Cargando…

Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch

Touch, such as a caress, can be interpreted as very pleasant. The emotional valence assigned to touch is likely related to certain bottom-up factors, such as optimal activation of C-tactile (CT) afferents. It is however unclear if besides somatosensory input, contextual factors related to the own bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keizer, Anouk, de Jong, Jutta R., Bartlema, Lianne, Dijkerman, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28958660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.004
_version_ 1783489239702306816
author Keizer, Anouk
de Jong, Jutta R.
Bartlema, Lianne
Dijkerman, Chris
author_facet Keizer, Anouk
de Jong, Jutta R.
Bartlema, Lianne
Dijkerman, Chris
author_sort Keizer, Anouk
collection PubMed
description Touch, such as a caress, can be interpreted as very pleasant. The emotional valence assigned to touch is likely related to certain bottom-up factors, such as optimal activation of C-tactile (CT) afferents. It is however unclear if besides somatosensory input, contextual factors related to the own body also play a role in the perceived pleasantness of touch. To test this, we manipulated visual appearance of the participant’s arm (veridical vision, no vision, pixelated moving statistic projected onto the arm (i.e. crawling skin)). We used slow velocity stroking (CT optimal stroking) with a soft brush to induce pleasant touch, and fast velocity stroking as a control condition. After each visual condition we asked participants (N = 23) to rate the emotional valence of the stroking they felt. After slow velocity stroking ratings on perceived pleasantness (but not on perceived unpleasantness) were modulated by visual condition, with veridical vision of the arm resulting in higher pleasantness ratings than both no vision and pixelated vision. We conclude that contextual processes affect the perceived pleasantness of touch. These findings shed a new light on the underlying mechanisms of how humans experience pleasant touch and show that pleasant touch not solely dependents on bottom up information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6968957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69689572020-01-21 Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch Keizer, Anouk de Jong, Jutta R. Bartlema, Lianne Dijkerman, Chris Dev Cogn Neurosci Article Touch, such as a caress, can be interpreted as very pleasant. The emotional valence assigned to touch is likely related to certain bottom-up factors, such as optimal activation of C-tactile (CT) afferents. It is however unclear if besides somatosensory input, contextual factors related to the own body also play a role in the perceived pleasantness of touch. To test this, we manipulated visual appearance of the participant’s arm (veridical vision, no vision, pixelated moving statistic projected onto the arm (i.e. crawling skin)). We used slow velocity stroking (CT optimal stroking) with a soft brush to induce pleasant touch, and fast velocity stroking as a control condition. After each visual condition we asked participants (N = 23) to rate the emotional valence of the stroking they felt. After slow velocity stroking ratings on perceived pleasantness (but not on perceived unpleasantness) were modulated by visual condition, with veridical vision of the arm resulting in higher pleasantness ratings than both no vision and pixelated vision. We conclude that contextual processes affect the perceived pleasantness of touch. These findings shed a new light on the underlying mechanisms of how humans experience pleasant touch and show that pleasant touch not solely dependents on bottom up information. Elsevier 2017-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6968957/ /pubmed/28958660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.004 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Keizer, Anouk
de Jong, Jutta R.
Bartlema, Lianne
Dijkerman, Chris
Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
title Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
title_full Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
title_fullStr Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
title_full_unstemmed Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
title_short Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
title_sort visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28958660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.004
work_keys_str_mv AT keizeranouk visualperceptionofthearmmanipulatestheexperiencedpleasantnessoftouch
AT dejongjuttar visualperceptionofthearmmanipulatestheexperiencedpleasantnessoftouch
AT bartlemalianne visualperceptionofthearmmanipulatestheexperiencedpleasantnessoftouch
AT dijkermanchris visualperceptionofthearmmanipulatestheexperiencedpleasantnessoftouch