Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) affects 3.4% of the elderly over 60 years of age. It presents with exertional dyspnea, syncope, angina, and progression to irreversible congestive heart failure. Early intervention produces a better outcome in preventing the clinical deterioration of AS. The choice of int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattar, Yasar, Rauf, Hiba, Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish, Ullah, Waqas, Myla, Madhura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Cardiology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993269
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6431
_version_ 1783489523833896960
author Sattar, Yasar
Rauf, Hiba
Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish
Ullah, Waqas
Myla, Madhura
author_facet Sattar, Yasar
Rauf, Hiba
Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish
Ullah, Waqas
Myla, Madhura
author_sort Sattar, Yasar
collection PubMed
description Severe aortic stenosis (AS) affects 3.4% of the elderly over 60 years of age. It presents with exertional dyspnea, syncope, angina, and progression to irreversible congestive heart failure. Early intervention produces a better outcome in preventing the clinical deterioration of AS. The choice of intervention is transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The decision should be made after evaluating an individual case based on its clinical features and the user’s experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We reviewed available data to illustrate the types of ASs, the background of interventions, current guidelines for TAVR, and its comparison with SAVR in terms of adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69704382020-01-28 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management Sattar, Yasar Rauf, Hiba Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish Ullah, Waqas Myla, Madhura Cureus Cardiology Severe aortic stenosis (AS) affects 3.4% of the elderly over 60 years of age. It presents with exertional dyspnea, syncope, angina, and progression to irreversible congestive heart failure. Early intervention produces a better outcome in preventing the clinical deterioration of AS. The choice of intervention is transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The decision should be made after evaluating an individual case based on its clinical features and the user’s experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We reviewed available data to illustrate the types of ASs, the background of interventions, current guidelines for TAVR, and its comparison with SAVR in terms of adverse effects. Cureus 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6970438/ /pubmed/31993269 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6431 Text en Copyright © 2019, Sattar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Sattar, Yasar
Rauf, Hiba
Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish
Ullah, Waqas
Myla, Madhura
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
title Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
title_full Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
title_fullStr Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
title_full_unstemmed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
title_short Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
title_sort transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a review of aortic stenosis management
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993269
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6431
work_keys_str_mv AT sattaryasar transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementversussurgicalaorticvalvereplacementareviewofaorticstenosismanagement
AT raufhiba transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementversussurgicalaorticvalvereplacementareviewofaorticstenosismanagement
AT bareeqasyedabeenish transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementversussurgicalaorticvalvereplacementareviewofaorticstenosismanagement
AT ullahwaqas transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementversussurgicalaorticvalvereplacementareviewofaorticstenosismanagement
AT mylamadhura transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementversussurgicalaorticvalvereplacementareviewofaorticstenosismanagement

Ejemplares similares