Cargando…

Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, there has been significant growth in the awareness and understanding of fragility among orthopaedic surgeons in the context of osteoporotic fractures and with it, improvements in the recognition and management of fragility fractures. Emerging as a major clinical and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archibald, Mandy M., Lawless, Michael, Gill, Tiffany K., Chehade, Mellick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1404-8
_version_ 1783488824136957952
author Archibald, Mandy M.
Lawless, Michael
Gill, Tiffany K.
Chehade, Mellick J.
author_facet Archibald, Mandy M.
Lawless, Michael
Gill, Tiffany K.
Chehade, Mellick J.
author_sort Archibald, Mandy M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, there has been significant growth in the awareness and understanding of fragility among orthopaedic surgeons in the context of osteoporotic fractures and with it, improvements in the recognition and management of fragility fractures. Emerging as a major clinical and research focus in aged care is the concept of frailty and its associations with fragility, sarcopenia, falls and rehabilitation. Currently, research is lacking on how orthopaedic surgeons perceive frailty and the role of frailty screening. A baseline understanding of these perceptions is needed to inform integration of frailty identification and management for patient optimization in orthopaedic practices, as well as research and education efforts of patients and healthcare professionals in orthopaedic contexts. METHODS: We used an exploratory design guided by qualitative description to conduct 15 semi-structured telephone and in-person interviews across three orthopaedic surgeon subgroups (Registrars, Junior Consultants, and Senior Consultants). Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively and was guided by thematic saturation. RESULTS: Orthopaedic surgeons have a disparate understanding of frailty. Between colleagues, frailty is often referred to non-specifically to suggest a general state of risk to the patient. Frailty screening is regarded positively but its specific utility in orthopaedic environments is questioned. Easy-to-administer frailty screening tools that are not exclusive assessments of functional status are viewed most satisfactorily. However these tools are rarely used. CONCLUSIONS: There is little understanding among orthopaedic surgeons of frailty as a phenotype. Beliefs around modifiability of frailty were dissimilar as were the impact of related risk factors, such a cognitive status, chronic disease, social isolation, and environmental influences. This in turn may significantly impact on the occurrence and treatment outcomes of fragility fracture, a common orthopaedic problem in older populations. This study highlights need for knowledge translation efforts (e.g. education) to achieve cohesive understanding of frailty among health professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69668242020-01-22 Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening Archibald, Mandy M. Lawless, Michael Gill, Tiffany K. Chehade, Mellick J. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, there has been significant growth in the awareness and understanding of fragility among orthopaedic surgeons in the context of osteoporotic fractures and with it, improvements in the recognition and management of fragility fractures. Emerging as a major clinical and research focus in aged care is the concept of frailty and its associations with fragility, sarcopenia, falls and rehabilitation. Currently, research is lacking on how orthopaedic surgeons perceive frailty and the role of frailty screening. A baseline understanding of these perceptions is needed to inform integration of frailty identification and management for patient optimization in orthopaedic practices, as well as research and education efforts of patients and healthcare professionals in orthopaedic contexts. METHODS: We used an exploratory design guided by qualitative description to conduct 15 semi-structured telephone and in-person interviews across three orthopaedic surgeon subgroups (Registrars, Junior Consultants, and Senior Consultants). Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively and was guided by thematic saturation. RESULTS: Orthopaedic surgeons have a disparate understanding of frailty. Between colleagues, frailty is often referred to non-specifically to suggest a general state of risk to the patient. Frailty screening is regarded positively but its specific utility in orthopaedic environments is questioned. Easy-to-administer frailty screening tools that are not exclusive assessments of functional status are viewed most satisfactorily. However these tools are rarely used. CONCLUSIONS: There is little understanding among orthopaedic surgeons of frailty as a phenotype. Beliefs around modifiability of frailty were dissimilar as were the impact of related risk factors, such a cognitive status, chronic disease, social isolation, and environmental influences. This in turn may significantly impact on the occurrence and treatment outcomes of fragility fracture, a common orthopaedic problem in older populations. This study highlights need for knowledge translation efforts (e.g. education) to achieve cohesive understanding of frailty among health professionals. BioMed Central 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6966824/ /pubmed/31948387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1404-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Archibald, Mandy M.
Lawless, Michael
Gill, Tiffany K.
Chehade, Mellick J.
Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
title Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
title_full Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
title_fullStr Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
title_full_unstemmed Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
title_short Orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
title_sort orthopaedic surgeons’ perceptions of frailty and frailty screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1404-8
work_keys_str_mv AT archibaldmandym orthopaedicsurgeonsperceptionsoffrailtyandfrailtyscreening
AT lawlessmichael orthopaedicsurgeonsperceptionsoffrailtyandfrailtyscreening
AT gilltiffanyk orthopaedicsurgeonsperceptionsoffrailtyandfrailtyscreening
AT chehademellickj orthopaedicsurgeonsperceptionsoffrailtyandfrailtyscreening