Cargando…

The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure

BACKGROUND: Only a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Štšepetova, Jelena, Baranova, Juliana, Simm, Jaak, Parm, Ülle, Rööp, Tiiu, Sokmann, Sandra, Korrovits, Paul, Jaagura, Madis, Rosenstein, Karin, Salumets, Andres, Mändar, Reet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0562-z
_version_ 1783488834079555584
author Štšepetova, Jelena
Baranova, Juliana
Simm, Jaak
Parm, Ülle
Rööp, Tiiu
Sokmann, Sandra
Korrovits, Paul
Jaagura, Madis
Rosenstein, Karin
Salumets, Andres
Mändar, Reet
author_facet Štšepetova, Jelena
Baranova, Juliana
Simm, Jaak
Parm, Ülle
Rööp, Tiiu
Sokmann, Sandra
Korrovits, Paul
Jaagura, Madis
Rosenstein, Karin
Salumets, Andres
Mändar, Reet
author_sort Štšepetova, Jelena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Only a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples, and to associate them with clinical outcome. METHODS: The studied samples from 50 infertile couples included: raw (n = 48), processed (n = 49) and incubated (n = 50) sperm samples, and IVF culture media (n = 50). The full microbiome was analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing and quantitative analysis by real-time quantitative PCR. Descriptive statistics, t-, Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman’s correlation were used for comparison of studied groups. RESULTS: The study involved normozoospermic men. Normal vaginal microbiota was present in 72.0% of female partners, while intermediate microbiota and bacterial vaginosis were diagnosed in 12.0 and 16.0%, respectively. The decreasing bacterial loads were found in raw (35.5%), processed (12.0%) and sperm samples used for oocyte insemination (4.0%), and in 8.0% of IVF culture media. The most abundant genera of bacteria in native semen and IVF culture media were Lactobacillus, while in other samples Alphaproteobacteria prevailed. Staphylococcus sp. was found only in semen from patients with inflammation. Phylum Bacteroidetes was in negative correlation with sperm motility and Alphaproteobacteria with high-quality IVF embryos. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that IVF does not occur in a sterile environment. The prevalent bacteria include classes Bacilli in raw semen and IVF culture media, Clostridia in processed and Bacteroidia in sperm samples used for insemination. The presence of Staphylococcus sp. and Alphaproteobacteria associated with clinical outcomes, like sperm and embryo quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6966866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69668662020-01-27 The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure Štšepetova, Jelena Baranova, Juliana Simm, Jaak Parm, Ülle Rööp, Tiiu Sokmann, Sandra Korrovits, Paul Jaagura, Madis Rosenstein, Karin Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Only a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples, and to associate them with clinical outcome. METHODS: The studied samples from 50 infertile couples included: raw (n = 48), processed (n = 49) and incubated (n = 50) sperm samples, and IVF culture media (n = 50). The full microbiome was analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing and quantitative analysis by real-time quantitative PCR. Descriptive statistics, t-, Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman’s correlation were used for comparison of studied groups. RESULTS: The study involved normozoospermic men. Normal vaginal microbiota was present in 72.0% of female partners, while intermediate microbiota and bacterial vaginosis were diagnosed in 12.0 and 16.0%, respectively. The decreasing bacterial loads were found in raw (35.5%), processed (12.0%) and sperm samples used for oocyte insemination (4.0%), and in 8.0% of IVF culture media. The most abundant genera of bacteria in native semen and IVF culture media were Lactobacillus, while in other samples Alphaproteobacteria prevailed. Staphylococcus sp. was found only in semen from patients with inflammation. Phylum Bacteroidetes was in negative correlation with sperm motility and Alphaproteobacteria with high-quality IVF embryos. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that IVF does not occur in a sterile environment. The prevalent bacteria include classes Bacilli in raw semen and IVF culture media, Clostridia in processed and Bacteroidia in sperm samples used for insemination. The presence of Staphylococcus sp. and Alphaproteobacteria associated with clinical outcomes, like sperm and embryo quality. BioMed Central 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6966866/ /pubmed/31948459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0562-z Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Štšepetova, Jelena
Baranova, Juliana
Simm, Jaak
Parm, Ülle
Rööp, Tiiu
Sokmann, Sandra
Korrovits, Paul
Jaagura, Madis
Rosenstein, Karin
Salumets, Andres
Mändar, Reet
The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
title The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
title_full The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
title_fullStr The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
title_full_unstemmed The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
title_short The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
title_sort complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0562-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stsepetovajelena thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT baranovajuliana thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT simmjaak thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT parmulle thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT rooptiiu thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT sokmannsandra thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT korrovitspaul thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT jaaguramadis thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT rosensteinkarin thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT salumetsandres thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT mandarreet thecomplexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT stsepetovajelena complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT baranovajuliana complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT simmjaak complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT parmulle complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT rooptiiu complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT sokmannsandra complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT korrovitspaul complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT jaaguramadis complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT rosensteinkarin complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT salumetsandres complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure
AT mandarreet complexmicrobiomefromnativesementoembryocultureenvironmentinhumaninvitrofertilizationprocedure