Cargando…

Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Gaël Stéphane, Teyssier, Yann, Abousalihac, Mélodie, Seigneurin, Arnaud, Ghelfi, Julien, Sengel, Christian, Decaens, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i3.324
_version_ 1783489401513312256
author Roth, Gaël Stéphane
Teyssier, Yann
Abousalihac, Mélodie
Seigneurin, Arnaud
Ghelfi, Julien
Sengel, Christian
Decaens, Thomas
author_facet Roth, Gaël Stéphane
Teyssier, Yann
Abousalihac, Mélodie
Seigneurin, Arnaud
Ghelfi, Julien
Sengel, Christian
Decaens, Thomas
author_sort Roth, Gaël Stéphane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence. AIM: To compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE (Ida-TACE) against doxorubicin-based TACE (Dox-TACE) in intermediate stage HCC. METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2014, all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened. Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B, a performance status below or equal to 1, and no prior TACE. Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin. Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients. The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria. RESULTS: Sixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin. There were 93% and 87% of cirrhotic patients and 87% and 70% of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31% and 26% of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7% and 73.3% (P = 0.797) with 41.7% and 40.0% complete response in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Progression-free survival was 7.7 mo in both groups, and liver transplant-free survival was 24.9 mo and 21.9 mo in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Safety profiles were similar in both groups, with grade 3-4 adverse events in 35% of Dox-TACE and 43% of Ida-TACEs. CONCLUSION: Ida-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6969879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69698792020-01-28 Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma Roth, Gaël Stéphane Teyssier, Yann Abousalihac, Mélodie Seigneurin, Arnaud Ghelfi, Julien Sengel, Christian Decaens, Thomas World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence. AIM: To compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE (Ida-TACE) against doxorubicin-based TACE (Dox-TACE) in intermediate stage HCC. METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2014, all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened. Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B, a performance status below or equal to 1, and no prior TACE. Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin. Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients. The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria. RESULTS: Sixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin. There were 93% and 87% of cirrhotic patients and 87% and 70% of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31% and 26% of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7% and 73.3% (P = 0.797) with 41.7% and 40.0% complete response in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Progression-free survival was 7.7 mo in both groups, and liver transplant-free survival was 24.9 mo and 21.9 mo in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Safety profiles were similar in both groups, with grade 3-4 adverse events in 35% of Dox-TACE and 43% of Ida-TACEs. CONCLUSION: Ida-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-01-21 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6969879/ /pubmed/31988592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i3.324 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Roth, Gaël Stéphane
Teyssier, Yann
Abousalihac, Mélodie
Seigneurin, Arnaud
Ghelfi, Julien
Sengel, Christian
Decaens, Thomas
Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
title Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i3.324
work_keys_str_mv AT rothgaelstephane idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT teyssieryann idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT abousalihacmelodie idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT seigneurinarnaud idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ghelfijulien idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sengelchristian idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT decaensthomas idarubicinvsdoxorubicinintransarterialchemoembolizationofintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinoma