Cargando…

The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program

BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aubrey-Bassler, Kris, Fernandes, Carolina, Penney, Carla, Cullen, Richard, Meaney, Christopher, Sopcak, Nicolette, Campbell-Scherer, Denise, Moineddin, Rahim, Baxter, Julia, Krueger, Paul, Wilson, Margo, Pike, Andrea, Grunfeld, Eva, Manca, Donna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656
_version_ 1783489552962289664
author Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Fernandes, Carolina
Penney, Carla
Cullen, Richard
Meaney, Christopher
Sopcak, Nicolette
Campbell-Scherer, Denise
Moineddin, Rahim
Baxter, Julia
Krueger, Paul
Wilson, Margo
Pike, Andrea
Grunfeld, Eva
Manca, Donna
author_facet Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Fernandes, Carolina
Penney, Carla
Cullen, Richard
Meaney, Christopher
Sopcak, Nicolette
Campbell-Scherer, Denise
Moineddin, Rahim
Baxter, Julia
Krueger, Paul
Wilson, Margo
Pike, Andrea
Grunfeld, Eva
Manca, Donna
author_sort Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To evaluate outcomes from implementation of BETTER in diverse clinical settings. DESIGN & SETTING: An implementation study was undertaken to apply the CDPS intervention from the BETTER trial to diverse settings in BETTER 2. Patients aged 40–65 years were invited to enrol in the study from three clinics in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. METHOD: At baseline, eligibility for 27 CDPS actions (for example, cancer, diabetes and hypertension screening, lifestyle) was determined. Patients then met with a trained provider and prioritised goals to address their eligible CDPS actions. Providers received training in behaviour change theory and practice. Descriptive analysis of clinical outcomes and success factors were reported. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (119 female and 35 male) had a baseline visit; 106 had complete outcome assessments, and the remainder had partial outcome assessments. At baseline, patients were eligible for a mean of 12.3 CDPS actions and achieved a mean of 6.0 (49%, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 24% to 74%) at 6-month follow-up, including reduced hypertension (86% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 67% to 96%), weight control (51% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 42% to 60%), and smoking cessation (36% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 17% to 59%). Male, highly educated, and lower income individuals achieved a higher proportion of CDPS manoeuvers than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes from this implementation study were comparable with those of the prior BETTER RCT, providing support for the BETTER Program as an effective approach to CDPS in more diverse general practice settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69705872020-01-29 The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program Aubrey-Bassler, Kris Fernandes, Carolina Penney, Carla Cullen, Richard Meaney, Christopher Sopcak, Nicolette Campbell-Scherer, Denise Moineddin, Rahim Baxter, Julia Krueger, Paul Wilson, Margo Pike, Andrea Grunfeld, Eva Manca, Donna BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To evaluate outcomes from implementation of BETTER in diverse clinical settings. DESIGN & SETTING: An implementation study was undertaken to apply the CDPS intervention from the BETTER trial to diverse settings in BETTER 2. Patients aged 40–65 years were invited to enrol in the study from three clinics in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. METHOD: At baseline, eligibility for 27 CDPS actions (for example, cancer, diabetes and hypertension screening, lifestyle) was determined. Patients then met with a trained provider and prioritised goals to address their eligible CDPS actions. Providers received training in behaviour change theory and practice. Descriptive analysis of clinical outcomes and success factors were reported. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (119 female and 35 male) had a baseline visit; 106 had complete outcome assessments, and the remainder had partial outcome assessments. At baseline, patients were eligible for a mean of 12.3 CDPS actions and achieved a mean of 6.0 (49%, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 24% to 74%) at 6-month follow-up, including reduced hypertension (86% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 67% to 96%), weight control (51% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 42% to 60%), and smoking cessation (36% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 17% to 59%). Male, highly educated, and lower income individuals achieved a higher proportion of CDPS manoeuvers than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes from this implementation study were comparable with those of the prior BETTER RCT, providing support for the BETTER Program as an effective approach to CDPS in more diverse general practice settings. Royal College of General Practitioners 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6970587/ /pubmed/31581121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656 Text en Copyright © 2019, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Fernandes, Carolina
Penney, Carla
Cullen, Richard
Meaney, Christopher
Sopcak, Nicolette
Campbell-Scherer, Denise
Moineddin, Rahim
Baxter, Julia
Krueger, Paul
Wilson, Margo
Pike, Andrea
Grunfeld, Eva
Manca, Donna
The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
title The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
title_full The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
title_fullStr The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
title_short The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program
title_sort effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the better 2 program
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656
work_keys_str_mv AT aubreybasslerkris theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT fernandescarolina theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT penneycarla theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT cullenrichard theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT meaneychristopher theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT sopcaknicolette theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT campbellschererdenise theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT moineddinrahim theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT baxterjulia theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT kruegerpaul theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT wilsonmargo theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT pikeandrea theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT grunfeldeva theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT mancadonna theeffectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT aubreybasslerkris effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT fernandescarolina effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT penneycarla effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT cullenrichard effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT meaneychristopher effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT sopcaknicolette effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT campbellschererdenise effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT moineddinrahim effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT baxterjulia effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT kruegerpaul effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT wilsonmargo effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT pikeandrea effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT grunfeldeva effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program
AT mancadonna effectivenessofaprovenchronicdiseasepreventionandscreeninginterventionindiverseandremoteprimarycaresettingsanimplementationstudyonthebetter2program