Cargando…

Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as second‐line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) progressing after platinum‐based chemotherapy. However, some patients' disease progressed rapidly and sometimes exhibited explosive tumor progression. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergnenegre, Alain, Geier, Margaux, Guisier, Florian, Lamy, Regine, Comet, Bénédicte, Le Garff, Gwenaelle, Do, Pascal, Janicot, Henri, Morel, Hugues, Decroisette, Chantal, Andre, Michel, Falchero, Lionel, Paleiron, Nicolas, Monnet, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2716
_version_ 1783489441392754688
author Vergnenegre, Alain
Geier, Margaux
Guisier, Florian
Lamy, Regine
Comet, Bénédicte
Le Garff, Gwenaelle
Do, Pascal
Janicot, Henri
Morel, Hugues
Decroisette, Chantal
Andre, Michel
Falchero, Lionel
Paleiron, Nicolas
Monnet, Isabelle
author_facet Vergnenegre, Alain
Geier, Margaux
Guisier, Florian
Lamy, Regine
Comet, Bénédicte
Le Garff, Gwenaelle
Do, Pascal
Janicot, Henri
Morel, Hugues
Decroisette, Chantal
Andre, Michel
Falchero, Lionel
Paleiron, Nicolas
Monnet, Isabelle
author_sort Vergnenegre, Alain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as second‐line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) progressing after platinum‐based chemotherapy. However, some patients' disease progressed rapidly and sometimes exhibited explosive tumor progression. This descriptive, prospective study aimed to assess the characteristics of nonresponders with rapid progression (RP), defined as progression‐free survival (PFS) ≤2 or 2‐4 months under ICIs. METHODS: This analysis included all consecutive ICI‐treated (second‐or‐more line) patients with RP ≤4 months from 1 September 2016 to 31 August 2017 and compared the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes (overall survival [OS]; responses; PFS, according to treatment line) of NSCLCs that progressed after ≤2 vs 2‐4 months on ICIs. RESULTS: Comparisons of the 224 (70.2%) patients with ≤2‐month and 95 (29.8%) with 2‐ to 4‐month RP revealed the former had less frequent nonsmokers and ECOG PS = 0, more frequent stage IV disease and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Their respective ICI PFS rates were: 1.6 [95% CI: 0.1‐2] and 2.7 [2.0‐4.2] months, with 16.5% and 11.6% having partial responses to first‐ and second‐line therapies post‐ICI chemotherapy. Their respective median OS rates were 6.0 and 9.0 months (P ≤ .009). Multivariate analysis retained only PFS of the first‐line therapy pre‐ICI and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio at ICI onset as being significantly associated with ≤2‐month RP. CONCLUSION: In the real‐life setting, NSCLC RP on ICI remains a challenge. New descriptive and analytic studies are needed to identify factors predictive of RP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69700622020-01-27 Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04) Vergnenegre, Alain Geier, Margaux Guisier, Florian Lamy, Regine Comet, Bénédicte Le Garff, Gwenaelle Do, Pascal Janicot, Henri Morel, Hugues Decroisette, Chantal Andre, Michel Falchero, Lionel Paleiron, Nicolas Monnet, Isabelle Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as second‐line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) progressing after platinum‐based chemotherapy. However, some patients' disease progressed rapidly and sometimes exhibited explosive tumor progression. This descriptive, prospective study aimed to assess the characteristics of nonresponders with rapid progression (RP), defined as progression‐free survival (PFS) ≤2 or 2‐4 months under ICIs. METHODS: This analysis included all consecutive ICI‐treated (second‐or‐more line) patients with RP ≤4 months from 1 September 2016 to 31 August 2017 and compared the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes (overall survival [OS]; responses; PFS, according to treatment line) of NSCLCs that progressed after ≤2 vs 2‐4 months on ICIs. RESULTS: Comparisons of the 224 (70.2%) patients with ≤2‐month and 95 (29.8%) with 2‐ to 4‐month RP revealed the former had less frequent nonsmokers and ECOG PS = 0, more frequent stage IV disease and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Their respective ICI PFS rates were: 1.6 [95% CI: 0.1‐2] and 2.7 [2.0‐4.2] months, with 16.5% and 11.6% having partial responses to first‐ and second‐line therapies post‐ICI chemotherapy. Their respective median OS rates were 6.0 and 9.0 months (P ≤ .009). Multivariate analysis retained only PFS of the first‐line therapy pre‐ICI and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio at ICI onset as being significantly associated with ≤2‐month RP. CONCLUSION: In the real‐life setting, NSCLC RP on ICI remains a challenge. New descriptive and analytic studies are needed to identify factors predictive of RP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6970062/ /pubmed/31747137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2716 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Vergnenegre, Alain
Geier, Margaux
Guisier, Florian
Lamy, Regine
Comet, Bénédicte
Le Garff, Gwenaelle
Do, Pascal
Janicot, Henri
Morel, Hugues
Decroisette, Chantal
Andre, Michel
Falchero, Lionel
Paleiron, Nicolas
Monnet, Isabelle
Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)
title Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)
title_full Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)
title_fullStr Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)
title_full_unstemmed Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)
title_short Management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016‐04)
title_sort management and outcomes of non–small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second‐or‐more‐line immune checkpoint inhibitors: eroreci study (gfpc 2016‐04)
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2716
work_keys_str_mv AT vergnenegrealain managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT geiermargaux managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT guisierflorian managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT lamyregine managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT cometbenedicte managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT legarffgwenaelle managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT dopascal managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT janicothenri managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT morelhugues managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT decroisettechantal managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT andremichel managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT falcherolionel managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT paleironnicolas managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT monnetisabelle managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604
AT managementandoutcomesofnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithrapidprogressionundersecondormorelineimmunecheckpointinhibitorserorecistudygfpc201604