Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study

The performance of software tools for de novo transcriptome assembly greatly depends on the selection of software parameters. Up to now, the development of de novo transcriptome assembly for prokaryotes has not been as remarkable as that for eukaryotes. In this contribution, Rockhopper2 was used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caicedo-Montoya, Carlos, Pinilla, Laura, Toro, León F., Yepes-García, Jeferyd, Ríos-Estepa, Rigoberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ht8040020
_version_ 1783489475352985600
author Caicedo-Montoya, Carlos
Pinilla, Laura
Toro, León F.
Yepes-García, Jeferyd
Ríos-Estepa, Rigoberto
author_facet Caicedo-Montoya, Carlos
Pinilla, Laura
Toro, León F.
Yepes-García, Jeferyd
Ríos-Estepa, Rigoberto
author_sort Caicedo-Montoya, Carlos
collection PubMed
description The performance of software tools for de novo transcriptome assembly greatly depends on the selection of software parameters. Up to now, the development of de novo transcriptome assembly for prokaryotes has not been as remarkable as that for eukaryotes. In this contribution, Rockhopper2 was used to perform a comparative transcriptome analysis of Streptomyces clavuligerus exposed to diverse environmental conditions. The study focused on assessing the incidence of software parameters on software performance for the identification of differentially expressed genes as a final goal. For this, a statistical optimization was performed using the Transrate Assembly Score (TAS). TAS was also used for evaluating the software performance and for comparing it with related tools, e.g., Trinity. Transcriptome redundancy and completeness were also considered for this analysis. Rockhopper2 and Trinity reached a TAS value of 0.55092 and 0.58337, respectively. Trinity assembles transcriptomes with high redundancy, with 55.6% of transcripts having some duplicates. Additionally, we observed that the total number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) and their annotation greatly depends on the method used for removing redundancy and the tools used for transcript quantification. To our knowledge, this is the first work aimed at assessing de novo assembly software for prokaryotic organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69702272020-02-04 Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study Caicedo-Montoya, Carlos Pinilla, Laura Toro, León F. Yepes-García, Jeferyd Ríos-Estepa, Rigoberto High Throughput Article The performance of software tools for de novo transcriptome assembly greatly depends on the selection of software parameters. Up to now, the development of de novo transcriptome assembly for prokaryotes has not been as remarkable as that for eukaryotes. In this contribution, Rockhopper2 was used to perform a comparative transcriptome analysis of Streptomyces clavuligerus exposed to diverse environmental conditions. The study focused on assessing the incidence of software parameters on software performance for the identification of differentially expressed genes as a final goal. For this, a statistical optimization was performed using the Transrate Assembly Score (TAS). TAS was also used for evaluating the software performance and for comparing it with related tools, e.g., Trinity. Transcriptome redundancy and completeness were also considered for this analysis. Rockhopper2 and Trinity reached a TAS value of 0.55092 and 0.58337, respectively. Trinity assembles transcriptomes with high redundancy, with 55.6% of transcripts having some duplicates. Additionally, we observed that the total number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) and their annotation greatly depends on the method used for removing redundancy and the tools used for transcript quantification. To our knowledge, this is the first work aimed at assessing de novo assembly software for prokaryotic organisms. MDPI 2019-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6970227/ /pubmed/31801255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ht8040020 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Caicedo-Montoya, Carlos
Pinilla, Laura
Toro, León F.
Yepes-García, Jeferyd
Ríos-Estepa, Rigoberto
Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study
title Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study
title_full Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study
title_short Comparative Analysis of Strategies for De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Prokaryotes: Streptomyces clavuligerus as a Case Study
title_sort comparative analysis of strategies for de novo transcriptome assembly in prokaryotes: streptomyces clavuligerus as a case study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ht8040020
work_keys_str_mv AT caicedomontoyacarlos comparativeanalysisofstrategiesfordenovotranscriptomeassemblyinprokaryotesstreptomycesclavuligerusasacasestudy
AT pinillalaura comparativeanalysisofstrategiesfordenovotranscriptomeassemblyinprokaryotesstreptomycesclavuligerusasacasestudy
AT toroleonf comparativeanalysisofstrategiesfordenovotranscriptomeassemblyinprokaryotesstreptomycesclavuligerusasacasestudy
AT yepesgarciajeferyd comparativeanalysisofstrategiesfordenovotranscriptomeassemblyinprokaryotesstreptomycesclavuligerusasacasestudy
AT riosesteparigoberto comparativeanalysisofstrategiesfordenovotranscriptomeassemblyinprokaryotesstreptomycesclavuligerusasacasestudy