Cargando…

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence

BACKGROUND: Participation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be quite demanding and could represent an important burden for patients. We aimed to explore this research burden (i.e., the psychological, physical, and financial burdens) experienced by patients through their participation in a R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Naidoo, Nivantha, Nguyen, Van Thu, Ravaud, Philippe, Young, Bridget, Amiel, Philippe, Schanté, Daniel, Clarke, Mike, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1476-5

Ejemplares similares

Overcoming Barriers to Mobilizing Collective Intelligence in Research: Qualitative Study of Researchers With Experience of Collective Intelligence
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Patients’ Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Levels of Evidence Supporting United States Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treatment
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study
por: Oikonomidi, Theodora, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance
por: Biggane, Alice M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
por: du Vaure, Céline Buffel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
por: Lazarus, Clément, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evidence for Treatment-by-Biomarker interaction for FDA-approved Oncology Drugs with Required Pharmacogenomic Biomarker Testing
por: Vivot, Alexandre, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences
por: Escritt, Kate, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Understanding the role of the volunteer in specialist palliative care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies
por: Burbeck, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
por: Thomas, James, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Geographical Representativeness of Published and Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials. The Example of: Tobacco Consumption and HIV Infection
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
por: Baudard, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_i0bpvukvcau3o74i4b9po7j5c6