Cargando…

The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are a key input to health and social welfare decisions. Studies included in systematic reviews often vary with respect to contextual factors that may impact on how transferable review findings are to the review context. However, many review authors do not consider the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munthe-Kaas, Heather, Nøkleby, Heid, Lewin, Simon, Glenton, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6967089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0834-5
_version_ 1783488878344142848
author Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Nøkleby, Heid
Lewin, Simon
Glenton, Claire
author_facet Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Nøkleby, Heid
Lewin, Simon
Glenton, Claire
author_sort Munthe-Kaas, Heather
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are a key input to health and social welfare decisions. Studies included in systematic reviews often vary with respect to contextual factors that may impact on how transferable review findings are to the review context. However, many review authors do not consider the transferability of review findings until the end of the review process, for example when assessing confidence in the evidence using GRADE or GRADE-CERQual. This paper describes the TRANSFER Approach, a novel approach for supporting collaboration between review authors and stakeholders from the beginning of the review process to systematically and transparently consider factors that may influence the transferability of systematic review findings. METHODS: We developed the TRANSFER Approach in three stages: (1) discussions with stakeholders to identify current practices and needs regarding the use of methods to consider transferability, (2) systematic search for and mapping of 25 existing checklists related to transferability, and (3) using the results of stage two to develop a structured conversation format which was applied in three systematic review processes. RESULTS: None of the identified existing checklists related to transferability provided detailed guidance for review authors on how to assess transferability in systematic reviews, in collaboration with decision makers. The content analysis uncovered seven categories of factors to consider when discussing transferability. We used these to develop a structured conversation guide for discussing potential transferability factors with stakeholders at the beginning of the review process. In response to feedback and trial and error, the TRANSFER Approach has developed, expanding beyond the initial conversation guide, and is now made up of seven stages which are described in this article. CONCLUSIONS: The TRANSFER Approach supports review authors in collaborating with decision makers to ensure an informed consideration, from the beginning of the review process, of the transferability of the review findings to the review context. Further testing of TRANSFER is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6967089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69670892020-01-27 The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings Munthe-Kaas, Heather Nøkleby, Heid Lewin, Simon Glenton, Claire BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are a key input to health and social welfare decisions. Studies included in systematic reviews often vary with respect to contextual factors that may impact on how transferable review findings are to the review context. However, many review authors do not consider the transferability of review findings until the end of the review process, for example when assessing confidence in the evidence using GRADE or GRADE-CERQual. This paper describes the TRANSFER Approach, a novel approach for supporting collaboration between review authors and stakeholders from the beginning of the review process to systematically and transparently consider factors that may influence the transferability of systematic review findings. METHODS: We developed the TRANSFER Approach in three stages: (1) discussions with stakeholders to identify current practices and needs regarding the use of methods to consider transferability, (2) systematic search for and mapping of 25 existing checklists related to transferability, and (3) using the results of stage two to develop a structured conversation format which was applied in three systematic review processes. RESULTS: None of the identified existing checklists related to transferability provided detailed guidance for review authors on how to assess transferability in systematic reviews, in collaboration with decision makers. The content analysis uncovered seven categories of factors to consider when discussing transferability. We used these to develop a structured conversation guide for discussing potential transferability factors with stakeholders at the beginning of the review process. In response to feedback and trial and error, the TRANSFER Approach has developed, expanding beyond the initial conversation guide, and is now made up of seven stages which are described in this article. CONCLUSIONS: The TRANSFER Approach supports review authors in collaborating with decision makers to ensure an informed consideration, from the beginning of the review process, of the transferability of the review findings to the review context. Further testing of TRANSFER is needed. BioMed Central 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6967089/ /pubmed/31952495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0834-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Nøkleby, Heid
Lewin, Simon
Glenton, Claire
The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
title The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
title_full The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
title_fullStr The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
title_full_unstemmed The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
title_short The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
title_sort transfer approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6967089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0834-5
work_keys_str_mv AT munthekaasheather thetransferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT nøklebyheid thetransferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT lewinsimon thetransferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT glentonclaire thetransferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT munthekaasheather transferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT nøklebyheid transferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT lewinsimon transferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings
AT glentonclaire transferapproachforassessingthetransferabilityofsystematicreviewfindings