Cargando…
Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis
BACKGROUND: The distraction osteogenesis (DO) is the biological process of new bone formation between the surfaces of bone segments gradually separated by incremental traction. However, the lack of solid experimental studies using the tooth-borne distractor does not allow comparing this technique wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976044 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56491 |
_version_ | 1783489419618025472 |
---|---|
author | Vale, Francisco Francisco, Inês Cavaleiro, João Caramelo, Francisco Guimarães, Adriana Brochado, João |
author_facet | Vale, Francisco Francisco, Inês Cavaleiro, João Caramelo, Francisco Guimarães, Adriana Brochado, João |
author_sort | Vale, Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The distraction osteogenesis (DO) is the biological process of new bone formation between the surfaces of bone segments gradually separated by incremental traction. However, the lack of solid experimental studies using the tooth-borne distractor does not allow comparing this technique with the classical procedures. This study aimed to establish the effect of two different activation protocols in new bone formation, with a new intraoral tooth-borne device for dog mandibular distraction osteogenesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine beagle dogs were split into 3 similar groups, Group A the control, Group B subjected to two daily activations of 0.5 mm and Group C subjected to a single daily activation of 1 mm. The distraction period was 10 days followed by a 12 weeks consolidation period. Samples where then processed and embedded in methylmethacrylate and ground to a thickness of 20µm. Toluidine blue stains were done on all specimens and histological and histomorphometric evaluation of bone tissue formed within distraction gap was performed. The statistical analysis in this manuscript was performed with IBM®-SPSS® v.20 statistics software and R software version 3.1.0. The level of significance adopted was 5 % (α=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was detected by histomorphometric evaluation between the two experimental groups in what concerns the bone volume. However, significant differences were found in the coefficients of variation between the medial and buccal areas, and the buccal and lingual areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the mandible can be lengthened successfully using a tooth-borne distractor. Moreover, it suggested that a decrease from once to twice-daily activations might negatively change the quality and structure of newly formed bone and prompt it to instability. Key words:Retrognathia, bone regeneration, osteogenesis, distraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6969957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69699572020-01-23 Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis Vale, Francisco Francisco, Inês Cavaleiro, João Caramelo, Francisco Guimarães, Adriana Brochado, João J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The distraction osteogenesis (DO) is the biological process of new bone formation between the surfaces of bone segments gradually separated by incremental traction. However, the lack of solid experimental studies using the tooth-borne distractor does not allow comparing this technique with the classical procedures. This study aimed to establish the effect of two different activation protocols in new bone formation, with a new intraoral tooth-borne device for dog mandibular distraction osteogenesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine beagle dogs were split into 3 similar groups, Group A the control, Group B subjected to two daily activations of 0.5 mm and Group C subjected to a single daily activation of 1 mm. The distraction period was 10 days followed by a 12 weeks consolidation period. Samples where then processed and embedded in methylmethacrylate and ground to a thickness of 20µm. Toluidine blue stains were done on all specimens and histological and histomorphometric evaluation of bone tissue formed within distraction gap was performed. The statistical analysis in this manuscript was performed with IBM®-SPSS® v.20 statistics software and R software version 3.1.0. The level of significance adopted was 5 % (α=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was detected by histomorphometric evaluation between the two experimental groups in what concerns the bone volume. However, significant differences were found in the coefficients of variation between the medial and buccal areas, and the buccal and lingual areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the mandible can be lengthened successfully using a tooth-borne distractor. Moreover, it suggested that a decrease from once to twice-daily activations might negatively change the quality and structure of newly formed bone and prompt it to instability. Key words:Retrognathia, bone regeneration, osteogenesis, distraction. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6969957/ /pubmed/31976044 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56491 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Vale, Francisco Francisco, Inês Cavaleiro, João Caramelo, Francisco Guimarães, Adriana Brochado, João Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis |
title | Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis |
title_full | Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis |
title_fullStr | Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis |
title_short | Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis |
title_sort | distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: histological and histomorphometric analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976044 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valefrancisco distractionosteogenesisindogwithatoothbornedevicehistologicalandhistomorphometricanalysis AT franciscoines distractionosteogenesisindogwithatoothbornedevicehistologicalandhistomorphometricanalysis AT cavaleirojoao distractionosteogenesisindogwithatoothbornedevicehistologicalandhistomorphometricanalysis AT caramelofrancisco distractionosteogenesisindogwithatoothbornedevicehistologicalandhistomorphometricanalysis AT guimaraesadriana distractionosteogenesisindogwithatoothbornedevicehistologicalandhistomorphometricanalysis AT brochadojoao distractionosteogenesisindogwithatoothbornedevicehistologicalandhistomorphometricanalysis |