Cargando…
Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are associated with a range of adverse patient outcomes, including coagulopathy, immunomodulation and haemolysis, which increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Consideration of these risks and potential benefits are necessary when deciding to transfuse. Patient b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0965-4 |
_version_ | 1783489338890256384 |
---|---|
author | Delaforce, Alana Duff, Jed Munday, Judy Hardy, Janet |
author_facet | Delaforce, Alana Duff, Jed Munday, Judy Hardy, Janet |
author_sort | Delaforce, Alana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are associated with a range of adverse patient outcomes, including coagulopathy, immunomodulation and haemolysis, which increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Consideration of these risks and potential benefits are necessary when deciding to transfuse. Patient blood management (PBM) guidelines exist to assist in clinical decision-making, but they are underutilised. Exploration of barriers to the implementation and utilisation of the PBM guidelines is required. This study aimed to identify common barriers and implementation strategies used to implement PBM guidelines, with a comparison against current expert opinion. METHODS: A restricted review approach was used to identify the barriers to PBM guideline implementation as reported by health professionals and to review which implementation strategies have been used. Searches were undertaken in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane library. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to code barriers. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool was used to code implementation strategies, and subsequently, develop recommendations based on expert opinion. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies suitable for inclusion. There was a cluster of barriers commonly reported: access to knowledge and information (n = 7), knowledge and beliefs about the intervention ( = 7) and tension for change (n = 6). Implementation strategies used varied widely (n = 25). Only one study reported the use of an implementation theory, model or framework. Most studies (n = 11) had at least 50% agreement with the ERIC recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There are common barriers experienced by health professionals when trying to implement PBM guidelines. There is currently no conclusive evidence to suggest which implementation strategies are most effective. Further research using validated implementation approaches and improved reporting is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6969479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69694792020-01-27 Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review Delaforce, Alana Duff, Jed Munday, Judy Hardy, Janet Implement Sci Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are associated with a range of adverse patient outcomes, including coagulopathy, immunomodulation and haemolysis, which increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Consideration of these risks and potential benefits are necessary when deciding to transfuse. Patient blood management (PBM) guidelines exist to assist in clinical decision-making, but they are underutilised. Exploration of barriers to the implementation and utilisation of the PBM guidelines is required. This study aimed to identify common barriers and implementation strategies used to implement PBM guidelines, with a comparison against current expert opinion. METHODS: A restricted review approach was used to identify the barriers to PBM guideline implementation as reported by health professionals and to review which implementation strategies have been used. Searches were undertaken in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane library. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to code barriers. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool was used to code implementation strategies, and subsequently, develop recommendations based on expert opinion. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies suitable for inclusion. There was a cluster of barriers commonly reported: access to knowledge and information (n = 7), knowledge and beliefs about the intervention ( = 7) and tension for change (n = 6). Implementation strategies used varied widely (n = 25). Only one study reported the use of an implementation theory, model or framework. Most studies (n = 11) had at least 50% agreement with the ERIC recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There are common barriers experienced by health professionals when trying to implement PBM guidelines. There is currently no conclusive evidence to suggest which implementation strategies are most effective. Further research using validated implementation approaches and improved reporting is required. BioMed Central 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6969479/ /pubmed/31952514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0965-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Delaforce, Alana Duff, Jed Munday, Judy Hardy, Janet Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
title | Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
title_full | Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
title_fullStr | Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
title_full_unstemmed | Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
title_short | Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
title_sort | overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0965-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delaforcealana overcomingbarrierstoevidencebasedpatientbloodmanagementarestrictedreview AT duffjed overcomingbarrierstoevidencebasedpatientbloodmanagementarestrictedreview AT mundayjudy overcomingbarrierstoevidencebasedpatientbloodmanagementarestrictedreview AT hardyjanet overcomingbarrierstoevidencebasedpatientbloodmanagementarestrictedreview |