Cargando…
Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma
In the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup of medulloblastoma (MB), tumor initiation and progression are in part driven by smoothened (SMO) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor (FGFR) signaling, respectively. We investigated the impact of the SMO-FGFR crosstalk on tumor growth and invasiveness in M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121985 |
_version_ | 1783488792827527168 |
---|---|
author | Neve, Anuja Migliavacca, Jessica Capdeville, Charles Schönholzer, Marc Thomas Gries, Alexandre Ma, Min Santhana Kumar, Karthiga Grotzer, Michael Baumgartner, Martin |
author_facet | Neve, Anuja Migliavacca, Jessica Capdeville, Charles Schönholzer, Marc Thomas Gries, Alexandre Ma, Min Santhana Kumar, Karthiga Grotzer, Michael Baumgartner, Martin |
author_sort | Neve, Anuja |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup of medulloblastoma (MB), tumor initiation and progression are in part driven by smoothened (SMO) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor (FGFR) signaling, respectively. We investigated the impact of the SMO-FGFR crosstalk on tumor growth and invasiveness in MB. We found that FGFR signaling represses GLI1 expression downstream of activated SMO in the SHH MB line DAOY and induces MKI67, HES1, and BMI1 in DAOY and in the group 3 MB line HD-MBO3. FGFR repression of GLI1 does not affect proliferation or viability, whereas inhibition of FGFR is necessary to release SMO-driven invasiveness. Conversely, SMO activation represses FGFR-driven sustained activation of nuclear ERK. Parallel activation of FGFR and SMO in ex vivo tumor cell-cerebellum slice co-cultures reduced invasion of tumor cells without affecting proliferation. In contrast, treatment of the cells with the SMO antagonist Sonidegib (LDE225) blocked invasion and proliferation in cerebellar slices. Thus, sustained, low-level SMO activation is necessary for proliferation and tissue invasion, whereas acute, pronounced activation of SMO can repress FGFR-driven invasiveness. This suggests that the tumor cell response is dependent on the relative local abundance of the two factors and indicates a paradigm of microenvironmental control of invasion in SHH MB through mutual control of SHH and FGFR signaling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69666812020-02-04 Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma Neve, Anuja Migliavacca, Jessica Capdeville, Charles Schönholzer, Marc Thomas Gries, Alexandre Ma, Min Santhana Kumar, Karthiga Grotzer, Michael Baumgartner, Martin Cancers (Basel) Article In the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup of medulloblastoma (MB), tumor initiation and progression are in part driven by smoothened (SMO) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor (FGFR) signaling, respectively. We investigated the impact of the SMO-FGFR crosstalk on tumor growth and invasiveness in MB. We found that FGFR signaling represses GLI1 expression downstream of activated SMO in the SHH MB line DAOY and induces MKI67, HES1, and BMI1 in DAOY and in the group 3 MB line HD-MBO3. FGFR repression of GLI1 does not affect proliferation or viability, whereas inhibition of FGFR is necessary to release SMO-driven invasiveness. Conversely, SMO activation represses FGFR-driven sustained activation of nuclear ERK. Parallel activation of FGFR and SMO in ex vivo tumor cell-cerebellum slice co-cultures reduced invasion of tumor cells without affecting proliferation. In contrast, treatment of the cells with the SMO antagonist Sonidegib (LDE225) blocked invasion and proliferation in cerebellar slices. Thus, sustained, low-level SMO activation is necessary for proliferation and tissue invasion, whereas acute, pronounced activation of SMO can repress FGFR-driven invasiveness. This suggests that the tumor cell response is dependent on the relative local abundance of the two factors and indicates a paradigm of microenvironmental control of invasion in SHH MB through mutual control of SHH and FGFR signaling. MDPI 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6966681/ /pubmed/31835472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121985 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Neve, Anuja Migliavacca, Jessica Capdeville, Charles Schönholzer, Marc Thomas Gries, Alexandre Ma, Min Santhana Kumar, Karthiga Grotzer, Michael Baumgartner, Martin Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma |
title | Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma |
title_full | Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma |
title_fullStr | Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma |
title_short | Crosstalk between SHH and FGFR Signaling Pathways Controls Tissue Invasion in Medulloblastoma |
title_sort | crosstalk between shh and fgfr signaling pathways controls tissue invasion in medulloblastoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neveanuja crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT migliavaccajessica crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT capdevillecharles crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT schonholzermarcthomas crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT griesalexandre crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT mamin crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT santhanakumarkarthiga crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT grotzermichael crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma AT baumgartnermartin crosstalkbetweenshhandfgfrsignalingpathwayscontrolstissueinvasioninmedulloblastoma |