Cargando…

Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort

The occurrence of optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) still raises many questions regarding screening and surveillance because of the lack of robust prognostic factors. Recent studies of an overall cohort of 381 patients have suggested that the genotype may b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melloni, Giulia, Eoli, Marica, Cesaretti, Claudia, Bianchessi, Donatella, Ibba, Maria Cristina, Esposito, Silvia, Scuvera, Giulietta, Morcaldi, Guido, Micheli, Roberto, Piozzi, Elena, Avignone, Sabrina, Chiapparini, Luisa, Pantaleoni, Chiara, Natacci, Federica, Finocchiaro, Gaetano, Saletti, Veronica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121838
_version_ 1783488789380857856
author Melloni, Giulia
Eoli, Marica
Cesaretti, Claudia
Bianchessi, Donatella
Ibba, Maria Cristina
Esposito, Silvia
Scuvera, Giulietta
Morcaldi, Guido
Micheli, Roberto
Piozzi, Elena
Avignone, Sabrina
Chiapparini, Luisa
Pantaleoni, Chiara
Natacci, Federica
Finocchiaro, Gaetano
Saletti, Veronica
author_facet Melloni, Giulia
Eoli, Marica
Cesaretti, Claudia
Bianchessi, Donatella
Ibba, Maria Cristina
Esposito, Silvia
Scuvera, Giulietta
Morcaldi, Guido
Micheli, Roberto
Piozzi, Elena
Avignone, Sabrina
Chiapparini, Luisa
Pantaleoni, Chiara
Natacci, Federica
Finocchiaro, Gaetano
Saletti, Veronica
author_sort Melloni, Giulia
collection PubMed
description The occurrence of optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) still raises many questions regarding screening and surveillance because of the lack of robust prognostic factors. Recent studies of an overall cohort of 381 patients have suggested that the genotype may be the main determinant of the development of OPG, with the risk being higher in patients harbouring NF1 mutations in the 5’ tertile and the cysteine/serine-rich domain. In an attempt to confirm this hypothesis, we used strict criteria to select a large independent cohort of 309 NF1 patients with defined constitutional NF1 mutations and appropriate brain images (255 directly enrolled and 54 as a result of a literature search). One hundred and thirty-two patients had OPG and 177 did not. The association of the position (tertiles and functional domains) and type of NF1 mutation with the development of OPG was analysed using the χ2 test and Fisher’s exact probability test; odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons was applied; multiple logistic regression was also used to study genotype–phenotype associations further. Our findings show no significant correlation between the site/type of NF1 mutation and the risk of OPG, and thus do not support the hypothesis that certain constitutional mutations provide prognostic information in this regard. In addition, we combined our cohort with a previously described cohort of 381 patients for a total of 690 patients and statistically re-analysed the results. The re-analysis confirmed that there were no correlations between the site (tertile and domain) and the risk of OPG, thus further strengthening our conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69666662020-02-04 Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort Melloni, Giulia Eoli, Marica Cesaretti, Claudia Bianchessi, Donatella Ibba, Maria Cristina Esposito, Silvia Scuvera, Giulietta Morcaldi, Guido Micheli, Roberto Piozzi, Elena Avignone, Sabrina Chiapparini, Luisa Pantaleoni, Chiara Natacci, Federica Finocchiaro, Gaetano Saletti, Veronica Cancers (Basel) Article The occurrence of optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) still raises many questions regarding screening and surveillance because of the lack of robust prognostic factors. Recent studies of an overall cohort of 381 patients have suggested that the genotype may be the main determinant of the development of OPG, with the risk being higher in patients harbouring NF1 mutations in the 5’ tertile and the cysteine/serine-rich domain. In an attempt to confirm this hypothesis, we used strict criteria to select a large independent cohort of 309 NF1 patients with defined constitutional NF1 mutations and appropriate brain images (255 directly enrolled and 54 as a result of a literature search). One hundred and thirty-two patients had OPG and 177 did not. The association of the position (tertiles and functional domains) and type of NF1 mutation with the development of OPG was analysed using the χ2 test and Fisher’s exact probability test; odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons was applied; multiple logistic regression was also used to study genotype–phenotype associations further. Our findings show no significant correlation between the site/type of NF1 mutation and the risk of OPG, and thus do not support the hypothesis that certain constitutional mutations provide prognostic information in this regard. In addition, we combined our cohort with a previously described cohort of 381 patients for a total of 690 patients and statistically re-analysed the results. The re-analysis confirmed that there were no correlations between the site (tertile and domain) and the risk of OPG, thus further strengthening our conclusions. MDPI 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6966666/ /pubmed/31766501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121838 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Melloni, Giulia
Eoli, Marica
Cesaretti, Claudia
Bianchessi, Donatella
Ibba, Maria Cristina
Esposito, Silvia
Scuvera, Giulietta
Morcaldi, Guido
Micheli, Roberto
Piozzi, Elena
Avignone, Sabrina
Chiapparini, Luisa
Pantaleoni, Chiara
Natacci, Federica
Finocchiaro, Gaetano
Saletti, Veronica
Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort
title Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort
title_full Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort
title_fullStr Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort
title_short Risk of Optic Pathway Glioma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: No Evidence of Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in a Large Independent Cohort
title_sort risk of optic pathway glioma in neurofibromatosis type 1: no evidence of genotype–phenotype correlations in a large independent cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121838
work_keys_str_mv AT mellonigiulia riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT eolimarica riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT cesaretticlaudia riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT bianchessidonatella riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT ibbamariacristina riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT espositosilvia riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT scuveragiulietta riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT morcaldiguido riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT micheliroberto riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT piozzielena riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT avignonesabrina riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT chiappariniluisa riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT pantaleonichiara riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT nataccifederica riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT finocchiarogaetano riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort
AT salettiveronica riskofopticpathwaygliomainneurofibromatosistype1noevidenceofgenotypephenotypecorrelationsinalargeindependentcohort