Cargando…
Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model
Cancer is driven by the sequential accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The timing of these events is not well understood. Moreover, it is currently unknown why the same driver gene change appears as an early event in some cancer types and as a late...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914589117 |
_version_ | 1783489342383063040 |
---|---|
author | Lahouel, Kamel Younes, Laurent Danilova, Ludmila Giardiello, Francis M. Hruban, Ralph H. Groopman, John Kinzler, Kenneth W. Vogelstein, Bert Geman, Donald Tomasetti, Cristian |
author_facet | Lahouel, Kamel Younes, Laurent Danilova, Ludmila Giardiello, Francis M. Hruban, Ralph H. Groopman, John Kinzler, Kenneth W. Vogelstein, Bert Geman, Donald Tomasetti, Cristian |
author_sort | Lahouel, Kamel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cancer is driven by the sequential accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The timing of these events is not well understood. Moreover, it is currently unknown why the same driver gene change appears as an early event in some cancer types and as a later event, or not at all, in others. These questions have become even more topical with the recent progress brought by genome-wide sequencing studies of cancer. Focusing on mutational events, we provide a mathematical model of the full process of tumor evolution that includes different types of fitness advantages for driver genes and carrying-capacity considerations. The model is able to recapitulate a substantial proportion of the observed cancer incidence in several cancer types (colorectal, pancreatic, and leukemia) and inherited conditions (Lynch and familial adenomatous polyposis), by changing only 2 tissue-specific parameters: the number of stem cells in a tissue and its cell division frequency. The model sheds light on the evolutionary dynamics of cancer by suggesting a generalized early onset of tumorigenesis followed by slow mutational waves, in contrast to previous conclusions. Formulas and estimates are provided for the fitness increases induced by driver mutations, often much larger than previously described, and highly tissue dependent. Our results suggest a mechanistic explanation for why the selective fitness advantage introduced by specific driver genes is tissue dependent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6969520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69695202020-01-27 Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model Lahouel, Kamel Younes, Laurent Danilova, Ludmila Giardiello, Francis M. Hruban, Ralph H. Groopman, John Kinzler, Kenneth W. Vogelstein, Bert Geman, Donald Tomasetti, Cristian Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences Cancer is driven by the sequential accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The timing of these events is not well understood. Moreover, it is currently unknown why the same driver gene change appears as an early event in some cancer types and as a later event, or not at all, in others. These questions have become even more topical with the recent progress brought by genome-wide sequencing studies of cancer. Focusing on mutational events, we provide a mathematical model of the full process of tumor evolution that includes different types of fitness advantages for driver genes and carrying-capacity considerations. The model is able to recapitulate a substantial proportion of the observed cancer incidence in several cancer types (colorectal, pancreatic, and leukemia) and inherited conditions (Lynch and familial adenomatous polyposis), by changing only 2 tissue-specific parameters: the number of stem cells in a tissue and its cell division frequency. The model sheds light on the evolutionary dynamics of cancer by suggesting a generalized early onset of tumorigenesis followed by slow mutational waves, in contrast to previous conclusions. Formulas and estimates are provided for the fitness increases induced by driver mutations, often much larger than previously described, and highly tissue dependent. Our results suggest a mechanistic explanation for why the selective fitness advantage introduced by specific driver genes is tissue dependent. National Academy of Sciences 2020-01-14 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6969520/ /pubmed/31882448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914589117 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Physical Sciences Lahouel, Kamel Younes, Laurent Danilova, Ludmila Giardiello, Francis M. Hruban, Ralph H. Groopman, John Kinzler, Kenneth W. Vogelstein, Bert Geman, Donald Tomasetti, Cristian Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
title | Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
title_full | Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
title_fullStr | Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
title_short | Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
title_sort | revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model |
topic | Physical Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914589117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lahouelkamel revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT youneslaurent revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT danilovaludmila revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT giardiellofrancism revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT hrubanralphh revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT groopmanjohn revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT kinzlerkennethw revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT vogelsteinbert revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT gemandonald revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel AT tomasetticristian revisitingthetumorigenesistimelinewithadatadrivengenerativemodel |