Cargando…
They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger
Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772 |
_version_ | 1783489649889509376 |
---|---|
author | Rosa, Miriam Giessner, Steffen Guerra, Rita Waldzus, Sven Kersting, Anna-Maria Veličković, Katarina Collins, Elizabeth C. |
author_facet | Rosa, Miriam Giessner, Steffen Guerra, Rita Waldzus, Sven Kersting, Anna-Maria Veličković, Katarina Collins, Elizabeth C. |
author_sort | Rosa, Miriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations’ perspective on mergers (N’s = 479, 150, 266, 113, and 229, respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs. systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1–5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1–3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6971101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69711012020-01-28 They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger Rosa, Miriam Giessner, Steffen Guerra, Rita Waldzus, Sven Kersting, Anna-Maria Veličković, Katarina Collins, Elizabeth C. Front Psychol Psychology Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations’ perspective on mergers (N’s = 479, 150, 266, 113, and 229, respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs. systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1–5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1–3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6971101/ /pubmed/31993001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rosa, Giessner, Guerra, Waldzus, Kersting, Veličković and Collins. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Rosa, Miriam Giessner, Steffen Guerra, Rita Waldzus, Sven Kersting, Anna-Maria Veličković, Katarina Collins, Elizabeth C. They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger |
title | They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger |
title_full | They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger |
title_fullStr | They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger |
title_full_unstemmed | They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger |
title_short | They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger |
title_sort | they (don’t) need us: functional indispensability impacts perceptions of representativeness and commitment when lower-status groups go through an intergroup merger |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosamiriam theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger AT giessnersteffen theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger AT guerrarita theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger AT waldzussven theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger AT kerstingannamaria theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger AT velickovickatarina theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger AT collinselizabethc theydontneedusfunctionalindispensabilityimpactsperceptionsofrepresentativenessandcommitmentwhenlowerstatusgroupsgothroughanintergroupmerger |