Cargando…

Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate residual rotation of patients with forearm amputation and the contribution of involved muscle to residual rotation. METHODS: Testing was performed using five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens prepared by isolating muscles involved in forearm ro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Geon, Kim, Sung-Jae, Ha, Joo Hyung, Lee, Chang-Hun, Choi, Young Jin, Lee, Kwang-Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31954406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3050-x
_version_ 1783489424504389632
author Lee, Geon
Kim, Sung-Jae
Ha, Joo Hyung
Lee, Chang-Hun
Choi, Young Jin
Lee, Kwang-Hyun
author_facet Lee, Geon
Kim, Sung-Jae
Ha, Joo Hyung
Lee, Chang-Hun
Choi, Young Jin
Lee, Kwang-Hyun
author_sort Lee, Geon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate residual rotation of patients with forearm amputation and the contribution of involved muscle to residual rotation. METHODS: Testing was performed using five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens prepared by isolating muscles involved in forearm rotation. Amputation was implemented at 25 cm (wrist disarticulation), 18 cm, or 10 cm from the tip of olecranon. Supination and pronation in the amputation stump were simulated with traction of involved muscle (supinator, biceps brachii, pronator teres, pronator quadratus) using an electric actuator. The degree of rotation was examined at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° in flexion of elbow. RESULTS: Average rotation of 25 cm forearm stump was 148° (SD: 23.1). The rotation was decreased to 117.5° (SD: 26.6) at 18 cm forearm stump. It was further decreased to 63° (SD 31.5) at 10 cm forearm stump. Tendency of disorganized rotation was observed in close proximity of the amputation site to the elbow. Full residual pronation was achieved with traction of each pronator teres and pronator quadratus. Although traction of supinator could implement residual supination, the contribution of biceps brachii ranged from 4 to 88% according to the degree of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Close proximity of the amputation site to the elbow decreased the residual rotation significantly compared to residual rotation of wrist disarticulation. The preservation of pronosupination was 80% at 18 cm forearm stump. Although the pronator teres and the pronator quadratus could make a full residual pronation separately, the supinator was essential to a residual supination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6969978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69699782020-01-27 Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study Lee, Geon Kim, Sung-Jae Ha, Joo Hyung Lee, Chang-Hun Choi, Young Jin Lee, Kwang-Hyun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate residual rotation of patients with forearm amputation and the contribution of involved muscle to residual rotation. METHODS: Testing was performed using five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens prepared by isolating muscles involved in forearm rotation. Amputation was implemented at 25 cm (wrist disarticulation), 18 cm, or 10 cm from the tip of olecranon. Supination and pronation in the amputation stump were simulated with traction of involved muscle (supinator, biceps brachii, pronator teres, pronator quadratus) using an electric actuator. The degree of rotation was examined at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° in flexion of elbow. RESULTS: Average rotation of 25 cm forearm stump was 148° (SD: 23.1). The rotation was decreased to 117.5° (SD: 26.6) at 18 cm forearm stump. It was further decreased to 63° (SD 31.5) at 10 cm forearm stump. Tendency of disorganized rotation was observed in close proximity of the amputation site to the elbow. Full residual pronation was achieved with traction of each pronator teres and pronator quadratus. Although traction of supinator could implement residual supination, the contribution of biceps brachii ranged from 4 to 88% according to the degree of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Close proximity of the amputation site to the elbow decreased the residual rotation significantly compared to residual rotation of wrist disarticulation. The preservation of pronosupination was 80% at 18 cm forearm stump. Although the pronator teres and the pronator quadratus could make a full residual pronation separately, the supinator was essential to a residual supination. BioMed Central 2020-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6969978/ /pubmed/31954406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3050-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Geon
Kim, Sung-Jae
Ha, Joo Hyung
Lee, Chang-Hun
Choi, Young Jin
Lee, Kwang-Hyun
Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
title Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
title_full Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
title_fullStr Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
title_full_unstemmed Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
title_short Residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
title_sort residual rotation of forearm amputation: cadaveric study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31954406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3050-x
work_keys_str_mv AT leegeon residualrotationofforearmamputationcadavericstudy
AT kimsungjae residualrotationofforearmamputationcadavericstudy
AT hajoohyung residualrotationofforearmamputationcadavericstudy
AT leechanghun residualrotationofforearmamputationcadavericstudy
AT choiyoungjin residualrotationofforearmamputationcadavericstudy
AT leekwanghyun residualrotationofforearmamputationcadavericstudy