Cargando…

Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma

In the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup of medulloblastoma (MB), tumor initiation and progression are in part driven by smoothened (SMO) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor (FGFR) signaling, respectively. We investigated the impact of the SMO-FGFR crosstalk on tumor growth and invasiveness in M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neve, Anuja, Migliavacca, Jessica, Capdeville, Charles, Schönholzer, Marc Thomas, Gries, Alexandre, Ma, Min, Santhana Kumar, Karthiga, Grotzer, Michael, Baumgartner, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121985
_version_ 1783488792827527168
author Neve, Anuja
Migliavacca, Jessica
Capdeville, Charles
Schönholzer, Marc Thomas
Gries, Alexandre
Ma, Min
Santhana Kumar, Karthiga
Grotzer, Michael
Baumgartner, Martin
author_facet Neve, Anuja
Migliavacca, Jessica
Capdeville, Charles
Schönholzer, Marc Thomas
Gries, Alexandre
Ma, Min
Santhana Kumar, Karthiga
Grotzer, Michael
Baumgartner, Martin
author_sort Neve, Anuja
collection PubMed
description In the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup of medulloblastoma (MB), tumor initiation and progression are in part driven by smoothened (SMO) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor (FGFR) signaling, respectively. We investigated the impact of the SMO-FGFR crosstalk on tumor growth and invasiveness in MB. We found that FGFR signaling represses GLI1 expression downstream of activated SMO in the SHH MB line DAOY and induces MKI67, HES1, and BMI1 in DAOY and in the group 3 MB line HD-MBO3. FGFR repression of GLI1 does not affect proliferation or viability, whereas inhibition of FGFR is necessary to release SMO-driven invasiveness. Conversely, SMO activation represses FGFR-driven sustained activation of nuclear ERK. Parallel activation of FGFR and SMO in ex vivo tumor cell-cerebellum slice co-cultures reduced invasion of tumor cells without affecting proliferation. In contrast, treatment of the cells with the SMO antagonist Sonidegib (LDE225) blocked invasion and proliferation in cerebellar slices. Thus, sustained, low-level SMO activation is necessary for proliferation and tissue invasion, whereas acute, pronounced activation of SMO can repress FGFR-driven invasiveness. This suggests that the tumor cell response is dependent on the relative local abundance of the two factors and indicates a paradigm of microenvironmental control of invasion in SHH MB through mutual control of SHH and FGFR signaling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69666812020-02-04 Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma Neve, Anuja Migliavacca, Jessica Capdeville, Charles Schönholzer, Marc Thomas Gries, Alexandre Ma, Min Santhana Kumar, Karthiga Grotzer, Michael Baumgartner, Martin Cancers (Basel) Article In the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup of medulloblastoma (MB), tumor initiation and progression are in part driven by smoothened (SMO) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor (FGFR) signaling, respectively. We investigated the impact of the SMO-FGFR crosstalk on tumor growth and invasiveness in MB. We found that FGFR signaling represses GLI1 expression downstream of activated SMO in the SHH MB line DAOY and induces MKI67, HES1, and BMI1 in DAOY and in the group 3 MB line HD-MBO3. FGFR repression of GLI1 does not affect proliferation or viability, whereas inhibition of FGFR is necessary to release SMO-driven invasiveness. Conversely, SMO activation represses FGFR-driven sustained activation of nuclear ERK. Parallel activation of FGFR and SMO in ex vivo tumor cell-cerebellum slice co-cultures reduced invasion of tumor cells without affecting proliferation. In contrast, treatment of the cells with the SMO antagonist Sonidegib (LDE225) blocked invasion and proliferation in cerebellar slices. Thus, sustained, low-level SMO activation is necessary for proliferation and tissue invasion, whereas acute, pronounced activation of SMO can repress FGFR-driven invasiveness. This suggests that the tumor cell response is dependent on the relative local abundance of the two factors and indicates a paradigm of microenvironmental control of invasion in SHH MB through mutual control of SHH and FGFR signaling. MDPI 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6966681/ /pubmed/31835472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121985 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Neve, Anuja
Migliavacca, Jessica
Capdeville, Charles
Schönholzer, Marc Thomas
Gries, Alexandre
Ma, Min
Santhana Kumar, Karthiga
Grotzer, Michael
Baumgartner, Martin
Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
title Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
title_full Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
title_fullStr Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
title_short Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
title_sort crosstalk between shh and fgfr signaling pathways controls tissue invasion in medulloblastoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121985
work_keys_str_mv AT neveanuja crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT migliavaccajessica crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT capdevillecharles crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT schonholzermarcthomas crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT griesalexandre crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT mamin crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT santhanakumarkarthiga crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT grotzermichael crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma
AT baumgartnermartin crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma