Cargando…
The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
BACKGROUND: Only a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0562-z |
_version_ | 1783488834079555584 |
---|---|
author | Štšepetova, Jelena Baranova, Juliana Simm, Jaak Parm, Ülle Rööp, Tiiu Sokmann, Sandra Korrovits, Paul Jaagura, Madis Rosenstein, Karin Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet |
author_facet | Štšepetova, Jelena Baranova, Juliana Simm, Jaak Parm, Ülle Rööp, Tiiu Sokmann, Sandra Korrovits, Paul Jaagura, Madis Rosenstein, Karin Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet |
author_sort | Štšepetova, Jelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Only a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples, and to associate them with clinical outcome. METHODS: The studied samples from 50 infertile couples included: raw (n = 48), processed (n = 49) and incubated (n = 50) sperm samples, and IVF culture media (n = 50). The full microbiome was analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing and quantitative analysis by real-time quantitative PCR. Descriptive statistics, t-, Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman’s correlation were used for comparison of studied groups. RESULTS: The study involved normozoospermic men. Normal vaginal microbiota was present in 72.0% of female partners, while intermediate microbiota and bacterial vaginosis were diagnosed in 12.0 and 16.0%, respectively. The decreasing bacterial loads were found in raw (35.5%), processed (12.0%) and sperm samples used for oocyte insemination (4.0%), and in 8.0% of IVF culture media. The most abundant genera of bacteria in native semen and IVF culture media were Lactobacillus, while in other samples Alphaproteobacteria prevailed. Staphylococcus sp. was found only in semen from patients with inflammation. Phylum Bacteroidetes was in negative correlation with sperm motility and Alphaproteobacteria with high-quality IVF embryos. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that IVF does not occur in a sterile environment. The prevalent bacteria include classes Bacilli in raw semen and IVF culture media, Clostridia in processed and Bacteroidia in sperm samples used for insemination. The presence of Staphylococcus sp. and Alphaproteobacteria associated with clinical outcomes, like sperm and embryo quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69668662020-01-27 The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure Štšepetova, Jelena Baranova, Juliana Simm, Jaak Parm, Ülle Rööp, Tiiu Sokmann, Sandra Korrovits, Paul Jaagura, Madis Rosenstein, Karin Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Only a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples, and to associate them with clinical outcome. METHODS: The studied samples from 50 infertile couples included: raw (n = 48), processed (n = 49) and incubated (n = 50) sperm samples, and IVF culture media (n = 50). The full microbiome was analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing and quantitative analysis by real-time quantitative PCR. Descriptive statistics, t-, Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman’s correlation were used for comparison of studied groups. RESULTS: The study involved normozoospermic men. Normal vaginal microbiota was present in 72.0% of female partners, while intermediate microbiota and bacterial vaginosis were diagnosed in 12.0 and 16.0%, respectively. The decreasing bacterial loads were found in raw (35.5%), processed (12.0%) and sperm samples used for oocyte insemination (4.0%), and in 8.0% of IVF culture media. The most abundant genera of bacteria in native semen and IVF culture media were Lactobacillus, while in other samples Alphaproteobacteria prevailed. Staphylococcus sp. was found only in semen from patients with inflammation. Phylum Bacteroidetes was in negative correlation with sperm motility and Alphaproteobacteria with high-quality IVF embryos. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that IVF does not occur in a sterile environment. The prevalent bacteria include classes Bacilli in raw semen and IVF culture media, Clostridia in processed and Bacteroidia in sperm samples used for insemination. The presence of Staphylococcus sp. and Alphaproteobacteria associated with clinical outcomes, like sperm and embryo quality. BioMed Central 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6966866/ /pubmed/31948459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0562-z Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Štšepetova, Jelena Baranova, Juliana Simm, Jaak Parm, Ülle Rööp, Tiiu Sokmann, Sandra Korrovits, Paul Jaagura, Madis Rosenstein, Karin Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
title | The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
title_full | The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
title_fullStr | The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
title_short | The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
title_sort | complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0562-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stsepetovajelena thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT baranovajuliana thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT simmjaak thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT parmulle thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT rooptiiu thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT sokmannsandra thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT korrovitspaul thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT jaaguramadis thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT rosensteinkarin thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT salumetsandres thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT mandarreet thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT stsepetovajelena complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT baranovajuliana complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT simmjaak complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT parmulle complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT rooptiiu complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT sokmannsandra complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT korrovitspaul complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT jaaguramadis complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT rosensteinkarin complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT salumetsandres complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure AT mandarreet complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure |