Cargando…

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes

PURPOSE: To compare corneal deformation characteristics using ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera (Corvis ST) in patients with nonmyopic (NM), mild-to-moderate nonaxial myopic (MM), and high axial myopic (HM) eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, normal subjects aged >40 years with no his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tubtimthong, Aratchaporn, Chansangpetch, Sunee, Ratprasatporn, Nitee, Manassakorn, Anita, Tantisevi, Visanee, Rojanapongpun, Prin, Lin, Shan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8618615
_version_ 1783489534601723904
author Tubtimthong, Aratchaporn
Chansangpetch, Sunee
Ratprasatporn, Nitee
Manassakorn, Anita
Tantisevi, Visanee
Rojanapongpun, Prin
Lin, Shan C.
author_facet Tubtimthong, Aratchaporn
Chansangpetch, Sunee
Ratprasatporn, Nitee
Manassakorn, Anita
Tantisevi, Visanee
Rojanapongpun, Prin
Lin, Shan C.
author_sort Tubtimthong, Aratchaporn
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare corneal deformation characteristics using ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera (Corvis ST) in patients with nonmyopic (NM), mild-to-moderate nonaxial myopic (MM), and high axial myopic (HM) eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, normal subjects aged >40 years with no history of ocular laser/surgery were classified according to axial length (AL) and spherical equivalence (SE) into three groups: (1) NM (SE > −0.50 D and AL < 26 mm), (2) MM (SE −6.00 D to −0.50 D and AL < 26 mm), and (3) HM (SE ≤ −6.00 D and AL ≥ 26 mm). Seven parameters including corneal deformation amplitude (CDA), inward/outward corneal applanation length, inward/outward corneal velocity (ICV and OCV), peak distance, and radius were measured. Pearson correlation and linear mixed-effects model were done. RESULTS: A total of 180 eyes were recruited. 98 eyes were NM, 30 eyes were MM, and 52 eyes were HM. There were significant correlations of OCV to the degree of refractive error (r = 0.203, p < 0.001) and AL (r = −0.242, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, intraocular pressure, and corneal thickness, there was significantly higher CDA (β = 0.07, p < 0.001), faster OCV (β = −0.08, p < 0.001), and smaller radius (β = −0.39, p=0.01) in the HM group compared to the NM group. CONCLUSION: The higher CDA, faster OCV, and smaller radius found in the HM may suggest that these eyes have reduced ocular stiffness and may be less stable and more prone to stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69704962020-01-29 Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes Tubtimthong, Aratchaporn Chansangpetch, Sunee Ratprasatporn, Nitee Manassakorn, Anita Tantisevi, Visanee Rojanapongpun, Prin Lin, Shan C. Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To compare corneal deformation characteristics using ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera (Corvis ST) in patients with nonmyopic (NM), mild-to-moderate nonaxial myopic (MM), and high axial myopic (HM) eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, normal subjects aged >40 years with no history of ocular laser/surgery were classified according to axial length (AL) and spherical equivalence (SE) into three groups: (1) NM (SE > −0.50 D and AL < 26 mm), (2) MM (SE −6.00 D to −0.50 D and AL < 26 mm), and (3) HM (SE ≤ −6.00 D and AL ≥ 26 mm). Seven parameters including corneal deformation amplitude (CDA), inward/outward corneal applanation length, inward/outward corneal velocity (ICV and OCV), peak distance, and radius were measured. Pearson correlation and linear mixed-effects model were done. RESULTS: A total of 180 eyes were recruited. 98 eyes were NM, 30 eyes were MM, and 52 eyes were HM. There were significant correlations of OCV to the degree of refractive error (r = 0.203, p < 0.001) and AL (r = −0.242, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, intraocular pressure, and corneal thickness, there was significantly higher CDA (β = 0.07, p < 0.001), faster OCV (β = −0.08, p < 0.001), and smaller radius (β = −0.39, p=0.01) in the HM group compared to the NM group. CONCLUSION: The higher CDA, faster OCV, and smaller radius found in the HM may suggest that these eyes have reduced ocular stiffness and may be less stable and more prone to stress. Hindawi 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6970496/ /pubmed/31998799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8618615 Text en Copyright © 2020 Aratchaporn Tubtimthong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tubtimthong, Aratchaporn
Chansangpetch, Sunee
Ratprasatporn, Nitee
Manassakorn, Anita
Tantisevi, Visanee
Rojanapongpun, Prin
Lin, Shan C.
Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes
title Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes
title_full Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes
title_fullStr Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes
title_short Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties among Axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic Eyes
title_sort comparison of corneal biomechanical properties among axial myopic, nonaxial myopic, and nonmyopic eyes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8618615
work_keys_str_mv AT tubtimthongaratchaporn comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes
AT chansangpetchsunee comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes
AT ratprasatpornnitee comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes
AT manassakornanita comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes
AT tantisevivisanee comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes
AT rojanapongpunprin comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes
AT linshanc comparisonofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesamongaxialmyopicnonaxialmyopicandnonmyopiceyes