Cargando…
The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites
AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201 |
_version_ | 1783489190789382144 |
---|---|
author | Lassila, Lippo Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan |
author_facet | Lassila, Lippo Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan |
author_sort | Lassila, Lippo |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from conventional RCs (G-aenial Ant. and Flo X), bulk-fill RC (Filtek Bulk Fill), fluoride-releasing RCs (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative) and discontinuous microfiber-reinforced RCs (Alert and everX Flow). Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups (n = 3), according to polishing protocol: Laboratory-machine polishing with different siliconcarbide paper grits (G1: 320) → (G2: 800) → (G3: 1200) → (G4: 2000) → (G5: 4000). Chairside-hand polishing using a series of Sof-Lex spiral (G6) and abrasive polishing points (G7). Glossmeter was used to determine the SG at 60° incidence angle. SG was measured before and after polishing. Three-dimensional (3 D) noncontact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences in SG (ranged 3–93 GU) were found according to the type of polishing protocol and RC (p < .05). Specimens polished with 4000 grit paper showed the highest SG (93 GU) values among all the groups tested. CONCLUSIONS: The tested chairside-hand polishing protocols presented lower SG values than laboratory-machine polishing (4000 silicon paper grit) and unpolished surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6968704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69687042020-01-31 The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites Lassila, Lippo Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan Biomater Investig Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from conventional RCs (G-aenial Ant. and Flo X), bulk-fill RC (Filtek Bulk Fill), fluoride-releasing RCs (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative) and discontinuous microfiber-reinforced RCs (Alert and everX Flow). Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups (n = 3), according to polishing protocol: Laboratory-machine polishing with different siliconcarbide paper grits (G1: 320) → (G2: 800) → (G3: 1200) → (G4: 2000) → (G5: 4000). Chairside-hand polishing using a series of Sof-Lex spiral (G6) and abrasive polishing points (G7). Glossmeter was used to determine the SG at 60° incidence angle. SG was measured before and after polishing. Three-dimensional (3 D) noncontact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences in SG (ranged 3–93 GU) were found according to the type of polishing protocol and RC (p < .05). Specimens polished with 4000 grit paper showed the highest SG (93 GU) values among all the groups tested. CONCLUSIONS: The tested chairside-hand polishing protocols presented lower SG values than laboratory-machine polishing (4000 silicon paper grit) and unpolished surfaces. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6968704/ /pubmed/32010900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lassila, Lippo Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
title | The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
title_full | The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
title_fullStr | The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
title_short | The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
title_sort | effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lassilalippo theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT sailynojaeija theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT prinssiroosa theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT vallittupekkak theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT garoushisufyan theeffectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT lassilalippo effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT sailynojaeija effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT prinssiroosa effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT vallittupekkak effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites AT garoushisufyan effectofpolishingprotocolonsurfaceglossofdifferentrestorativeresincomposites |