Cargando…

Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study

Objective: Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) using cardiotocograph (CTG) is commonly used both to assess fetal wellbeing in late antepartum and for intervention during intrapartum period. We validated the performance of indigenously developed mobile cardiotocograph (CTG) device with wireless probes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Manoja Kumar, Tripathi, Reva, Kashyap, Neeraj Kumar, Fotedar, Sunita, Bisht, Surender Singh, Rathore, Asmita M., Raghav, Aakanksha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988647
_version_ 1783489403477295104
author Das, Manoja Kumar
Tripathi, Reva
Kashyap, Neeraj Kumar
Fotedar, Sunita
Bisht, Surender Singh
Rathore, Asmita M.
Raghav, Aakanksha
author_facet Das, Manoja Kumar
Tripathi, Reva
Kashyap, Neeraj Kumar
Fotedar, Sunita
Bisht, Surender Singh
Rathore, Asmita M.
Raghav, Aakanksha
author_sort Das, Manoja Kumar
collection PubMed
description Objective: Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) using cardiotocograph (CTG) is commonly used both to assess fetal wellbeing in late antepartum and for intervention during intrapartum period. We validated the performance of indigenously developed mobile cardiotocograph (CTG) device with wireless probes compared to standard CTG device. Materials and methods: We sequentially used mobile and standard CTG devices in 495 pregnant women in labour and 359 pregnant women with gestation > 32 weeks. The CTG interpreted by two independent obstetricians in a blinded manner were compared to estimate the agreement by kappa (k) statistic. Results: High level of agreements between mobile and standard CTG devices for both intrapartum (87.9%; kappa 0.61) and antepartum monitoring (91.2%; kappa 0.60) were observed. Most of the pregnant women (80% in intrapartum and 70% in antepartum groups) and all nurses and obstetricians preferred the mobile CTG device over standard CTG device. Conclusion: The mobile CTG device can reliably be used for both intrapartum and antepartum monitoring instead of the standard CTG devices. The smaller size, portability and ability to transmit the recordings for second opinion make it suitable for use by midwives for appropriate triaging and referral. Wider availability of CTG and interpretation support at the peripheral facilities would assist identifying at-risk pregnancies and foetuses for timely referral and appropriate action to reduce perinatal deaths, stillbirths and birth asphyxi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6969888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69698882020-01-27 Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study Das, Manoja Kumar Tripathi, Reva Kashyap, Neeraj Kumar Fotedar, Sunita Bisht, Surender Singh Rathore, Asmita M. Raghav, Aakanksha J Family Reprod Health Original Article Objective: Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) using cardiotocograph (CTG) is commonly used both to assess fetal wellbeing in late antepartum and for intervention during intrapartum period. We validated the performance of indigenously developed mobile cardiotocograph (CTG) device with wireless probes compared to standard CTG device. Materials and methods: We sequentially used mobile and standard CTG devices in 495 pregnant women in labour and 359 pregnant women with gestation > 32 weeks. The CTG interpreted by two independent obstetricians in a blinded manner were compared to estimate the agreement by kappa (k) statistic. Results: High level of agreements between mobile and standard CTG devices for both intrapartum (87.9%; kappa 0.61) and antepartum monitoring (91.2%; kappa 0.60) were observed. Most of the pregnant women (80% in intrapartum and 70% in antepartum groups) and all nurses and obstetricians preferred the mobile CTG device over standard CTG device. Conclusion: The mobile CTG device can reliably be used for both intrapartum and antepartum monitoring instead of the standard CTG devices. The smaller size, portability and ability to transmit the recordings for second opinion make it suitable for use by midwives for appropriate triaging and referral. Wider availability of CTG and interpretation support at the peripheral facilities would assist identifying at-risk pregnancies and foetuses for timely referral and appropriate action to reduce perinatal deaths, stillbirths and birth asphyxi. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6969888/ /pubmed/31988647 Text en Copyright © Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Das, Manoja Kumar
Tripathi, Reva
Kashyap, Neeraj Kumar
Fotedar, Sunita
Bisht, Surender Singh
Rathore, Asmita M.
Raghav, Aakanksha
Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study
title Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study
title_full Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study
title_short Clinical Validation of Mobile Cardiotocograph Device for Intrapartum and Antepartum Monitoring Compared to Standard Cardiotocograph: An Inter-Rater Agreement Study
title_sort clinical validation of mobile cardiotocograph device for intrapartum and antepartum monitoring compared to standard cardiotocograph: an inter-rater agreement study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988647
work_keys_str_mv AT dasmanojakumar clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy
AT tripathireva clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy
AT kashyapneerajkumar clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy
AT fotedarsunita clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy
AT bishtsurendersingh clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy
AT rathoreasmitam clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy
AT raghavaakanksha clinicalvalidationofmobilecardiotocographdeviceforintrapartumandantepartummonitoringcomparedtostandardcardiotocographaninterrateragreementstudy