Cargando…

Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research

Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G., Anastasiou, Aikaterini I., Zachariou, Venetia, Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097
_version_ 1783488728236294144
author Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G.
Anastasiou, Aikaterini I.
Zachariou, Venetia
Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta
author_facet Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G.
Anastasiou, Aikaterini I.
Zachariou, Venetia
Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta
author_sort Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G.
collection PubMed
description Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanations for failures of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for AD may include late initiation of treatments during the course of AD development, inappropriate drug dosages, erroneous selection of treatment targets, and mainly an inadequate understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AD, which may necessitate combination treatments rather than monotherapy. Clinical trials’ methodological issues have also been criticized. Drug-development research for AD is aimed to overcome these drawbacks. Preclinical and prodromal AD populations, as well as traditionally investigated populations representing all the clinical stages of AD, are included in recent trials. Systematic use of biomarkers in staging preclinical and prodromal AD and of a single primary outcome in trials of prodromal AD are regularly integrated. The application of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarkers, including new biomarkers—such as Tau positron emission tomography, neurofilament light chain (blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker of axonal degeneration) and neurogranin (CSF biomarker of synaptic functioning)—to clinical trials allows more precise staging of AD. Additionally, use of Bayesian statistics, modifiable clinical trial designs, and clinical trial simulators enrich the trial methodology. Besides, combination therapy regimens are assessed in clinical trials. The above-mentioned diagnostic and statistical advances, which have been recently integrated in clinical trials, are relevant to the recent failures of studies of disease-modifying treatments. Their experiential rather than theoretical origins may better equip potentially successful drug-development strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69664252020-01-27 Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G. Anastasiou, Aikaterini I. Zachariou, Venetia Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta Biomedicines Review Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanations for failures of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for AD may include late initiation of treatments during the course of AD development, inappropriate drug dosages, erroneous selection of treatment targets, and mainly an inadequate understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AD, which may necessitate combination treatments rather than monotherapy. Clinical trials’ methodological issues have also been criticized. Drug-development research for AD is aimed to overcome these drawbacks. Preclinical and prodromal AD populations, as well as traditionally investigated populations representing all the clinical stages of AD, are included in recent trials. Systematic use of biomarkers in staging preclinical and prodromal AD and of a single primary outcome in trials of prodromal AD are regularly integrated. The application of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarkers, including new biomarkers—such as Tau positron emission tomography, neurofilament light chain (blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker of axonal degeneration) and neurogranin (CSF biomarker of synaptic functioning)—to clinical trials allows more precise staging of AD. Additionally, use of Bayesian statistics, modifiable clinical trial designs, and clinical trial simulators enrich the trial methodology. Besides, combination therapy regimens are assessed in clinical trials. The above-mentioned diagnostic and statistical advances, which have been recently integrated in clinical trials, are relevant to the recent failures of studies of disease-modifying treatments. Their experiential rather than theoretical origins may better equip potentially successful drug-development strategies. MDPI 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6966425/ /pubmed/31835422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G.
Anastasiou, Aikaterini I.
Zachariou, Venetia
Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta
Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
title Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
title_full Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
title_fullStr Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
title_full_unstemmed Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
title_short Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
title_sort reasons for failed trials of disease-modifying treatments for alzheimer disease and their contribution in recent research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097
work_keys_str_mv AT yiannopouloukonstantinag reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch
AT anastasiouaikaterinii reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch
AT zachariouvenetia reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch
AT pelidousygklitihenrietta reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch