Cargando…
Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research
Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097 |
_version_ | 1783488728236294144 |
---|---|
author | Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G. Anastasiou, Aikaterini I. Zachariou, Venetia Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta |
author_facet | Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G. Anastasiou, Aikaterini I. Zachariou, Venetia Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta |
author_sort | Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanations for failures of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for AD may include late initiation of treatments during the course of AD development, inappropriate drug dosages, erroneous selection of treatment targets, and mainly an inadequate understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AD, which may necessitate combination treatments rather than monotherapy. Clinical trials’ methodological issues have also been criticized. Drug-development research for AD is aimed to overcome these drawbacks. Preclinical and prodromal AD populations, as well as traditionally investigated populations representing all the clinical stages of AD, are included in recent trials. Systematic use of biomarkers in staging preclinical and prodromal AD and of a single primary outcome in trials of prodromal AD are regularly integrated. The application of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarkers, including new biomarkers—such as Tau positron emission tomography, neurofilament light chain (blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker of axonal degeneration) and neurogranin (CSF biomarker of synaptic functioning)—to clinical trials allows more precise staging of AD. Additionally, use of Bayesian statistics, modifiable clinical trial designs, and clinical trial simulators enrich the trial methodology. Besides, combination therapy regimens are assessed in clinical trials. The above-mentioned diagnostic and statistical advances, which have been recently integrated in clinical trials, are relevant to the recent failures of studies of disease-modifying treatments. Their experiential rather than theoretical origins may better equip potentially successful drug-development strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69664252020-01-27 Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G. Anastasiou, Aikaterini I. Zachariou, Venetia Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta Biomedicines Review Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanations for failures of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for AD may include late initiation of treatments during the course of AD development, inappropriate drug dosages, erroneous selection of treatment targets, and mainly an inadequate understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AD, which may necessitate combination treatments rather than monotherapy. Clinical trials’ methodological issues have also been criticized. Drug-development research for AD is aimed to overcome these drawbacks. Preclinical and prodromal AD populations, as well as traditionally investigated populations representing all the clinical stages of AD, are included in recent trials. Systematic use of biomarkers in staging preclinical and prodromal AD and of a single primary outcome in trials of prodromal AD are regularly integrated. The application of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarkers, including new biomarkers—such as Tau positron emission tomography, neurofilament light chain (blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker of axonal degeneration) and neurogranin (CSF biomarker of synaptic functioning)—to clinical trials allows more precise staging of AD. Additionally, use of Bayesian statistics, modifiable clinical trial designs, and clinical trial simulators enrich the trial methodology. Besides, combination therapy regimens are assessed in clinical trials. The above-mentioned diagnostic and statistical advances, which have been recently integrated in clinical trials, are relevant to the recent failures of studies of disease-modifying treatments. Their experiential rather than theoretical origins may better equip potentially successful drug-development strategies. MDPI 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6966425/ /pubmed/31835422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G. Anastasiou, Aikaterini I. Zachariou, Venetia Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research |
title | Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research |
title_full | Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research |
title_fullStr | Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research |
title_short | Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research |
title_sort | reasons for failed trials of disease-modifying treatments for alzheimer disease and their contribution in recent research |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yiannopouloukonstantinag reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch AT anastasiouaikaterinii reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch AT zachariouvenetia reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch AT pelidousygklitihenrietta reasonsforfailedtrialsofdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsforalzheimerdiseaseandtheircontributioninrecentresearch |