Cargando…

They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger

Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosa, Miriam, Giessner, Steffen, Guerra, Rita, Waldzus, Sven, Kersting, Anna-Maria, Veličković, Katarina, Collins, Elizabeth C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772
_version_ 1783489649889509376
author Rosa, Miriam
Giessner, Steffen
Guerra, Rita
Waldzus, Sven
Kersting, Anna-Maria
Veličković, Katarina
Collins, Elizabeth C.
author_facet Rosa, Miriam
Giessner, Steffen
Guerra, Rita
Waldzus, Sven
Kersting, Anna-Maria
Veličković, Katarina
Collins, Elizabeth C.
author_sort Rosa, Miriam
collection PubMed
description Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations’ perspective on mergers (N’s = 479, 150, 266, 113, and 229, respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs. systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1–5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1–3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69711012020-01-28 They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger Rosa, Miriam Giessner, Steffen Guerra, Rita Waldzus, Sven Kersting, Anna-Maria Veličković, Katarina Collins, Elizabeth C. Front Psychol Psychology Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations’ perspective on mergers (N’s = 479, 150, 266, 113, and 229, respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs. systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1–5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1–3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6971101/ /pubmed/31993001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rosa, Giessner, Guerra, Waldzus, Kersting, Veličković and Collins. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Rosa, Miriam
Giessner, Steffen
Guerra, Rita
Waldzus, Sven
Kersting, Anna-Maria
Veličković, Katarina
Collins, Elizabeth C.
They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
title They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
title_full They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
title_fullStr They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
title_full_unstemmed They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
title_short They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
title_sort they (don’t) need us: functional indispensability impacts perceptions of representativeness and commitment when lower-status groups go through an intergroup merger
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772
work_keys_str_mv AT rosamiriam theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger
AT giessnersteffen theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger
AT guerrarita theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger
AT waldzussven theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger
AT kerstingannamaria theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger
AT velickovickatarina theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger
AT collinselizabethc theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger