Cargando…
The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
Background: The empirical literature of network analysis studies of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has grown rapidly over the last years. Objective: We aimed to assess the characteristics of these studies, and if possible, the most and least central symptoms and the strongest edges in the netw...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1700614 |
_version_ | 1783489174982098944 |
---|---|
author | Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott Greene, Talya Spiller, Tobias Raphael |
author_facet | Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott Greene, Talya Spiller, Tobias Raphael |
author_sort | Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The empirical literature of network analysis studies of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has grown rapidly over the last years. Objective: We aimed to assess the characteristics of these studies, and if possible, the most and least central symptoms and the strongest edges in the networks of PTSS. Method: The present systematic review, conducted in PsycInfo, Medline, and Web of Science, synthesizes findings from 20 cross-sectional PTSS network studies that were accepted for publication between January 2010 and November 2018 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018112825). Results: Results indicated that the network studies investigated a broad range of samples and that most studies used similar analytic approaches including stability analysis. Only strength centrality was generally adequately stable. Amnesia was consistently reported to have lowest strength, while there was substantial heterogeneity regarding which nodes had highest strength centrality. The strongest edge weights were typically within each DSM-IV/DSM-5 PTSD symptom cluster. Conclusions: Hypothesis-driven studies are needed to determine whether the heterogeneity in networks resulted from differences in samples or whether they are the product of underlying methodological reasons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6968637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69686372020-01-30 The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott Greene, Talya Spiller, Tobias Raphael Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: The empirical literature of network analysis studies of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has grown rapidly over the last years. Objective: We aimed to assess the characteristics of these studies, and if possible, the most and least central symptoms and the strongest edges in the networks of PTSS. Method: The present systematic review, conducted in PsycInfo, Medline, and Web of Science, synthesizes findings from 20 cross-sectional PTSS network studies that were accepted for publication between January 2010 and November 2018 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018112825). Results: Results indicated that the network studies investigated a broad range of samples and that most studies used similar analytic approaches including stability analysis. Only strength centrality was generally adequately stable. Amnesia was consistently reported to have lowest strength, while there was substantial heterogeneity regarding which nodes had highest strength centrality. The strongest edge weights were typically within each DSM-IV/DSM-5 PTSD symptom cluster. Conclusions: Hypothesis-driven studies are needed to determine whether the heterogeneity in networks resulted from differences in samples or whether they are the product of underlying methodological reasons. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6968637/ /pubmed/32002135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1700614 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott Greene, Talya Spiller, Tobias Raphael The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
title | The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
title_full | The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
title_short | The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
title_sort | network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1700614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birkelandmarianneskogbrott thenetworkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview AT greenetalya thenetworkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview AT spillertobiasraphael thenetworkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview AT birkelandmarianneskogbrott networkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview AT greenetalya networkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview AT spillertobiasraphael networkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview |