Cargando…

Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

Clinicians are increasingly facing the decision of performing anal cancer screening in high-risk groups. Anal cytology is commonly the first approach. We systematically reviewed recommendations favoring anal cytology for anal cancer screening. Three databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Embas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albuquerque, Andreia, Rios, Elisabete, Schmitt, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121942
_version_ 1783488775901413376
author Albuquerque, Andreia
Rios, Elisabete
Schmitt, Fernando
author_facet Albuquerque, Andreia
Rios, Elisabete
Schmitt, Fernando
author_sort Albuquerque, Andreia
collection PubMed
description Clinicians are increasingly facing the decision of performing anal cancer screening in high-risk groups. Anal cytology is commonly the first approach. We systematically reviewed recommendations favoring anal cytology for anal cancer screening. Three databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, from January 2007 to 12 September 2019. The references cited by the retrieved articles and the websites of relevant organizations were also searched without language restrictions. Studies reporting guidelines from regional or national societies, institutes, or groups were included. Eight papers met the inclusion criteria and were selected, five were from the United States of America (USA) and three from Europe. There were no national recommendations published. There was one guideline specifically for solid-organ transplant recipients. The other seven targeted HIV-positive patients, with HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) included as a screening group in all of these. Two recommendations favored screening in all HIV-positive patients. Five recommendations targeting HIV-positive patients made considerations about the cytology follow-up, recommending at least annual cytology in case of a normal result, and in case of squamous cytological abnormalities, a referral for anoscopy/high-resolution anoscopy. There were no recommendations for upper and lower age limits for screening. In conclusion, several societies recommend anal cancer screening using anal cytology in HIV-positive MSM patients. There is a lack of screening recommendations for other high-risk groups, with only one society recommending screening in transplant recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69666112020-02-04 Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review Albuquerque, Andreia Rios, Elisabete Schmitt, Fernando Cancers (Basel) Review Clinicians are increasingly facing the decision of performing anal cancer screening in high-risk groups. Anal cytology is commonly the first approach. We systematically reviewed recommendations favoring anal cytology for anal cancer screening. Three databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, from January 2007 to 12 September 2019. The references cited by the retrieved articles and the websites of relevant organizations were also searched without language restrictions. Studies reporting guidelines from regional or national societies, institutes, or groups were included. Eight papers met the inclusion criteria and were selected, five were from the United States of America (USA) and three from Europe. There were no national recommendations published. There was one guideline specifically for solid-organ transplant recipients. The other seven targeted HIV-positive patients, with HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) included as a screening group in all of these. Two recommendations favored screening in all HIV-positive patients. Five recommendations targeting HIV-positive patients made considerations about the cytology follow-up, recommending at least annual cytology in case of a normal result, and in case of squamous cytological abnormalities, a referral for anoscopy/high-resolution anoscopy. There were no recommendations for upper and lower age limits for screening. In conclusion, several societies recommend anal cancer screening using anal cytology in HIV-positive MSM patients. There is a lack of screening recommendations for other high-risk groups, with only one society recommending screening in transplant recipients. MDPI 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6966611/ /pubmed/31817212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121942 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Albuquerque, Andreia
Rios, Elisabete
Schmitt, Fernando
Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_full Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_short Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_sort recommendations favoring anal cytology as a method for anal cancer screening: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121942
work_keys_str_mv AT albuquerqueandreia recommendationsfavoringanalcytologyasamethodforanalcancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT rioselisabete recommendationsfavoringanalcytologyasamethodforanalcancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT schmittfernando recommendationsfavoringanalcytologyasamethodforanalcancerscreeningasystematicreview