Cargando…

The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review

Background: The empirical literature of network analysis studies of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has grown rapidly over the last years. Objective: We aimed to assess the characteristics of these studies, and if possible, the most and least central symptoms and the strongest edges in the netw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott, Greene, Talya, Spiller, Tobias Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1700614
_version_ 1783489174982098944
author Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott
Greene, Talya
Spiller, Tobias Raphael
author_facet Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott
Greene, Talya
Spiller, Tobias Raphael
author_sort Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott
collection PubMed
description Background: The empirical literature of network analysis studies of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has grown rapidly over the last years. Objective: We aimed to assess the characteristics of these studies, and if possible, the most and least central symptoms and the strongest edges in the networks of PTSS. Method: The present systematic review, conducted in PsycInfo, Medline, and Web of Science, synthesizes findings from 20 cross-sectional PTSS network studies that were accepted for publication between January 2010 and November 2018 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018112825). Results: Results indicated that the network studies investigated a broad range of samples and that most studies used similar analytic approaches including stability analysis. Only strength centrality was generally adequately stable. Amnesia was consistently reported to have lowest strength, while there was substantial heterogeneity regarding which nodes had highest strength centrality. The strongest edge weights were typically within each DSM-IV/DSM-5 PTSD symptom cluster. Conclusions: Hypothesis-driven studies are needed to determine whether the heterogeneity in networks resulted from differences in samples or whether they are the product of underlying methodological reasons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6968637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69686372020-01-30 The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott Greene, Talya Spiller, Tobias Raphael Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: The empirical literature of network analysis studies of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has grown rapidly over the last years. Objective: We aimed to assess the characteristics of these studies, and if possible, the most and least central symptoms and the strongest edges in the networks of PTSS. Method: The present systematic review, conducted in PsycInfo, Medline, and Web of Science, synthesizes findings from 20 cross-sectional PTSS network studies that were accepted for publication between January 2010 and November 2018 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018112825). Results: Results indicated that the network studies investigated a broad range of samples and that most studies used similar analytic approaches including stability analysis. Only strength centrality was generally adequately stable. Amnesia was consistently reported to have lowest strength, while there was substantial heterogeneity regarding which nodes had highest strength centrality. The strongest edge weights were typically within each DSM-IV/DSM-5 PTSD symptom cluster. Conclusions: Hypothesis-driven studies are needed to determine whether the heterogeneity in networks resulted from differences in samples or whether they are the product of underlying methodological reasons. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6968637/ /pubmed/32002135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1700614 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott
Greene, Talya
Spiller, Tobias Raphael
The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_full The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_fullStr The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_short The network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_sort network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1700614
work_keys_str_mv AT birkelandmarianneskogbrott thenetworkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT greenetalya thenetworkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT spillertobiasraphael thenetworkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT birkelandmarianneskogbrott networkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT greenetalya networkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT spillertobiasraphael networkapproachtoposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview