Cargando…

Automated Gleason Scoring and Tumor Quantification in Prostate Core Needle Biopsy Images Using Deep Neural Networks and Its Comparison with Pathologist-Based Assessment

The Gleason grading system, currently the most powerful prognostic predictor of prostate cancer, is based solely on the tumor’s histological architecture and has high inter-observer variability. We propose an automated Gleason scoring system based on deep neural networks for diagnosis of prostate co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ryu, Han Suk, Jin, Min-Sun, Park, Jeong Hwan, Lee, Sanghun, Cho, Joonyoung, Oh, Sangjun, Kwak, Tae-Yeong, Woo, Junwoo Isaac, Mun, Yechan, Kim, Sun Woo, Hwang, Soohyun, Shin, Su-Jin, Chang, Hyeyoon
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	MDPI 2019
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769420 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121860

Ejemplares similares

Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
por: Mun, Yechan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists
por: Al-Maghrabi, Jaudah Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Artificial Intelligence in Pathology
por: Chang, Hye Yoon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists
por: Nakai, Yasushi, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Real-time diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate core needle biopsies using nonlinear microscopy
por: Cahill, Lucas C., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Inadequate fine needle aspiration biopsy samples: Pathologists versus other specialists
por: Gomez-Macías, GS, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Comparison of specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration biopsies performed by surgeons and pathologists
por: Al-Marzooq, Yusef M., et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Prostate cancer: Relationship between vascular diameter, shape and density and Gleason score in needle biopsy specimens
por: Tadayyon, Farhad, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy Enables Gleason Scoring of Prostate Core Needle Biopsy by a Convolutional Neural Network
por: Ao, Jianpeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6
por: Oh, Jong Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Gleason’s Grading of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Inter-Observer Variation Among Seven Pathologists at a Tertiary Care Center in Oman
por: Qureshi, Asim, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Management and outcomes of Gleason six prostate cancer detected on needle biopsy: A single-surgeon experience over 6 years
por: March, Brayden, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

RCKD: Response-Based Cross-Task Knowledge Distillation for Pathological Image Analysis
por: Kim, Hyunil, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Atypical diagnosis in prostate needle biopsies from a developing country (Philippines): The essential role of a urological pathologist
por: Yañez, Cecille Marie Julienne B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How to prepare, handle, read, and improve EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: The pathologist's role
por: Biermann, Katharina, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Significance of Nuclear Factor - Kappa Beta Activation on Prostate Needle Biopsy Samples in the Evaluation of Gleason Score 6 Prostatic Carcinoma Indolence
por: Zupancic, Marko, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Can Contemporary Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 3+4 Be Eligible for Active Surveillance?
por: Kwon, Ohseong, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

pT3 Predictive Factors in Patients with a Gleason Score of 6 in Prostate Biopsies
por: Kim, Sung Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
por: Kamecki, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
por: Moon, Seung Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Agreement on endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided tissue specimens: Comparing a 20‐G fine‐needle biopsy to a 25‐G fine‐needle aspiration needle among academic and non‐academic pathologists
por: van Riet, Priscilla A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Park, Juhyun, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Role of AMACR, CD10, TMPRSS2-ERG, and p27 Protein Expression Among Different Gleason Grades of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy
por: Gülhan, Özdemir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Core-Needle Biopsy Does Not Show Superior Diagnostic Performance to Fine-Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules
por: Shin, Ilah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Author Reply: Factors to Consider When Interpreting the Diagnostic Performance of Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core-Needle Biopsy in Specific Patient Population
por: Shin, Ilah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
por: Fiorentino, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6–7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8–10
por: Chung, Doo Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The 2019 core-needle biopsy practice guidelines
por: Jeong, So Yeong, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Biological safety of Electroacupuncture with STS316 needles
por: Choi, Kwang-Ho, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Extrathoracic Malignancy
por: Park, Jinkyeong, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Needle biopsy
por: Deeley, Thomas J.
Publicado: (1974)

The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6
por: Wang, Hanfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Lectures on Gleason parts
por: Bear, Herbert S
Publicado: (1970)

Dr. S. O. Gleason
Publicado: (1899)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_k28vc11480sjv026ermgktti73