Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions

PURPOSE: Dental implant is an effective and standardized treatment procedure in the healthcare setting. This study presents a comparison of dental implant reconstruction using screw and cement. It explicitly reviews the studies concerning cement and screws dental implants to determine the efficiency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat, Abdullah Mously, Hisham, Khalid Alamoudi, Saeed, Hossam Hashem, Abou Bakr, Hussein Naguib, Ghada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021476
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S231070
_version_ 1783489363803373568
author Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat
Abdullah Mously, Hisham
Khalid Alamoudi, Saeed
Hossam Hashem, Abou Bakr
Hussein Naguib, Ghada
author_facet Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat
Abdullah Mously, Hisham
Khalid Alamoudi, Saeed
Hossam Hashem, Abou Bakr
Hussein Naguib, Ghada
author_sort Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dental implant is an effective and standardized treatment procedure in the healthcare setting. This study presents a comparison of dental implant reconstruction using screw and cement. It explicitly reviews the studies concerning cement and screws dental implants to determine the efficiency of the two. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by comprehensively searching electronic literature. The keywords, such as “Screw versus Cement Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions,” “Screw Retained Fixed Implant.” “Cement Implant” and “Dental Implant” were used for article searching. Twelve studies were included based on the determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the screw-retained and cemented retained implant supported reconstructions. Dental implants are associated with complications leading to implant failure based on the type of restoration that is being used; cement-retained restoration and screw-retained restoration. The treatment selection must be based on the significance criteria and the tooth condition. CONCLUSION: Screw-retained implant-supported reconstructions were found to pose less biological and technological complications. Retention of the tooth is more stable and functional when implantation is selected based on the efficiency of a treatment procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6969698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69696982020-02-04 A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat Abdullah Mously, Hisham Khalid Alamoudi, Saeed Hossam Hashem, Abou Bakr Hussein Naguib, Ghada Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Review PURPOSE: Dental implant is an effective and standardized treatment procedure in the healthcare setting. This study presents a comparison of dental implant reconstruction using screw and cement. It explicitly reviews the studies concerning cement and screws dental implants to determine the efficiency of the two. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by comprehensively searching electronic literature. The keywords, such as “Screw versus Cement Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions,” “Screw Retained Fixed Implant.” “Cement Implant” and “Dental Implant” were used for article searching. Twelve studies were included based on the determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the screw-retained and cemented retained implant supported reconstructions. Dental implants are associated with complications leading to implant failure based on the type of restoration that is being used; cement-retained restoration and screw-retained restoration. The treatment selection must be based on the significance criteria and the tooth condition. CONCLUSION: Screw-retained implant-supported reconstructions were found to pose less biological and technological complications. Retention of the tooth is more stable and functional when implantation is selected based on the efficiency of a treatment procedure. Dove 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6969698/ /pubmed/32021476 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S231070 Text en © 2020 Hamed et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Hamed, Mohamed Tharwat
Abdullah Mously, Hisham
Khalid Alamoudi, Saeed
Hossam Hashem, Abou Bakr
Hussein Naguib, Ghada
A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
title A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
title_full A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
title_short A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions
title_sort systematic review of screw versus cement-retained fixed implant supported reconstructions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021476
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S231070
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedmohamedtharwat asystematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT abdullahmouslyhisham asystematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT khalidalamoudisaeed asystematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT hossamhashemaboubakr asystematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT husseinnaguibghada asystematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT hamedmohamedtharwat systematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT abdullahmouslyhisham systematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT khalidalamoudisaeed systematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT hossamhashemaboubakr systematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions
AT husseinnaguibghada systematicreviewofscrewversuscementretainedfixedimplantsupportedreconstructions