Cargando…
Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Patients’ involvement in patient safety has increased in healthcare. Use of checklists may improve patient outcome in surgery, though few have attempted to engage patients’ use of surgical checklist. To identify risk elements of complications based on patients’ and healthcare workers’ ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1 |
_version_ | 1783488832877887488 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Kristin Søfteland, Eirik Moi, Asgjerd Litleré Harthug, Stig Storesund, Anette Jesuthasan, Sebastius Sevdalis, Nick Haugen, Arvid Steinar |
author_facet | Harris, Kristin Søfteland, Eirik Moi, Asgjerd Litleré Harthug, Stig Storesund, Anette Jesuthasan, Sebastius Sevdalis, Nick Haugen, Arvid Steinar |
author_sort | Harris, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients’ involvement in patient safety has increased in healthcare. Use of checklists may improve patient outcome in surgery, though few have attempted to engage patients’ use of surgical checklist. To identify risk elements of complications based on patients’ and healthcare workers’ experiences is warranted. This study aims to identify what the patients and healthcare workers find to be the risk elements that should be included in a patient-driven surgical patient safety checklist. METHOD: A qualitative study design where post-operative patients, surgeons, ward physicians, ward nurses, and secretaries from five surgical specialties took part in focus group interviews. Eleven focus groups were conducted including 25 post-operative patients and 27 healthcare workers at one tertiary teaching hospital and one community hospital in Norway. Based on their experiences, participants were asked to identify perceived risks before and after surgery. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Safety risk factors were categorised as pre-operative information: pre-operative preparations, post-operative information, post-operative plans and follow-up. The subcategories under pre-operative information and preparations were: contact information, medication safety, health status, optimising health, dental status, read information, preparation two weeks before surgery, inform your surgical ward, planning your own discharge, preparation on admission and just before surgery. The subcategories under post-operative information, further plans and follow-up were: prevention and complications, restriction and activity, medication safety, pain relief, stomach functions, further care and appointments. Both healthcare workers and patients express the need for a surgical patient safety checklist. CONCLUSION: A broad spectre of risk elements for a patient safety checklist were identified. Developing a surgical safety checklist based on these risk elements might reduce complications and unwanted errors. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study is registered as part of a clinical trial in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03105713. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69668612020-01-27 Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study Harris, Kristin Søfteland, Eirik Moi, Asgjerd Litleré Harthug, Stig Storesund, Anette Jesuthasan, Sebastius Sevdalis, Nick Haugen, Arvid Steinar BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients’ involvement in patient safety has increased in healthcare. Use of checklists may improve patient outcome in surgery, though few have attempted to engage patients’ use of surgical checklist. To identify risk elements of complications based on patients’ and healthcare workers’ experiences is warranted. This study aims to identify what the patients and healthcare workers find to be the risk elements that should be included in a patient-driven surgical patient safety checklist. METHOD: A qualitative study design where post-operative patients, surgeons, ward physicians, ward nurses, and secretaries from five surgical specialties took part in focus group interviews. Eleven focus groups were conducted including 25 post-operative patients and 27 healthcare workers at one tertiary teaching hospital and one community hospital in Norway. Based on their experiences, participants were asked to identify perceived risks before and after surgery. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Safety risk factors were categorised as pre-operative information: pre-operative preparations, post-operative information, post-operative plans and follow-up. The subcategories under pre-operative information and preparations were: contact information, medication safety, health status, optimising health, dental status, read information, preparation two weeks before surgery, inform your surgical ward, planning your own discharge, preparation on admission and just before surgery. The subcategories under post-operative information, further plans and follow-up were: prevention and complications, restriction and activity, medication safety, pain relief, stomach functions, further care and appointments. Both healthcare workers and patients express the need for a surgical patient safety checklist. CONCLUSION: A broad spectre of risk elements for a patient safety checklist were identified. Developing a surgical safety checklist based on these risk elements might reduce complications and unwanted errors. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study is registered as part of a clinical trial in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03105713. BioMed Central 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6966861/ /pubmed/31948462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harris, Kristin Søfteland, Eirik Moi, Asgjerd Litleré Harthug, Stig Storesund, Anette Jesuthasan, Sebastius Sevdalis, Nick Haugen, Arvid Steinar Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
title | Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
title_full | Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
title_short | Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
title_sort | patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harriskristin patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT søftelandeirik patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT moiasgjerdlitlere patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT harthugstig patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT storesundanette patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT jesuthasansebastius patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT sevdalisnick patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy AT haugenarvidsteinar patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy |