Cargando…

The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study

AIMS: Node-positive bladder cancer (NPBC) carries a poor prognosis and has traditionally been treated palliatively. However, surgical series suggest that a subset of NPBC patients can achieve long-term control after cystectomy and lymph node dissection. There is little published data regarding the u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, M.P., Harris, V., Warren-Oseni, K., McDonald, F., McNair, H., Taylor, H., Hansen, V., Sharabiani, M., Thomas, K., Jones, K., Dearnaley, D., Hafeez, S., Huddart, R.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: W.B. Saunders 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31400946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.017
_version_ 1783488711929888768
author Tan, M.P.
Harris, V.
Warren-Oseni, K.
McDonald, F.
McNair, H.
Taylor, H.
Hansen, V.
Sharabiani, M.
Thomas, K.
Jones, K.
Dearnaley, D.
Hafeez, S.
Huddart, R.A.
author_facet Tan, M.P.
Harris, V.
Warren-Oseni, K.
McDonald, F.
McNair, H.
Taylor, H.
Hansen, V.
Sharabiani, M.
Thomas, K.
Jones, K.
Dearnaley, D.
Hafeez, S.
Huddart, R.A.
author_sort Tan, M.P.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Node-positive bladder cancer (NPBC) carries a poor prognosis and has traditionally been treated palliatively. However, surgical series suggest that a subset of NPBC patients can achieve long-term control after cystectomy and lymph node dissection. There is little published data regarding the use of radiotherapy to treat NPBC patients. This is in part due to concerns regarding the toxicity of whole-pelvis radiotherapy using conventional techniques. We hypothesised that, using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the pelvic nodes and bladder could be treated within a radical treatment volume with acceptable toxicity profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Intensity-modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) trial was a phase II single-centre prospective study designed to assess the feasibility of delivering IMRT to treat the bladder and pelvic nodes in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative bladder cancer (NNBC). The primary end point was meeting predetermined dose constraints. Secondary end points included acute and late toxicity, pelvic relapse-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients were recruited and treated between June 2009 and November 2012; 22/38 (58%) had NPBC; 31/38 (81.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 18/38 (47%) received concurrent chemotherapy; 37/38 (97%) patients had radiotherapy planned as per protocol. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary acute toxicity rates were 5.4 and 20.6%, respectively. At 1 year, the grade 3 late toxicity rate was 5%; 1-, 2- and 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival rates were 55, 37 and 26%, respectively. The median overall survival was 1.9 years (95% confidence interval 1.1–3.8) with 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of 68, 50 and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Delivering IMRT to the bladder and pelvic nodes in NPBC and high-risk NNBC is feasible, with low toxicity and low pelvic nodal recurrence rates. Long-term control seems to be achievable in a subset of patients. However, relapse patterns suggest that strategies targeting both local recurrence and the development of distant metastases are required to improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher W.B. Saunders
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69663212020-02-01 The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study Tan, M.P. Harris, V. Warren-Oseni, K. McDonald, F. McNair, H. Taylor, H. Hansen, V. Sharabiani, M. Thomas, K. Jones, K. Dearnaley, D. Hafeez, S. Huddart, R.A. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Article AIMS: Node-positive bladder cancer (NPBC) carries a poor prognosis and has traditionally been treated palliatively. However, surgical series suggest that a subset of NPBC patients can achieve long-term control after cystectomy and lymph node dissection. There is little published data regarding the use of radiotherapy to treat NPBC patients. This is in part due to concerns regarding the toxicity of whole-pelvis radiotherapy using conventional techniques. We hypothesised that, using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the pelvic nodes and bladder could be treated within a radical treatment volume with acceptable toxicity profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Intensity-modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) trial was a phase II single-centre prospective study designed to assess the feasibility of delivering IMRT to treat the bladder and pelvic nodes in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative bladder cancer (NNBC). The primary end point was meeting predetermined dose constraints. Secondary end points included acute and late toxicity, pelvic relapse-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients were recruited and treated between June 2009 and November 2012; 22/38 (58%) had NPBC; 31/38 (81.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 18/38 (47%) received concurrent chemotherapy; 37/38 (97%) patients had radiotherapy planned as per protocol. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary acute toxicity rates were 5.4 and 20.6%, respectively. At 1 year, the grade 3 late toxicity rate was 5%; 1-, 2- and 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival rates were 55, 37 and 26%, respectively. The median overall survival was 1.9 years (95% confidence interval 1.1–3.8) with 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of 68, 50 and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Delivering IMRT to the bladder and pelvic nodes in NPBC and high-risk NNBC is feasible, with low toxicity and low pelvic nodal recurrence rates. Long-term control seems to be achievable in a subset of patients. However, relapse patterns suggest that strategies targeting both local recurrence and the development of distant metastases are required to improve patient outcomes. W.B. Saunders 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6966321/ /pubmed/31400946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.017 Text en © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tan, M.P.
Harris, V.
Warren-Oseni, K.
McDonald, F.
McNair, H.
Taylor, H.
Hansen, V.
Sharabiani, M.
Thomas, K.
Jones, K.
Dearnaley, D.
Hafeez, S.
Huddart, R.A.
The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study
title The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study
title_full The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study
title_fullStr The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study
title_short The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study
title_sort intensity-modulated pelvic node and bladder radiotherapy (impart) trial: a phase ii single-centre prospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31400946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT tanmp theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT harrisv theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT warrenosenik theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT mcdonaldf theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT mcnairh theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT taylorh theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT hansenv theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT sharabianim theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT thomask theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT jonesk theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT dearnaleyd theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT hafeezs theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT huddartra theintensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT tanmp intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT harrisv intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT warrenosenik intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT mcdonaldf intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT mcnairh intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT taylorh intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT hansenv intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT sharabianim intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT thomask intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT jonesk intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT dearnaleyd intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT hafeezs intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy
AT huddartra intensitymodulatedpelvicnodeandbladderradiotherapyimparttrialaphaseiisinglecentreprospectivestudy