Cargando…

Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion

Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages contain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Souza, Marissa, Macdonald, Nicholas A., Gendreau, Julian L., Duddleston, Pate J., Feng, Austin Y., Ho, Allen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561556
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040075
_version_ 1783488729166381056
author D’Souza, Marissa
Macdonald, Nicholas A.
Gendreau, Julian L.
Duddleston, Pate J.
Feng, Austin Y.
Ho, Allen L.
author_facet D’Souza, Marissa
Macdonald, Nicholas A.
Gendreau, Julian L.
Duddleston, Pate J.
Feng, Austin Y.
Ho, Allen L.
author_sort D’Souza, Marissa
collection PubMed
description Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages containing autografts, allografts, demineralized bone matrices (DBMs), or graft substitutes such as ceramic scaffolds. Autografts from the iliac spine are the most commonly used as they offer osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive capabilities, all while avoiding immune system rejection. Allografts obtained from cadavers and living donors can also be advantageous as they lack the need for graft extraction from the patient. DBMs are acid-extracted organic allografts with osteoinductive properties. Ceramic grafts containing hydroxyapatite can be readily manufactured and are able to provide osteoinductive support while having a long shelf life. Further, bone-morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic peptides, and autologous growth factors are currently being optimized to assist in improving vertebral fusion. Genetic therapies utilizing viral transduction are also currently being devised. This review provides an overview of the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of currently available graft materials. The current literature on growth factors, stem cells, and genetic therapy is also discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69664292020-01-27 Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion D’Souza, Marissa Macdonald, Nicholas A. Gendreau, Julian L. Duddleston, Pate J. Feng, Austin Y. Ho, Allen L. Biomedicines Review Spinal fusion is the most widely performed procedure in spine surgery. It is the preferred treatment for a wide variety of pathologies including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and deformity. Surgeons have the choice of fusing vertebrae by utilizing cages containing autografts, allografts, demineralized bone matrices (DBMs), or graft substitutes such as ceramic scaffolds. Autografts from the iliac spine are the most commonly used as they offer osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive capabilities, all while avoiding immune system rejection. Allografts obtained from cadavers and living donors can also be advantageous as they lack the need for graft extraction from the patient. DBMs are acid-extracted organic allografts with osteoinductive properties. Ceramic grafts containing hydroxyapatite can be readily manufactured and are able to provide osteoinductive support while having a long shelf life. Further, bone-morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic peptides, and autologous growth factors are currently being optimized to assist in improving vertebral fusion. Genetic therapies utilizing viral transduction are also currently being devised. This review provides an overview of the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of currently available graft materials. The current literature on growth factors, stem cells, and genetic therapy is also discussed. MDPI 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6966429/ /pubmed/31561556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040075 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
D’Souza, Marissa
Macdonald, Nicholas A.
Gendreau, Julian L.
Duddleston, Pate J.
Feng, Austin Y.
Ho, Allen L.
Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
title Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
title_full Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
title_short Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion
title_sort graft materials and biologics for spinal interbody fusion
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561556
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040075
work_keys_str_mv AT dsouzamarissa graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion
AT macdonaldnicholasa graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion
AT gendreaujulianl graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion
AT duddlestonpatej graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion
AT fengaustiny graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion
AT hoallenl graftmaterialsandbiologicsforspinalinterbodyfusion