Cargando…

Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces

Two major uses of linear perspective are in planar paintings—the flat canvas is incongruent with the painted 3-D scene—and in forced perspectives, such as theater stages that are concave truncated pyramids, where the physical geometry and the depicted scene are congruent. Patrick Hughes pioneered a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papathomas, Thomas V., Hughes, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3040063
_version_ 1783489407544721408
author Papathomas, Thomas V.
Hughes, Patrick
author_facet Papathomas, Thomas V.
Hughes, Patrick
author_sort Papathomas, Thomas V.
collection PubMed
description Two major uses of linear perspective are in planar paintings—the flat canvas is incongruent with the painted 3-D scene—and in forced perspectives, such as theater stages that are concave truncated pyramids, where the physical geometry and the depicted scene are congruent. Patrick Hughes pioneered a third major art form, the reverse perspective, where the depicted scene opposes the physical geometry. Reverse perspectives comprise solid forms composed of multiple planar surfaces (truncated pyramids and prisms) jutting toward the viewer, thus forming concave spaces between the solids. The solids are painted in reverse perspective: as an example, the left and right trapezoids of a truncated pyramid are painted as rows of houses; the bottom trapezoid is painted as the road between them and the top forms the sky. This elicits the percept of a street receding away, even though it physically juts toward the viewer. Under this illusion, the concave void spaces between the solids are transformed into convex volumes. This depth inversion creates a concomitant motion illusion: when a viewer moves in front of the art piece, the scene appears to move vividly. Two additional contributions by the artist are discussed, in which he combines reverse-perspective parts with forced and planar-perspective parts on the same art piece. The effect is spectacular, creating objects on the same planar surface that move in different directions, thus “breaking” the surface apart, demonstrating the superiority of objects over surfaces. We conclude with a discussion on the value of these art pieces in vision science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6969905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69699052020-02-04 Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces Papathomas, Thomas V. Hughes, Patrick Vision (Basel) Article Two major uses of linear perspective are in planar paintings—the flat canvas is incongruent with the painted 3-D scene—and in forced perspectives, such as theater stages that are concave truncated pyramids, where the physical geometry and the depicted scene are congruent. Patrick Hughes pioneered a third major art form, the reverse perspective, where the depicted scene opposes the physical geometry. Reverse perspectives comprise solid forms composed of multiple planar surfaces (truncated pyramids and prisms) jutting toward the viewer, thus forming concave spaces between the solids. The solids are painted in reverse perspective: as an example, the left and right trapezoids of a truncated pyramid are painted as rows of houses; the bottom trapezoid is painted as the road between them and the top forms the sky. This elicits the percept of a street receding away, even though it physically juts toward the viewer. Under this illusion, the concave void spaces between the solids are transformed into convex volumes. This depth inversion creates a concomitant motion illusion: when a viewer moves in front of the art piece, the scene appears to move vividly. Two additional contributions by the artist are discussed, in which he combines reverse-perspective parts with forced and planar-perspective parts on the same art piece. The effect is spectacular, creating objects on the same planar surface that move in different directions, thus “breaking” the surface apart, demonstrating the superiority of objects over surfaces. We conclude with a discussion on the value of these art pieces in vision science. MDPI 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6969905/ /pubmed/31735864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3040063 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papathomas, Thomas V.
Hughes, Patrick
Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces
title Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces
title_full Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces
title_fullStr Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces
title_short Hughes’s Reverspectives: Radical Uses of Linear Perspective on Non-Coplanar Surfaces
title_sort hughes’s reverspectives: radical uses of linear perspective on non-coplanar surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3040063
work_keys_str_mv AT papathomasthomasv hughessreverspectivesradicalusesoflinearperspectiveonnoncoplanarsurfaces
AT hughespatrick hughessreverspectivesradicalusesoflinearperspectiveonnoncoplanarsurfaces