Cargando…
Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
Clinicians are increasingly facing the decision of performing anal cancer screening in high-risk groups. Anal cytology is commonly the first approach. We systematically reviewed recommendations favoring anal cytology for anal cancer screening. Three databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Embas...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121942 |
_version_ | 1783488775901413376 |
---|---|
author | Albuquerque, Andreia Rios, Elisabete Schmitt, Fernando |
author_facet | Albuquerque, Andreia Rios, Elisabete Schmitt, Fernando |
author_sort | Albuquerque, Andreia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinicians are increasingly facing the decision of performing anal cancer screening in high-risk groups. Anal cytology is commonly the first approach. We systematically reviewed recommendations favoring anal cytology for anal cancer screening. Three databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, from January 2007 to 12 September 2019. The references cited by the retrieved articles and the websites of relevant organizations were also searched without language restrictions. Studies reporting guidelines from regional or national societies, institutes, or groups were included. Eight papers met the inclusion criteria and were selected, five were from the United States of America (USA) and three from Europe. There were no national recommendations published. There was one guideline specifically for solid-organ transplant recipients. The other seven targeted HIV-positive patients, with HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) included as a screening group in all of these. Two recommendations favored screening in all HIV-positive patients. Five recommendations targeting HIV-positive patients made considerations about the cytology follow-up, recommending at least annual cytology in case of a normal result, and in case of squamous cytological abnormalities, a referral for anoscopy/high-resolution anoscopy. There were no recommendations for upper and lower age limits for screening. In conclusion, several societies recommend anal cancer screening using anal cytology in HIV-positive MSM patients. There is a lack of screening recommendations for other high-risk groups, with only one society recommending screening in transplant recipients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69666112020-02-04 Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review Albuquerque, Andreia Rios, Elisabete Schmitt, Fernando Cancers (Basel) Review Clinicians are increasingly facing the decision of performing anal cancer screening in high-risk groups. Anal cytology is commonly the first approach. We systematically reviewed recommendations favoring anal cytology for anal cancer screening. Three databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, from January 2007 to 12 September 2019. The references cited by the retrieved articles and the websites of relevant organizations were also searched without language restrictions. Studies reporting guidelines from regional or national societies, institutes, or groups were included. Eight papers met the inclusion criteria and were selected, five were from the United States of America (USA) and three from Europe. There were no national recommendations published. There was one guideline specifically for solid-organ transplant recipients. The other seven targeted HIV-positive patients, with HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) included as a screening group in all of these. Two recommendations favored screening in all HIV-positive patients. Five recommendations targeting HIV-positive patients made considerations about the cytology follow-up, recommending at least annual cytology in case of a normal result, and in case of squamous cytological abnormalities, a referral for anoscopy/high-resolution anoscopy. There were no recommendations for upper and lower age limits for screening. In conclusion, several societies recommend anal cancer screening using anal cytology in HIV-positive MSM patients. There is a lack of screening recommendations for other high-risk groups, with only one society recommending screening in transplant recipients. MDPI 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6966611/ /pubmed/31817212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121942 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Albuquerque, Andreia Rios, Elisabete Schmitt, Fernando Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review |
title | Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | recommendations favoring anal cytology as a method for anal cancer screening: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albuquerqueandreia recommendationsfavoringanalcytologyasamethodforanalcancerscreeningasystematicreview AT rioselisabete recommendationsfavoringanalcytologyasamethodforanalcancerscreeningasystematicreview AT schmittfernando recommendationsfavoringanalcytologyasamethodforanalcancerscreeningasystematicreview |