Cargando…
Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development
Although lower socioeconomic status (SES) is generally negatively associated with performance on cognitive assessments, some children from lower-SES backgrounds perform as well as their peers from higher-SES backgrounds. Yet little research has examined whether the neural correlates of individual di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30951970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100641 |
_version_ | 1783489294229307392 |
---|---|
author | Leonard, Julia A. Romeo, Rachel R. Park, Anne T. Takada, Megumi E. Robinson, Sydney T. Grotzinger, Hannah Last, Briana S. Finn, Amy S. Gabrieli, John D.E. Mackey, Allyson P. |
author_facet | Leonard, Julia A. Romeo, Rachel R. Park, Anne T. Takada, Megumi E. Robinson, Sydney T. Grotzinger, Hannah Last, Briana S. Finn, Amy S. Gabrieli, John D.E. Mackey, Allyson P. |
author_sort | Leonard, Julia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although lower socioeconomic status (SES) is generally negatively associated with performance on cognitive assessments, some children from lower-SES backgrounds perform as well as their peers from higher-SES backgrounds. Yet little research has examined whether the neural correlates of individual differences in cognition vary by SES. The current study explored whether relationships between cortical structure and fluid reasoning differ by SES in development. Fluid reasoning, a non-verbal component of IQ, is supported by a distributed frontoparietal network, with evidence for a specific role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC). In a sample of 115 4–7-year old children, bilateral thickness of RLPFC differentially related to reasoning by SES: thicker bilateral RLPFC positively correlated with reasoning ability in children from lower-SES backgrounds, but not in children from higher-SES backgrounds. Similar results were found in an independent sample of 59 12–16-year old adolescents. Furthermore, young children from lower-SES backgrounds with strong reasoning skills were the only group to show a positive relationship between RLPFC thickness and age. In sum, we found that relationships between cortical thickness and cognition differ by SES during development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6969225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69692252020-01-21 Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development Leonard, Julia A. Romeo, Rachel R. Park, Anne T. Takada, Megumi E. Robinson, Sydney T. Grotzinger, Hannah Last, Briana S. Finn, Amy S. Gabrieli, John D.E. Mackey, Allyson P. Dev Cogn Neurosci Recent Advances in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience – Special Issue from the Flux Congress 2016 & 2017 Although lower socioeconomic status (SES) is generally negatively associated with performance on cognitive assessments, some children from lower-SES backgrounds perform as well as their peers from higher-SES backgrounds. Yet little research has examined whether the neural correlates of individual differences in cognition vary by SES. The current study explored whether relationships between cortical structure and fluid reasoning differ by SES in development. Fluid reasoning, a non-verbal component of IQ, is supported by a distributed frontoparietal network, with evidence for a specific role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC). In a sample of 115 4–7-year old children, bilateral thickness of RLPFC differentially related to reasoning by SES: thicker bilateral RLPFC positively correlated with reasoning ability in children from lower-SES backgrounds, but not in children from higher-SES backgrounds. Similar results were found in an independent sample of 59 12–16-year old adolescents. Furthermore, young children from lower-SES backgrounds with strong reasoning skills were the only group to show a positive relationship between RLPFC thickness and age. In sum, we found that relationships between cortical thickness and cognition differ by SES during development. Elsevier 2019-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6969225/ /pubmed/30951970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100641 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Recent Advances in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience – Special Issue from the Flux Congress 2016 & 2017 Leonard, Julia A. Romeo, Rachel R. Park, Anne T. Takada, Megumi E. Robinson, Sydney T. Grotzinger, Hannah Last, Briana S. Finn, Amy S. Gabrieli, John D.E. Mackey, Allyson P. Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
title | Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
title_full | Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
title_fullStr | Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
title_full_unstemmed | Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
title_short | Associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
title_sort | associations between cortical thickness and reasoning differ by socioeconomic status in development |
topic | Recent Advances in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience – Special Issue from the Flux Congress 2016 & 2017 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30951970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leonardjuliaa associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT romeorachelr associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT parkannet associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT takadamegumie associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT robinsonsydneyt associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT grotzingerhannah associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT lastbrianas associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT finnamys associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT gabrielijohnde associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment AT mackeyallysonp associationsbetweencorticalthicknessandreasoningdifferbysocioeconomicstatusindevelopment |