilation (rigid or balloon), or laser (CO(2) or Nd:YAG), used in several combinations and supplemented with mitomycin C and/or corticosteroids. Primary endpoint was time interval between successive endoscopic procedures. Secondary endpoints were stenosis recurrence rate, total number of interventions per patient during follow-up, tracheotomy rate, and rate of open surgery. Results: Eighty-six abstracts were reviewed and 15 series were included in the analysis. Mean sample size was 57 subjects (range 10–384, σ 90.84) and mean age was 47 years (range 36–54, σ 4.45). Time interval ranged from 2 to 21 months [weighted mean (WM): 12]. Rate of stenosis recurrence ranged from 40 to 100% (WM: 68%). Mean amount of interventions per patient varied between 1.8 and 8.3 (WM: 3.7). Tracheotomy rate varied between 0 and 26% (WM: 7%) and rate of open surgery varied between 0 and 27% (WM: 10%). Single modality CO(2) lasering showed highest rate of recurrence, highest amount of interventions, and shortest time interval. Combined techniques generated overall better outcomes. Conclusions: A multitude of endoscopic techniques are being used for treating iSGS, all with a considerable recurrence rate. In this review, no superior modality could be identified. Consequently, endoscopic management could be considered a valuable primary treatment option for iSGS, but open surgery still plays an important role. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6965146/ /pubmed/31998744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00075 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lavrysen, Hens, Delaere and Meulemans. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Lavrysen, Emilie
Hens, Greet
Delaere, Pierre
Meulemans, Jeroen
Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review
title Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review
title_full Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review
title_short Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review
title_sort endoscopic treatment of idiopathic subglottic stenosis: a systematic review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6965146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00075
work_keys_str_mv AT lavrysenemilie endoscopictreatmentofidiopathicsubglotticstenosisasystematicreview
AT hensgreet endoscopictreatmentofidiopathicsubglotticstenosisasystematicreview
AT delaerepierre endoscopictreatmentofidiopathicsubglotticstenosisasystematicreview
AT meulemansjeroen endoscopictreatmentofidiopathicsubglotticstenosisasystematicreview