Cargando…
The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656 |
_version_ | 1783489552962289664 |
---|---|
author | Aubrey-Bassler, Kris Fernandes, Carolina Penney, Carla Cullen, Richard Meaney, Christopher Sopcak, Nicolette Campbell-Scherer, Denise Moineddin, Rahim Baxter, Julia Krueger, Paul Wilson, Margo Pike, Andrea Grunfeld, Eva Manca, Donna |
author_facet | Aubrey-Bassler, Kris Fernandes, Carolina Penney, Carla Cullen, Richard Meaney, Christopher Sopcak, Nicolette Campbell-Scherer, Denise Moineddin, Rahim Baxter, Julia Krueger, Paul Wilson, Margo Pike, Andrea Grunfeld, Eva Manca, Donna |
author_sort | Aubrey-Bassler, Kris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To evaluate outcomes from implementation of BETTER in diverse clinical settings. DESIGN & SETTING: An implementation study was undertaken to apply the CDPS intervention from the BETTER trial to diverse settings in BETTER 2. Patients aged 40–65 years were invited to enrol in the study from three clinics in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. METHOD: At baseline, eligibility for 27 CDPS actions (for example, cancer, diabetes and hypertension screening, lifestyle) was determined. Patients then met with a trained provider and prioritised goals to address their eligible CDPS actions. Providers received training in behaviour change theory and practice. Descriptive analysis of clinical outcomes and success factors were reported. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (119 female and 35 male) had a baseline visit; 106 had complete outcome assessments, and the remainder had partial outcome assessments. At baseline, patients were eligible for a mean of 12.3 CDPS actions and achieved a mean of 6.0 (49%, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 24% to 74%) at 6-month follow-up, including reduced hypertension (86% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 67% to 96%), weight control (51% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 42% to 60%), and smoking cessation (36% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 17% to 59%). Male, highly educated, and lower income individuals achieved a higher proportion of CDPS manoeuvers than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes from this implementation study were comparable with those of the prior BETTER RCT, providing support for the BETTER Program as an effective approach to CDPS in more diverse general practice settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6970587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69705872020-01-29 The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program Aubrey-Bassler, Kris Fernandes, Carolina Penney, Carla Cullen, Richard Meaney, Christopher Sopcak, Nicolette Campbell-Scherer, Denise Moineddin, Rahim Baxter, Julia Krueger, Paul Wilson, Margo Pike, Andrea Grunfeld, Eva Manca, Donna BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To evaluate outcomes from implementation of BETTER in diverse clinical settings. DESIGN & SETTING: An implementation study was undertaken to apply the CDPS intervention from the BETTER trial to diverse settings in BETTER 2. Patients aged 40–65 years were invited to enrol in the study from three clinics in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. METHOD: At baseline, eligibility for 27 CDPS actions (for example, cancer, diabetes and hypertension screening, lifestyle) was determined. Patients then met with a trained provider and prioritised goals to address their eligible CDPS actions. Providers received training in behaviour change theory and practice. Descriptive analysis of clinical outcomes and success factors were reported. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (119 female and 35 male) had a baseline visit; 106 had complete outcome assessments, and the remainder had partial outcome assessments. At baseline, patients were eligible for a mean of 12.3 CDPS actions and achieved a mean of 6.0 (49%, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 24% to 74%) at 6-month follow-up, including reduced hypertension (86% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 67% to 96%), weight control (51% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 42% to 60%), and smoking cessation (36% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 17% to 59%). Male, highly educated, and lower income individuals achieved a higher proportion of CDPS manoeuvers than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes from this implementation study were comparable with those of the prior BETTER RCT, providing support for the BETTER Program as an effective approach to CDPS in more diverse general practice settings. Royal College of General Practitioners 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6970587/ /pubmed/31581121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656 Text en Copyright © 2019, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Aubrey-Bassler, Kris Fernandes, Carolina Penney, Carla Cullen, Richard Meaney, Christopher Sopcak, Nicolette Campbell-Scherer, Denise Moineddin, Rahim Baxter, Julia Krueger, Paul Wilson, Margo Pike, Andrea Grunfeld, Eva Manca, Donna The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program |
title | The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program |
title_full | The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program |
title_short | The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program |
title_sort | effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the better 2 program |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aubreybasslerkris theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT fernandescarolina theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT penneycarla theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT cullenrichard theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT meaneychristopher theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT sopcaknicolette theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT campbellschererdenise theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT moineddinrahim theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT baxterjulia theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT kruegerpaul theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT wilsonmargo theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT pikeandrea theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT grunfeldeva theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT mancadonna theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT aubreybasslerkris effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT fernandescarolina effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT penneycarla effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT cullenrichard effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT meaneychristopher effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT sopcaknicolette effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT campbellschererdenise effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT moineddinrahim effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT baxterjulia effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT kruegerpaul effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT wilsonmargo effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT pikeandrea effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT grunfeldeva effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program AT mancadonna effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program |