Cargando…

The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites

AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassila, Lippo, Säilynoja, Eija, Prinssi, Roosa, Vallittu, Pekka K., Garoushi, Sufyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201
_version_ 1783489190789382144
author Lassila, Lippo
Säilynoja, Eija
Prinssi, Roosa
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Garoushi, Sufyan
author_facet Lassila, Lippo
Säilynoja, Eija
Prinssi, Roosa
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Garoushi, Sufyan
author_sort Lassila, Lippo
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from conventional RCs (G-aenial Ant. and Flo X), bulk-fill RC (Filtek Bulk Fill), fluoride-releasing RCs (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative) and discontinuous microfiber-reinforced RCs (Alert and everX Flow). Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups (n = 3), according to polishing protocol: Laboratory-machine polishing with different siliconcarbide paper grits (G1: 320) → (G2: 800) → (G3: 1200) → (G4: 2000) → (G5: 4000). Chairside-hand polishing using a series of Sof-Lex spiral (G6) and abrasive polishing points (G7). Glossmeter was used to determine the SG at 60° incidence angle. SG was measured before and after polishing. Three-dimensional (3 D) noncontact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences in SG (ranged 3–93 GU) were found according to the type of polishing protocol and RC (p < .05). Specimens polished with 4000 grit paper showed the highest SG (93 GU) values among all the groups tested. CONCLUSIONS: The tested chairside-hand polishing protocols presented lower SG values than laboratory-machine polishing (4000 silicon paper grit) and unpolished surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6968704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69687042020-01-31 The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites Lassila, Lippo Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan Biomater Investig Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from conventional RCs (G-aenial Ant. and Flo X), bulk-fill RC (Filtek Bulk Fill), fluoride-releasing RCs (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative) and discontinuous microfiber-reinforced RCs (Alert and everX Flow). Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups (n = 3), according to polishing protocol: Laboratory-machine polishing with different siliconcarbide paper grits (G1: 320) → (G2: 800) → (G3: 1200) → (G4: 2000) → (G5: 4000). Chairside-hand polishing using a series of Sof-Lex spiral (G6) and abrasive polishing points (G7). Glossmeter was used to determine the SG at 60° incidence angle. SG was measured before and after polishing. Three-dimensional (3 D) noncontact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences in SG (ranged 3–93 GU) were found according to the type of polishing protocol and RC (p < .05). Specimens polished with 4000 grit paper showed the highest SG (93 GU) values among all the groups tested. CONCLUSIONS: The tested chairside-hand polishing protocols presented lower SG values than laboratory-machine polishing (4000 silicon paper grit) and unpolished surfaces. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6968704/ /pubmed/32010900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lassila, Lippo
Säilynoja, Eija
Prinssi, Roosa
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Garoushi, Sufyan
The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
title The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
title_full The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
title_fullStr The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
title_full_unstemmed The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
title_short The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
title_sort effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201
work_keys_str_mv AT lassilalippo theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT sailynojaeija theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT prinssiroosa theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT vallittupekkak theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT garoushisufyan theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT lassilalippo effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT sailynojaeija effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT prinssiroosa effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT vallittupekkak effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites
AT garoushisufyan effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites