Cargando…

Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study

PURPOSE: Our study assessed the ability (18)F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) radiomics to differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach. METHODS: Sixty‐five breast nodules from 44 patients diagnosed as breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ou, Xuejin, Zhang, Jing, Wang, Jian, Pang, Fuwen, Wang, Yongsheng, Wei, Xiawei, Ma, Xuelei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2711
_version_ 1783489437641998336
author Ou, Xuejin
Zhang, Jing
Wang, Jian
Pang, Fuwen
Wang, Yongsheng
Wei, Xiawei
Ma, Xuelei
author_facet Ou, Xuejin
Zhang, Jing
Wang, Jian
Pang, Fuwen
Wang, Yongsheng
Wei, Xiawei
Ma, Xuelei
author_sort Ou, Xuejin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Our study assessed the ability (18)F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) radiomics to differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach. METHODS: Sixty‐five breast nodules from 44 patients diagnosed as breast carcinoma or breast lymphoma were included. Standardized uptake value (SUV) and radiomic features from CT and PET images were extracted using local image features extraction software. Six discriminative models including PETa (based on clinical, SUV and radiomic features from PET images), PETb (SUV and radiomic features from PET images), PETc (radiomic features only from PET images), CTa (clinical and radiomic features from CT images), CTb (radiomic features only from CT images), and SUV model were generated using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and linear discriminant analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the discriminative ability of these models. RESULTS: PETa and CTa models showed the best ability to differentiation in training and validation group (AUCs of 0.867 and 0.806 for PETa model, AUCs of 0.891 and 0.759 for CTa model, respectively). CONCLUSION: Models based on clinical, SUV, and radiomic features of (18)F‐FDG PET/CT images could accurately discriminate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69700462020-01-27 Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study Ou, Xuejin Zhang, Jing Wang, Jian Pang, Fuwen Wang, Yongsheng Wei, Xiawei Ma, Xuelei Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research PURPOSE: Our study assessed the ability (18)F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) radiomics to differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach. METHODS: Sixty‐five breast nodules from 44 patients diagnosed as breast carcinoma or breast lymphoma were included. Standardized uptake value (SUV) and radiomic features from CT and PET images were extracted using local image features extraction software. Six discriminative models including PETa (based on clinical, SUV and radiomic features from PET images), PETb (SUV and radiomic features from PET images), PETc (radiomic features only from PET images), CTa (clinical and radiomic features from CT images), CTb (radiomic features only from CT images), and SUV model were generated using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and linear discriminant analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the discriminative ability of these models. RESULTS: PETa and CTa models showed the best ability to differentiation in training and validation group (AUCs of 0.867 and 0.806 for PETa model, AUCs of 0.891 and 0.759 for CTa model, respectively). CONCLUSION: Models based on clinical, SUV, and radiomic features of (18)F‐FDG PET/CT images could accurately discriminate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6970046/ /pubmed/31769230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2711 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Ou, Xuejin
Zhang, Jing
Wang, Jian
Pang, Fuwen
Wang, Yongsheng
Wei, Xiawei
Ma, Xuelei
Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study
title Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study
title_full Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study
title_fullStr Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study
title_short Radiomics based on (18)F‐FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: A preliminary study
title_sort radiomics based on (18)f‐fdg pet/ct could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine‐learning approach: a preliminary study
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2711
work_keys_str_mv AT ouxuejin radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy
AT zhangjing radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy
AT wangjian radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy
AT pangfuwen radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy
AT wangyongsheng radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy
AT weixiawei radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy
AT maxuelei radiomicsbasedon18ffdgpetctcoulddifferentiatebreastcarcinomafrombreastlymphomausingmachinelearningapproachapreliminarystudy