Cargando…

Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Patients’ involvement in patient safety has increased in healthcare. Use of checklists may improve patient outcome in surgery, though few have attempted to engage patients’ use of surgical checklist. To identify risk elements of complications based on patients’ and healthcare workers’ ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Kristin, Søfteland, Eirik, Moi, Asgjerd Litleré, Harthug, Stig, Storesund, Anette, Jesuthasan, Sebastius, Sevdalis, Nick, Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1
_version_ 1783488832877887488
author Harris, Kristin
Søfteland, Eirik
Moi, Asgjerd Litleré
Harthug, Stig
Storesund, Anette
Jesuthasan, Sebastius
Sevdalis, Nick
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
author_facet Harris, Kristin
Søfteland, Eirik
Moi, Asgjerd Litleré
Harthug, Stig
Storesund, Anette
Jesuthasan, Sebastius
Sevdalis, Nick
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
author_sort Harris, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients’ involvement in patient safety has increased in healthcare. Use of checklists may improve patient outcome in surgery, though few have attempted to engage patients’ use of surgical checklist. To identify risk elements of complications based on patients’ and healthcare workers’ experiences is warranted. This study aims to identify what the patients and healthcare workers find to be the risk elements that should be included in a patient-driven surgical patient safety checklist. METHOD: A qualitative study design where post-operative patients, surgeons, ward physicians, ward nurses, and secretaries from five surgical specialties took part in focus group interviews. Eleven focus groups were conducted including 25 post-operative patients and 27 healthcare workers at one tertiary teaching hospital and one community hospital in Norway. Based on their experiences, participants were asked to identify perceived risks before and after surgery. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Safety risk factors were categorised as pre-operative information: pre-operative preparations, post-operative information, post-operative plans and follow-up. The subcategories under pre-operative information and preparations were: contact information, medication safety, health status, optimising health, dental status, read information, preparation two weeks before surgery, inform your surgical ward, planning your own discharge, preparation on admission and just before surgery. The subcategories under post-operative information, further plans and follow-up were: prevention and complications, restriction and activity, medication safety, pain relief, stomach functions, further care and appointments. Both healthcare workers and patients express the need for a surgical patient safety checklist. CONCLUSION: A broad spectre of risk elements for a patient safety checklist were identified. Developing a surgical safety checklist based on these risk elements might reduce complications and unwanted errors. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study is registered as part of a clinical trial in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03105713.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69668612020-01-27 Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study Harris, Kristin Søfteland, Eirik Moi, Asgjerd Litleré Harthug, Stig Storesund, Anette Jesuthasan, Sebastius Sevdalis, Nick Haugen, Arvid Steinar BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients’ involvement in patient safety has increased in healthcare. Use of checklists may improve patient outcome in surgery, though few have attempted to engage patients’ use of surgical checklist. To identify risk elements of complications based on patients’ and healthcare workers’ experiences is warranted. This study aims to identify what the patients and healthcare workers find to be the risk elements that should be included in a patient-driven surgical patient safety checklist. METHOD: A qualitative study design where post-operative patients, surgeons, ward physicians, ward nurses, and secretaries from five surgical specialties took part in focus group interviews. Eleven focus groups were conducted including 25 post-operative patients and 27 healthcare workers at one tertiary teaching hospital and one community hospital in Norway. Based on their experiences, participants were asked to identify perceived risks before and after surgery. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Safety risk factors were categorised as pre-operative information: pre-operative preparations, post-operative information, post-operative plans and follow-up. The subcategories under pre-operative information and preparations were: contact information, medication safety, health status, optimising health, dental status, read information, preparation two weeks before surgery, inform your surgical ward, planning your own discharge, preparation on admission and just before surgery. The subcategories under post-operative information, further plans and follow-up were: prevention and complications, restriction and activity, medication safety, pain relief, stomach functions, further care and appointments. Both healthcare workers and patients express the need for a surgical patient safety checklist. CONCLUSION: A broad spectre of risk elements for a patient safety checklist were identified. Developing a surgical safety checklist based on these risk elements might reduce complications and unwanted errors. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study is registered as part of a clinical trial in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03105713. BioMed Central 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6966861/ /pubmed/31948462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harris, Kristin
Søfteland, Eirik
Moi, Asgjerd Litleré
Harthug, Stig
Storesund, Anette
Jesuthasan, Sebastius
Sevdalis, Nick
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
title Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
title_full Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
title_short Patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
title_sort patients’ and healthcare workers’ recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4888-1
work_keys_str_mv AT harriskristin patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT søftelandeirik patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT moiasgjerdlitlere patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT harthugstig patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT storesundanette patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT jesuthasansebastius patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT sevdalisnick patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy
AT haugenarvidsteinar patientsandhealthcareworkersrecommendationsforasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistaqualitativestudy