Cargando…
Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages contain...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040075 |
_version_ | 1783488729166381056 |
---|---|
author | D’Souza, Marissa Macdonald, Nicholas A. Gendreau, Julian L. Duddleston, Pate J. Feng, Austin Y. Ho, Allen L. |
author_facet | D’Souza, Marissa Macdonald, Nicholas A. Gendreau, Julian L. Duddleston, Pate J. Feng, Austin Y. Ho, Allen L. |
author_sort | D’Souza, Marissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages containing autografts, allografts, demineralized bone matrices (DBMs), or graft substitutes such as ceramic scaffolds. Autografts from the iliac spine are the most commonly used as they offer osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive capabilities, all while avoiding immune system rejection. Allografts obtained from cadavers and living donors can also be advantageous as they lack the need for graft extraction from the patient. DBMs are acid-extracted organic allografts with osteoinductive properties. Ceramic grafts containing hydroxyapatite can be readily manufactured and are able to provide osteoinductive support while having a long shelf life. Further, bone-morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic peptides, and autologous growth factors are currently being optimized to assist in improving vertebral fusion. Genetic therapies utilizing viral transduction are also currently being devised. This review provides an overview of the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of currently available graft materials. The current literature on growth factors, stem cells, and genetic therapy is also discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69664292020-01-27 Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion D’Souza, Marissa Macdonald, Nicholas A. Gendreau, Julian L. Duddleston, Pate J. Feng, Austin Y. Ho, Allen L. Biomedicines Review Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages containing autografts, allografts, demineralized bone matrices (DBMs), or graft substitutes such as ceramic scaffolds. Autografts from the iliac spine are the most commonly used as they offer osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive capabilities, all while avoiding immune system rejection. Allografts obtained from cadavers and living donors can also be advantageous as they lack the need for graft extraction from the patient. DBMs are acid-extracted organic allografts with osteoinductive properties. Ceramic grafts containing hydroxyapatite can be readily manufactured and are able to provide osteoinductive support while having a long shelf life. Further, bone-morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic peptides, and autologous growth factors are currently being optimized to assist in improving vertebral fusion. Genetic therapies utilizing viral transduction are also currently being devised. This review provides an overview of the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of currently available graft materials. The current literature on growth factors, stem cells, and genetic therapy is also discussed. MDPI 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6966429/ /pubmed/31561556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040075 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review D’Souza, Marissa Macdonald, Nicholas A. Gendreau, Julian L. Duddleston, Pate J. Feng, Austin Y. Ho, Allen L. Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion |
title | Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion |
title_full | Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr | Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion |
title_short | Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion |
title_sort | graft materials and biologics for spinal interbody fusion |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dsouzamarissa graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion AT macdonaldnicholasa graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion AT gendreaujulianl graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion AT duddlestonpatej graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion AT fengaustiny graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion AT hoallenl graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion |